TABLE 1.
FROM:
Intra-abdominal Fat Burden Discriminated In Vivo Using Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Brent E. Walling, Jeeva Munasinghe, David Berrigan, Michael Q. Bailey and R. Mark Simpson
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1.. Mean body weight, intra-abdominal fat volume, and intra-abdominal fat area in three mouse strains differing in body composition
| Mouse strain | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | A-ZIP/F (minimal fat) | C57BL/6 (lean) | Lepob (obese) | p |
| Mice (N) | 3 | 5 | 5 | |
| Replicate measures (N)* | 8 | 15 | 13 | |
| Mass (g) | 25.1b † (0.8)‡ | 20.2a (0.6) | 55.7c (0.7) | <0.0001 |
Fat volume ( L) | 176a (202) | 723b (148) | 12,822c (159) | <0.0001 |
| Fat area (mm2)§ | 7.0a (13) | 38b (9) | 642c (10) | <0.0001 |
* Replicate evaluations were performed on each mouse group member. Number indicates total measures made from all mice in the case of each parameter: mass, volume, area.
† Letters appear in rank order by row, with lowest value indicated by a, highest value by c. Superscript letters indicate means that are significantly different, based on Tukey's honestly significant difference test on natural log-transformed values for all measurements taken from body weight or images.
‡ Values in parentheses represent 1 standard error, untransformed.
§ Intra-abdominal fat area at the level of the fourth to fifth lumbar vertebrae.

L)