Commentaries

Obesity (2008) 16, 5–6. doi:10.1038/oby.2007.52

The Low-Fat Imperative

George L Blackburn1

1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Center for the Study of Nutrition Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence: George L. Blackburn, (gblackbu@bidmc.harvard.edu)

Received 3 October 2007; Accepted 8 October 2007.

This issue of Obesity includes two studies that support reduced fat consumption, Donnelly et al. and Donahoo et al. Diets with less fat (approx20–25%) can reduce mean energy intake by 100 kcal/day—enough to stop the growing epidemic of overweight and obesity. Our task is not to debate whether low-fat diets work, but to find ways to increase adherence to them.

Approximately two-thirds of the US adult population is overweight and one-third is obese.1 In 2002, obesity and obesity-related complications accounted for 9.1% of US health care expenditures (or more than $92 billion), and those numbers are rising.2

Cutting dietary fat is the most efficient way to stop the obesity epidemic. With 9 kcal/g, fat is the most energy-dense nutrient. Eating less fat, particularly less saturated and trans fat, easily reduces energy intake.

This issue of Obesity includes two studies that support reduced fat consumption, Donnelly et al.3 and Donahoo et al.4 Each examines the typical range of western fat intake and suggests that eating more fat leads to increased energy intake and greater weight gain compared with reduced fat consumption. Diets with less fat (approx20–25%) can reduce mean energy intake by 100 kcal/day, or the equivalent, over the course of a year, of 10 lb—enough to stop the growing epidemic of overweight and obesity.5,6,7

Low-fat diets produce moderate weight loss, but questions remain as to whether such diets can be sustained. Long-term studies demonstrate that diets moderately low in fat can be maintained over time. In a 7-year follow-up, the Women's Health Initiative found that those who consumed less fat and more fruits, vegetables, and whole grains lost more weight than controls, and maintained their weight loss.8 The Framingham Study showed that over 40 years, a modest 5–7% decrease in dietary fat reduced total caloric intake by approx150 kcal/day in men and 100 kcal/day in women.9,10

Health benefits from low-fat diets are not unimpressive. A 5-year study examining cancer patients in remission found that those who consumed the prototypical "Western Diet" (characterized by high intake of fat, red meat, refined grains, and desserts) showed a higher risk of recurrence than those who ate less of those foods.11 The recently completed Women's Intervention Nutrition Study found that a diet low in fat (33.3 g/day vs. 51.3 g/day) and higher in fiber, fruits, and vegetables produced greater weight loss over 5 years, and reduced breast cancer relapse rates by 24%.12

Unlike a diet high in carbohydrates and proteins, a high-fat diet works against the goals of healthy eating. Satiety hormones in the gut, e.g., cholecystokinin and peptide-YY, normally slow gastric emptying and promote satiety in response to nutrient stimulation. With long-term intake of a high-fat diet (i.e., 58% energy), these hormones become dysregulated.13 Hunger increases, as does energy intake required to achieve satiety. In turn, body weight also increases.

The United States Department of Agriculture has been recommending moderate fat intake since it released its first set of nutritional guidelines in 1916.14 The American Dietetic Association,15 American Heart Association,16 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,17 and the Institute of Medicine18 all recommend lifetime consumption of diets high in vegetables and moderately low in fat.

Evolution favors such a diet. For nearly 2 million years, our predecessors consumed lean meat, fish, vegetables, fruits, and nuts—low-fat diets high in fiber, proteins, and essential fatty acids. Retrospective models of Paleolithic diets estimate macronutrient content at approx62% carbohydrates, 24% fat, and 14% protein.19 Whole foods and moderately low-fat diets approximate this macronutrient content. As all macronutrient-based diets produce similar long-term weight loss, it does not matter which one people choose; the key is long-term adherence and maintenance of weight loss.

Our task is not to debate whether low-fat diets work, but to find ways to increase adherence to them. We need to spread the message that moderate weight loss of 10% is an acceptable, healthy option for those who want to lose weight—an option easily achieved by cutting small amounts of fat out of each meal. This is a reasonable and realistic goal, one that can be achieved as well as sustained.

Top

DISCLOSURE

The author is a co-primary investigator for the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (grant number CA45504) and the Boston Obesity and Nutrition Research Center (grant number P30DK46200).

Top

References

REFERENCES

  1. National Center for Health Statistics. Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Health, United States. Public Health Service: Hyattsville, MD, 2006
  2. Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who's paying? Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;(Suppl):W3-219–226.
  3. Donnelly JE, SullivanDK, Smith BK et al. Alteration of dietary fat intake to prevent weight gain: Jayhawk Observed Eating Trial. Obesity 2008;16:107–112. | Article |
  4. Donahoo W, Wyatt HR, Kriehn J et al. Dietary fat increases energy intake across the range of typical consumption in the United States. Obesity 2008;16:64–69. | Article |
  5. Friedman JM. A war on obesity, not the obese. Science 2003;299:856–858. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Veerman JL, Barendregt JJ, van Beeck EF, Seidell JC, Mackenbach JP. Stemming the obesity epidemic: a tantalizing prospect. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:2365–2370. | PubMed |
  7. Flegal KM, Troiano RP. Changes in the distribution of body mass index of adults and children in the US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:807–818. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  8. Howard BV, Manson JE, Stefanick ML et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and weight change over 7 years: the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA 2006;295:39–49. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  9. Millen BE, Quatromoni PA, Franz MM et al. Population nutrient intake approaches dietary recommendations: 1991 to 1995 Framingham Nutrition Studies. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97:742–749. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  10. Posner BM, Franz MM, Quatromoni PA et al. Secular trends in diet and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. J Am Diet Assoc 1995;95:171–179. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  11. Meyerhardt JA, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D. et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA 2007;298:754–764. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  12. Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA et al. Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1767–1776. | PubMed |
  13. Little TJ, Horowitz M, Feinle-Bisset C . Modulation by high-fat diets of gastrointestinal function and hormones associated with the regulation of energy intake: implications for the pathophysiology of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:531–541. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  14. Davis C, Saltos E. Dietary recommendations and how they have changed over time. In: Frazao E (ed). America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences (AIB-750). USDA Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, 1999, pp 33–50.
  15. American Dietetic Association. Who We Are, What We Do. American Dietetic Association, 2007.
  16. American Heart Association. Healthy Lifestyle, Diet and Nutrition. American Heart Association, 2007
  17. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Aim for a Healthy Weight. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 2005.
  18. Institute of Medicine. Dietary References Intake for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2005
  19. Cordain L, Miller JB, Eaton SB et al. Plant-animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:682–692. | PubMed | ChemPort |
Top

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this manuscript was supported in part by the Center for Healthy Living at Harvard Medical School. The author thanks Shannon G. Fischer and Rita B. Buckley for technical and editorial support.

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT