Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focus
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
The EMBO Journal
Nature Reports Stem Cells
Nature Reports Avian Flu
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Letter
Nature Structural Biology  9, 425 - 430 (2002)
Published online: 29 April 2002; | doi:10.1038/nsb798

Designing a 20-residue protein

Jonathan W. Neidigh, R. Matthew Fesinmeyer & Niels H. Andersen

Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Niels H. Andersen andersen@chem.washington.edu.
Truncation and mutation of a poorly folded 39-residue peptide has produced 20-residue constructs that are >95% folded in water at physiological pH. These constructs optimize a novel fold, designated as the 'Trp-cage' motif, and are significantly more stable than any other miniprotein reported to date. Folding is cooperative and hydrophobically driven by the encapsulation of a Trp side chain in a sheath of Pro rings. As the smallest protein-like construct, Trp-cage miniproteins should provide a testing ground for both experimental studies and computational simulations of protein folding and unfolding pathways. Pro−Trp interactions may be a particularly effective strategy for the a priori design of self-folding peptides.

The a priori design of proteins and the determination of the minimum requirements for the formation of protein-like structures are currently the subject of active research, with several notable achievements reported in the past few years1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Excluding systems with disulfide or metal chelation crosslinks, the smallest natural domains that fold autonomously have 32−40 residues6, 7, 8, 9. The design of stable protein-like structures with a smaller number of residues requires both an exquisite optimization of hydrophobic packing and a strategy to decrease the backbone configurational entropy of the unfolded state.

There have been successes in the minimization of known folds and the design of stable miniproteins. Dahiyat and Mayo1 have reported a 28-residue zinc finger mimic that displays a stable fold and some degree of cooperativity in its melting behavior as monitored by CD. The smallest natural proteins are WW domains, which have an antiparallel three-stranded beta-sheet and two conserved Trp residues. The Pin WW domain can be truncated to 28 residues and retain two-state folding behavior9. The Serrano group designed Betanova10, a 20-residue beta-sheet that is approx12% folded in water at 10 °C (ref. 11). Well-folded three-stranded beta-sheets of 20−29 residues in length have been designed4, 12, but these require d-amino acids to improve turn propensities. The goal of our fold optimization program is the production of a 20-residue, self-folding peptide using only the standard set of l-amino acids. Further, we want the hydrophobic effect13, 14, rather than secondary structure stability, to drive structure formation to impart protein-like folding behavior.

Although there is no universally accepted definition for a 'self-folding domain'7, the following features are useful diagnostics: (i) multiple secondary structure elements in close contact; (ii) notable chemical shift dispersion that predominantly reflects tertiary interactions; (iii) side chain−side chain packing interactions that produce well-defined chi1 and chi2 values; (iv) greater backbone amide exchange protection than that provided by secondary structure; and (v) some degree of folding cooperativity and resistance to thermal unfolding. Here we report a 20-residue construct (Fig. 1b) that displays these characteristics and the fold-minimization strategy that provided this miniprotein.

Figure 1. Truncation and optimization of the C-terminal fold of EX4.
Figure 1 thumbnail

a, The structure of EX4 in aqueous 30% TFE. A helix ribbon is shown for residues 8−28, with the side chain atoms of Leu 21, Phe 22, Trp 25 and all atoms of residues 29−39 are displayed with standard CPK color scheme: carbon, black; hydrogen, white; nitrogen, blue; and oxygen, red. The green spheres represent hydrogens that display large upfield shifts due to ring current effects. Hydrogen bonds producing exchange protection are indicated as follows: the thick and thin black lines represent NHs with hydrogen bond fractional populations 0.9994 and 0.985−0.998, respectively. Green lines in the substantially frayed N-terminus represent hydrogen bonds with the fractional population shown. b, CPK model of the designed miniprotein TC5b . The indole ring is highlighted in magenta; the strongly upfield-shifted Gly30-Halpha2 is shown in green.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (31K)
Mutational optimization of the 'Trp cage'
The NMR structure15 of the predominantly helical, 39-residue peptide exendin-4 (EX4) from Gila monster saliva served as our starting point. EX4 appears to be poorly folded in water as it aggregates at NMR concentrations but is stable and folded (Fig. 1a) in aqueous fluoroalcohol media. The feature that was most striking about the XFXXWXXXXGPXXXXPPPX (where X is any amino acid) sequence is the close association of a Gly and three Pro residues (shown in bold) with the two aromatic side chains. We have designated this fold as the 'Trp cage'. Sequence-remote hydrogens located above and below the indole ring of Trp 25 display large chemical shift deviations (CSDs) due to ring current shielding effects. The following CSDs were observed for EX4 in 30% trifluoroethanol (TFE): -3.00 and -1.44 (Gly 30-alpha2 and -alpha3, respectively), -0.67 (Pro 31-delta3), -1.82 (Pro 37-alpha), -1.52 (Pro 37-beta3) and -0.57 p.p.m. (Pro 38-delta2/delta3). These shift deviations provide the most direct NMR assay for the extent of folding of modified sequences.

The unique structure of the Trp-cage motif in EX4 and its apparent lack of interactions with the N-terminal half of the sequence suggest that the domain could be extracted and still form a stable structure. Tests of a series of truncated/mutated sequences (Table 1) in aqueous fluoroalcohol media indicate that all of the species, with the exception of Trp-cage construct 1c (TC1c), are 97% folded. Folding in water was monitored in several ways: the absence of multiple Xaa-Pro cis/trans isomers, the presence of characteristic long-range NOEs and diagnostic chemical shift deviations. Of these, the CSDs provide the more quantitative measures of folding (Table 1). Helicity could be tracked by the Halpha CSDs for the helix (residues 21−27), with the shifts of 30-alpha3 and 31-delta3 monitoring C-capping. The sum of the upfield shifts for C-terminal Pro resonances (37-alphabeta3, and 38-delta2 and -delta3) monitors Trp-cage formation. The largest values observed for the 'C-cap' and 'cage formation' measures were equated with '100% folded'. The upfield shift of Gly 30-alpha2 reflects both C-capping and tertiary structure formation.

Table 1. NMR folding measures for truncated sequences
Table 1 thumbnail

Full TableFull Table
All of the helix that is not buried by the Pro 37-Pro 38 unit can be eliminated without disrupting the Trp cage, so long as the remaining helix is stabilized by an N-capping box (TC1 and TC2) or a single N-capping residue (Asp, Asn or Gly). TC1c was the first species prepared that is readily soluble in water but only approx23% folded based on the CSDs for Pro 37 and Pro 38. In the partially folded 20-residue constructs, the extent of tertiary structuring in water correlates with the N-cap propensities (Asp Asn > Gly)16, and all measures of tertiary structuring and helicity are highly correlated. However, the C-terminal Trp-cage fold of these 20mers is, at most, 40% populated according to the diagnostic chemical shift criteria.

An examination of the NMR structure (data not shown) derived for TC4a mutant revealed that the Arg 35 side chain was located close to the Asn 28 side chain function. An N28D mutation was incorporated (TC5a and TC5b) in hopes of creating an hydrogen bonded salt bridge. This mutation was coupled with an E24Q mutation to avoid a potentially unfavorable coulombic interaction (EXXXD) in the helix (introducing in its place a pH-dependent helix-favoring QXXXD interaction)17. The F22Y mutation was included in TC5b because Tyr side chains are more commonly observed to have hydrophobic stacking interactions with both Pro and Trp residues in proteins. TC5b is >95% folded in water, displaying the same CD spectrum with or without the addition of TFE (Fig. 2a), and melts cooperatively (Fig. 2b). The ring current shifts of TC5b are remarkable: Pro 37-beta3 (delta = 0.34 p.p.m.) and Gly 30-alpha2 (delta = 0.72 p.p.m.) are the two furthest upfield resonances in the 1H-NMR spectrum (D2O buffer at pH* 6 (uncorrected for isotope effect)). The shift of Gly 30-alpha2 seems to be the most upfield observation for a non-heme protein. NMR lineshapes and the concentration independence of all spectroscopic parameters imply a monomeric structured state. With TC5b, we appeared to have achieved our stated goal, and further studies focused on this construct.

Figure 2. Folding measures for Trp-cage construct 5b.
Figure 2 thumbnail

a, CD spectra of 66 muM TC5b in pH 7 aqueous buffer (2 °C) and buffer with 30% (v/v) TFE: residue molar ellipticity versus wavelength. The curve shape suggests an unrealistically high level of helicity from a reinforcing Trp side chain chromophore contribution near the amide n−pi* transition. b, CD-monitored melts for TC5b in pH 7 aqueous buffer with and without the addition of 30% TFE or guanidine-HCl (6.3 M): [theta]222 versus T (°C). The denatured state data was fit to a line; the curves through the other data points are polynomial fits with no theoretical significance. c, Graphs illustrating the correlation of chemical shift temperature gradients (Deltadelta/DeltaT) with the chemical shift deviations observed in D2O at 7 °C. All CalphaH resonances (|CSD| > 0.1 p.p.m.) are shown (solid squares) and are the basis for the least-squares fit; other CH signals (open circles) in the C-terminal portion of the structure fall on the same line. The Pro31-delta3 resonance (red circle) is an outlier (see text). d, Unfolded mole fraction versus T (°C) from the CD data and NMR, the latter based on 11 fractional chemical shift deviations (23-alpha, 26-alpha, 30-alpha2; 31-alpha and -beta3; 37-alpha, -beta3 and -delta3; and 38-alpha, -delta2 and -delta3). The NMR measures are shown with error bars (plusminuss.e.); greater scatter would be expected for noncooperative unfolding. The CD values were converted to fraction unfolded assuming the guanidine-HCl line in (b) represents 100% unfolded and a common temperature gradient ([theta]222 / T = +52° per °C) for the 100% folded baselines. The intercept values of [theta]222 were -16,100° (buffer) and -17,200° (30% TFE).



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (57K)
TC5b fold characteristics and stability
A structure ensemble for TC5b was generated from 169 NOE distances, of which 28 were i/i+n (n > 4) constraints. The key long-range NOEs involving the central Trp residue are illustrated in Fig. 3. Even though 10 NHs are exchange protected (vide infra), no hydrogen bond constraints are employed because there is no independent basis for assigning the electron pair donors involved. This highly conservative data treatment produced a well-converged structure (Fig. 3a; Table 2), with an alpha-helix from Leu 21 to Lys 27 and a short 310-helix (residues 30−33). The unusual features are a Gly30-NH hydrogen bond to the i-5 backbone carbonyl, an indole-NHalt epsilon1 hydrogen bond to the i+10 backbone carbonyl and the placement of Pro rings on both faces of the indole ring, with the Tyr ring completing the Trp-cage hydrophobic cluster. The degree of side chain rotamer restriction observed in the NMR ensemble argues against a fluxional structure. The TC5b structure is compact and globular (Fig. 1b).

Figure 3. NMR spectra and the structure derived for TC5b.
Figure 3 thumbnail

a, Stereo view of the NMR ensemble (38 of 50 structures for TC5b in pH 7 aqueous buffer (Table 1)). All atoms are displayed for Tyr 22 (orange), Trp 25 (magenta), Leu 26 (cyan), Pro 31 (dark red), Pro 36 (black), Pro 37 (green) and Pro 38 (blue). For the remaining residues, only the backbone is displayed. The heavy-atom pairwise r.m.s. deviation over the key residues in the Trp cage (Tyr 22, Trp 25, Gly 30, Pro 31, Pro 37 and Pro 38) is 0.46 plusminus 0.15 Å. The annotated NOESY segments b, with added TFE and c, without TFE illustrate the diagnostic long-range NOEs. This is the same color scheme used in (a), with Leu 21, Gln 24, Gly 30 and Arg 35 also shown in black. In (b), the unlabeled line at 7.36 p.p.m. is Ile 23-HN. The key long-range NOEs of TC5b (for example, 22-alpha to 38-gamma, 22-delta to 38-delta2, 22-alt epsilon to 37-beta2, 25-alt epsilon1 to 35-gamma/36-alpha/37-alpha, 25-delta1 to 35-beta/38-delta2, 25-eta2 to 31-delta3 and 25-zeta2 to 31-alpha/37-delta2-delta3) were observed in both media (the 22-alpha/38-gamma NOE does not appear in (c)). Trp 25-Hdelta1/Halt epsilon3 and Heta2/Hzeta2 are nearly and completely shift coincident, respectively, in aqueous buffer. Long-range NOEs to these indole ring resonances are attributed to individual hydrogen sites based on their occurrence in other Trp-cage constructs under conditions where the resonances are not shift coincident. d, TC5b is in a temperature dependent equilibrium with an 'unfolded state' that does not display random coil shifts because of residual local hydrophobic cluster formation. The increasingly negative CSDs of 31-delta3 and 30-alpha3 are rationalized because the 'residual' high temperature hydrophobic cluster between Trp 25 and Pro 31 places these two protons further into the shielding region than their location in the unmelted Trp cage.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (91K)
Table 2. NMR structure statistics1
Table 2 thumbnail

Full TableFull Table
For measures of fold stability, we used NH exchange protection. Helix/coil transition algorithms (for example, AGADIR)18, predict protection factors 1.5 for the nine-residue (including the capping residues) helix of TC5b. In agreement with this prediction, truncated peptides lacking the C-terminal (Pro)3-unit do not display measurable NH protection (data not shown). In contrast, NHalt epsilon1 of Trp 25 and nine backbone NHs (residues 23−28, 30, 33 and 35) of TC5b are significantly protected (protection factor (PF) = krc / kobs = 101.01 plusminus 0.23 at pH* 3.63). Upon titration to pH* 6.03, the Trp 25-Halt epsilon1 protection factor increases from 101.10 to 101.83. This is attributed to the ionization of Asp 28 and fold stabilization through formation of a salt bridge with Arg 35. The formation of tertiary structures clearly results in enhanced exchange protection. To our knowledge, TC5b is the first monomeric peptide of this length to display measurable exchange protection in water. Upon repeating the pH* 6.03 experiment with the addition of 30% TFE, protection factors increase — for example, Trp 25 Halt epsilon1 (t1/2 = 8 h and PF = 102.84) and Leu 26 HN (t1/2 = 30 h and PF = 103.15) — in agreement with the increased Tm observed by CD and NMR (Fig. 2d).

Trp cage folding cooperativity
We have reported19 a novel graphical test for folding cooperativity based on CSD values and chemical shift temperature gradients. For two-state structure/disorder equilibria, a linear correlation is expected between the CSDs observed at low temperatures and the Deltadelta/DeltaT values observed during the melting transition; the correlation coefficient is a measure of cooperativity. Excellent correlations are observed for NH shifts (data not shown) and for all Halpha resonances, with the ring-current shifted resonances appearing on the same line (Fig. 2c).

CD studies of melting (Fig. 2b) also indicate cooperativity. The melting transition midpoint is 42 °C in pH 7 aqueous buffer; CD measures of helix melting are in complete agreement with NMR CSD melting data from nonhelical portions of the Trp cage (Fig. 2d). TC5b also displays the classic hallmarks of cooperative unfolding in a guanidine-HCl denaturation titration ([guanidinium]1/2 = 2.2 M at 3 °C and DeltaGU = +8.6 (plusminus0.9) kJ mol-1; data not shown). This corresponds to 97.5% folded, in agreement with the value obtained from the Trp25-NHalt epsilon1 exchange protection factor (98.5%). The NH protection data, guanidine-HCl titration, thermal CD and NMR melting data are in remarkably good agreement, which would be expected only for a two-state folding process.

Structure in the absence of the Trp cage
A detailed analysis of thermal chemical shift changes in some of our constructs has revealed two instances of residual structure in states that lack the complete Trp cage. In the earlier constructs with a longer helix (TC1a/c and TC2), the retention of substantial helicity-induced shift deviations for all of the Halpha resonances in the alpha-helix upon heating is observed in 30% TFE and also (to a lesser extent) in aqueous buffer. The phenomenon is particularly pronounced for EX4. A direct comparison of the exchange rates for EX4 and TC5b in pH* 6.03 buffer with 30% TFE quantified this effect. The Trp 25-NHalt epsilon1 exchange half-lives are 3.0 and 8.0 h for EX4 and TC5b, respectively. For TC5b, only the backbone NH of Leu 26 exchange slower than 25-alt epsilon1. In the case of EX4, eight backbone NHs (all in the C-terminal section of the alpha-helix) remain after 25-alt epsilon1 was >85% exchanged. The backbone exchange rates for the Ile 23−Lys 27 segment of EX4 indicate a PF of 105.1 plusminus 0.7, which is 500-fold greater than the protection factor of the 25-alt epsilon1. Thus, in the case of EX4, Trp cage formation corresponds to the docking of the C-terminal (Pro)3 unit onto an exposed Trp side chain of a preformed helix.

In truncated, optimized Trp cage constructs, there is no evidence for retained helicity after thermal loss of tertiary structure; however, there are still some 'unexpected' CSD changes at Gly 30 and Pro 31 resonances upon melting and/or mutation. In the optimized constructs (TC5a/b), the Gly 30-CH2 displays dramatic stereo-selective shielding (3.43 for Halpha2 and 0.96 p.p.m. for Halpha3), and Pro 31-delta3 is modestly shifted (CSD = -0.26 to − 0.47 p.p.m.). In the unoptimized short constructs (and in constructs with a longer alpha-helical segment), 30-alpha3 CSDs are as large as -1.56 and 31-delta3 CSD values as large as -0.87 p.p.m. were observed. Furthermore, although all of the other Pro-delta resonances move uniformly toward their random coil values on melting, warming aqueous solutions of TC5a/b shifts the 31-delta3 resonance farther upfield (the outlier in Fig. 2c). A structural model of the unfolding of TC5b rationalizes these observations (Fig. 3d). A similar hydrophobic cluster between Trp 25 and Pro 31 may serve to C-cap the helix of EX4 in the DPC micelle-associated state that lacks tertiary structure15.

Implications
If the NMR structure ensemble correctly reflects the structure and the motions within the folded state energy, it should predict the chemical shifts. Ring current shift calculations were performed using SHIFTS 3.1 (http://www.scripps.edu/case/) and MOLMOL20. The structure predicts all of the >0.2 p.p.m. CSDs. For large CSDs due primarily to the indole ring, the observed values are within 14 plusminus 8 % (n = 10) of the SHIFTS 3.1 ring current predictions. Notably the highly stereo-specific CSDs of the Gly 30-CalphaH2 (—3.43 and −0.96 p.p.m. observed versus —3.17 plusminus 0.39 and —0.91 plusminus 0.17 calculated from the ensemble) and the large upfield shifts for Pro 37-Pro 38 sites are reproduced. The agreement obtained using the NMR ensemble is consistent with a structure that has relatively little additional motion and remains tightly packed about the indole ring. We have significantly lowered the size limit for a fully protein-like fold.

The potential for a coulombic interaction between Asp 28 and Arg 35 in the folded state is the basis for the N28D mutation. At pH 7, TC5a is 7.6 kJ mol-1 more stable than the TC3b. NMR-monitored pH titrations of TC5a/b suggest an Asp deprotonation DeltaDeltaG of 5.8−7.5 kJ mol-1. Similar fold stability increments have been observed upon the electrostatic optimization of protein surfaces21. We view the sequence remote coulombic interaction as the best rationale; however, additional studies are required to ascertain what portion, if any, of the stabilization is due to the pH-dependent, helix-favoring QXXXD interaction17.

The spectroscopic probe (primarily chemical shifts) and co-solvents used to monitor stability in this fold minimization and optimization study deserve some comment. CSD analysis seems to be optimal for studying fast folding systems at the peptide/protein borderline. There has been considerable controversy concerning the extent to which the peptide structuring effects of TFE and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP)22, 23 are pertinent to the 'native' states of peptides and proteins in water. Fluoroalcohol stabilization of helices has been known for decades, and more recent studies have extended this to beta-hairpins14, 24, 25 and beta-sheets10. With this report, fluoroalcohol-induced increases in 'native aqueous structure' populations have been observed for a system that owes its stability to a specific hydrophobic core (the Trp cage).

As previously noted15, the Trp-cage fold is an intramolecular example of a motif for binding Pro-rich segments to domains that are involved in signal transduction. Pro−Trp interactions may also be an effective strategy for fold stabilization. There is some analogy between the environment of our buried indole ring and that of Trp 11 in the Pin WW domain; Tyr 22-Trp 25-Pro 36-Pro 37-Pro 38 in the Trp cage equates with Tyr 23-Trp 11-Pro 8-Leu 7-Pro 37 in the WW domain9. Pro residues are advantageous because their inclusion serves to reduce the entropic advantage of the unfolded state. It is not coincidence that the smallest natural proteins also have Pro residues suspended over Trp side chains. Finally, Trp-cage constructs may prove to be a useful paradigm for protein folding studies in which both experiments and computational simulations are simplified by the small size of the structures. As the smallest protein-like system known, these systems should be an excellent testing ground for molecular dynamics simulations of protein unfolding and folding pathways.

Methods
Peptide synthesis.
The sample of EX4 has been described15. All other peptides were prepared using fast FMOC chemistry on an ABI 433A peptide synthesizer and purified by reversed-phase HPLC (C18 column) with a water + 0.1% TFA:acetonitrile + 0.085% TFA gradient. Purity and sequence were established from the NMR spectra.

CD spectroscopy and melting studies.
CD samples were prepared by dissolving weighed amounts (0.5−2 mg) of lyophilized peptides directly in 15 mM aqueous phosphate (pH 5.9−7.05) or phosphate-acetate (pH 3−4.5) buffer to produce approx600muM stock solutions (determined by UV at alt epsilon278 nm = 5,580 cm2 mmol-1 for Trp or 6,760 cm2 mmol-1 for Trp + Tyr). Quantitative serial dilutions to the required levels of fluoroalcohol and aqueous buffer were used. CD spectra were recorded in 1 and 10 mm path length cells (25−70 and 2−10 muM peptide concentrations, respectively) using a JASCO model J720 spectropolarimeter as reported26. CD spectral values for peptides are expressed in units of residue molar ellipticity (deg cm2 dmol-1).

NMR spectroscopy and structure ensemble generation.
Solution-state NMR samples were made by dissolving 2−3.5 mg lyophilized peptide in 450−500 mul aqueous buffer (as listed in CD methods) with 10% D2O for locking. Structuring shifts are reported as CSDs, experimental shift/random coil values19, with referencing to internal DSS. NOESY and TOCSY spectra were collected for all media, with solvent suppression accomplished using the WATERGATE pulse sequence27. All the spectra were collected on a Bruker DRX operating at 500 MHz and were readily and unambiguously assigned by standard methods28. The complete chemical shift assignments for TC5b in aqueous buffer with and without added TFE have been deposited (BMRB entry 5292). NOE intensities were converted to Å distances — short (2.0−3.0 Å), medium (2.5−3.5 Å), long (2.9−4.0 Å) or very long (3.3−5.0 Å) — and used in CNS29 protocol as described15. The weighting was 75 kcal Å-2 during the final minimization, which included a Lennard-Jones rather than purely repulsive van der Waals terms. The acceptance criteria, violations (none) and convergence statistics appear in Table 2. All structural figures in this report were prepared using MOLMOL20.

NH exchange studies and protection factor (PF) analysis.
Exchange rates were obtained from 1D spectra as the slopes of plots of ln (NH signal intensity) versus time. The experiments were performed at 7−9 °C by adding pre-cooled D2O buffer to the lyophilized peptide sample in a pre-cooled NMR tube. After brief vortex mixing, the sample was placed in the previously cooled and shimmed NMR probe for immediate data collection. Additional points were recorded first at 5−15 min intervals and then daily for long exchange times. Assignments for NHs that were still present 2−4 h after dissolution in D2O buffer were confirmed by 2D correlations. PF values were obtained using the protocols and coil reference values used for EX4 (ref. 15).

Coordinates.
Coordinates and NMR distance constraints have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (accession code 1L2Y).

 Top
Received 19 November 2001; Accepted 28 March 2002; Published online: 29 April 2002.

REFERENCES
  1. Dahiyat, B.I. & Mayo, S.L. Science 278, 82−87 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  2. Hill, R.B. & DeGrado, W.F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1138−1145 (1998). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Walsh, S.T.R., Cheng, H., Bryson, J.W., Roder, H. & DeGrado, W.F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5486−5491 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Ottesen, J.J. & Imperiali, B. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 535−539 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Cochran, A.G., Skelton, N.J. & Starovasnik, M.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5578−5583 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  6. Li, X., Sutcliffe, M.J., Schwartz, T.W. & Dobson, C.M. Biochemistry 31, 1245−1253 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Sudol, M. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 65, 113−132 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. McKnight, C.J., Doering, D.S., Matsudaira, P.T. & Kim, P.S. J. Mol. Biol. 260, 126−134 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Jager, M., Nguyen, H., Crane, J.C., Kelly, J.W. & Gruebele, M. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 373−393 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Kortemme, T., Ramírez-Alvarado, M. & Serrano, L. Science 281, 253−256 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. López de la Paz, M., Lacroix, E., Ramírez-Alvarado, M. & Serrano, L. J. Mol. Biol. 312, 229−246 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Schenck, H. & Gellman, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 4869−4870 (1998). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Maynard, A.J., Sharman, G.J. & Searle, M.S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1996−2007 (1998). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Andersen, N.H. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 9879−9880 (1999). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Neidigh, J.W., Fesinmeyer, R.M., Prickett, K.S. & Andersen, N.H. Biochemistry 40, 13188−13200 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Andersen, N.H. & Tong, H. Protein Sci. 6, 1920−1936 (1997). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Huyghues-Despointes, B.M., Klinger, T.M. & Baldwin, R.L. Biochemistry 34, 13267−13271 (1995). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  18. Muñoz, V. & Serrano, L. Biopolymers 41, 495−509 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  19. Andersen, N.H. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 8547−8561 (1997). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  20. Koradi, R., Billeter, M. & Wüthrich, K. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 51−55 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Loladze, V.V., Ibarra-Molero, B., Sanxhez-Ruiz, J.M. & Makhatadze, G.I. Biochemistry 38, 16419−16423 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Andersen, N.H., Cort, J.R., Liu, Z., Sjoberg, S.J. & Tong, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 10309−10310 (1996). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Walgers, R., Lee, T.C. & Cammers-Goodwin, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5073−5079 (1998). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. Blanco, F.J. & Serrano, L. Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 634−649 (1995). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Ramírez-Alvarado, M., Blanco, F.J. & Serrano, L. Protein Sci. 10, 1381−1392 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  26. Andersen, N.H., Liu, Z. & Prickett, K.S. FEBS Lett. 399, 47−52 (1996). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Piotto, M., Saudek, V. & Sklenar, V. J. Biomol. NMR 2, 661−665 (1992). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  28. Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids (John Wiley, New York; 1986).
  29. Brünger, A.T. et al. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905−921 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
 Top
Acknowledgments
Initial support came from a feasibility grant from the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund with continuing support from an NIH grant. We thank L. Serrano (EMBL-Heidelberg) for reminding us of the pH dependence of the helix-favoring QXXXD interaction.

Competing interests statement:  The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
Save this linkSave this link
More articles like this

naturejobs

Methods
Figures & Tables
Acknowledgments
References
See also: News and Views by Gellman & Woolfson
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
ISSN: 1545-9993
EISSN: 1545-9985
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians