Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Human immunoglobulin E flexes between acutely bent and extended conformations

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology volume 21, pages 397–404 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Crystallographic and solution studies have shown that IgE molecules are acutely bent in their Fc region. Crystal structures reveal the Cɛ2 domain pair folded back onto the Cɛ3-Cɛ4 domains, but is the molecule exclusively bent or can the Cɛ2 domains adopt extended conformations and even 'flip' from one side of the molecule to the other? We report the crystal structure of IgE-Fc captured in a fully extended, symmetrical conformation and show by molecular dynamics, calorimetry, stopped-flow kinetic, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analyses that the antibody can indeed adopt such extended conformations in solution. This diversity of conformational states available to IgE-Fc offers a new perspective on IgE function in allergen recognition, as part of the B-cell receptor and as a therapeutic target in allergic disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Bent and extended structures adopted by IgE-Fc.
Figure 2: Molecular dynamics simulation of IgE-Fc unbending.
Figure 3: ITC and FRET analyses of aɛFab binding to IgE-Fc.
Figure 4: Proposed mechanism of IgE-Fc flexibility and aɛFab binding in solution.
Figure 5: Structural basis for inhibition of IgE-Fc interaction with FcɛRIα by aɛFab.
Figure 6: Modeled structure of the entire IgE molecule in different biological contexts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Referenced accessions

Protein Data Bank

References

  1. Gould, H.J. & Sutton, B.J. IgE in allergy and asthma today. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 205–217 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Holgate, S.T., Djukanovic, R., Casale, T. & Bousquet, J. Anti-immunoglobulin E treatment with omalizumab in allergic diseases: an update on anti-inflammatory activity and clinical efficacy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 35, 408–416 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nezlin, R.S., Zagyansky, Y.A., Käiväräinen, A.I. & Stefani, D.V. Properties of myeloma immunoglobulin E(Yu) chemical, fluorescence polarisation and spin-labeled studies. Immunochemistry 10, 681–688 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sykulev, Y.K. & Nezlin, R.S. Spin labeling of immunoglobulin-M and immunoglobulin-E carbohydrates. Immunol. Lett. 5, 121–126 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oi, V.T. et al. Correlation between segmental flexibility and effector function of antibodies. Nature 307, 136–140 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng, Y., Shopes, B., Holowka, D. & Baird, B. Dynamic conformations compared for IgE and IgG1 in solution and bound to receptors. Biochemistry 31, 7446–7456 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holowka, D. & Baird, B. Structural studies on the membrane-bound immunoglobulin E-receptor complex. 2. Mapping of distances between sites on IgE and the membrane-surface. Biochemistry 22, 3475–3484 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holowka, D., Conrad, D.H. & Baird, B. Structural mapping of membrane-bound immunoglobulin-E receptor complexes: use of monoclonal anti-IgE antibodies to probe the conformation of receptor-bound IgE. Biochemistry 24, 6260–6267 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, Y., Shopes, B., Holowka, D. & Baird, B. Conformations of IgE bound to its receptor Fc-Epsilon-RI and in solution. Biochemistry 30, 9125–9132 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Padlan, E.A. & Davies, D.R. A model of the Fc of immunoglobulin-E. Mol. Immunol. 23, 1063–1075 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, K.G., Glennie, M., Harding, S.E. & Burton, D.R. A model for the solution conformation of rat IgE. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 18, 935–936 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beavil, A.J., Young, R.J., Sutton, B.J. & Perkins, S.J. Bent domain-structure of recombinant human IgE-Fc in solution by x-ray and neutron-scattering in conjunction with an automated curve-fitting procedure. Biochemistry 34, 14449–14461 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wan, T. et al. The crystal structure of IgE Fc reveals an asymmetrically bent conformation. Nat. Immunol. 3, 681–686 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holdom, M.D. et al. Conformational changes in IgE contribute to its uniquely slow dissociation rate from receptor Fc epsilon RI. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 571–576 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Holowka, D., Wensel, T. & Baird, B. A nanosecond fluorescence depolarization study on the segmental flexibility of receptor-bound immunoglobulin-E. Biochemistry 29, 4607–4612 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunt, J. et al. A fluorescent biosensor reveals conformational changes in human immunoglobulin E Fc: implications for mechanisms of receptor binding, inhibition, and allergen recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 17459–17470 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McDonnell, J.M. et al. The structure of the IgE C epsilon 2 domain and its role in stabilizing the complex with its high-affinity receptor Fc epsilon Rl alpha. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 437–441 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frey, G. et al. Distinct conformational states of HIV-1 gp41 are recognized by neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1486–1491 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wurzburg, B.A. & Jardetzky, T.S. Conformational flexibility in immunoglobulin E-Fc(3–4) revealed in multiple crystal forms. J. Mol. Biol. 393, 176–190 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barducci, A., Bussi, G. & Parrinello, M. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 020603 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laio, A. & Gervasio, F.L. Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science. Rep. Prog. Phys. 71, 126601 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crespo, Y., Marinelli, F., Pietrucci, F. & Laio, A. Metadynamics convergence law in a multidimensional system. Phys. Rev. E 81, 055701 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barducci, A., Bonomi, M. & Parrinello, M. Metadynamics. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 826–843 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Best, R.B., Chen, Y.G. & Hummer, G. Slow protein conformational dynamics from multiple experimental structures: the helix/sheet transition of arc repressor. Structure 13, 1755–1763 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Whitford, P.C., Miyashita, O., Levy, Y. & Onuchic, J.N. Conformational transitions of adenylate kinase: switching by cracking. J. Mol. Biol. 366, 1661–1671 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitford, P.C., Sanbonmatsu, K.Y. & Onuchic, J.N. Biomolecular dynamics: order-disorder transitions and energy landscapes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076601 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fenley, A.T., Muddana, H.S. & Gilson, M.K. Entropy-enthalpy transduction caused by conformational shifts can obscure the forces driving protein-ligand binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20006–20011 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Koshland, D.E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44, 98–104 (1958).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Monod, J., Wyman, J. & Changeux, J.P. On nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12, 88–118 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wlodarski, T. & Zagrovic, B. Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19346–19351 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Garman, S.C., Wurzburg, B.A., Tarchevskaya, S.S., Kinet, J.P. & Jardetzky, T.S. Structure of the Fc fragment of human IgE bound to its high-affinity receptor Fc epsilon RI alpha. Nature 406, 259–266 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roux, K.H., Strelets, L., Brekke, O.H., Sandlie, I. & Michaelsen, T.E. Comparisons of the ability of human IgG3 hinge mutants, IgM, IgE, and IgA2, to form small immune complexes: a role for flexibility and geometry. J. Immunol. 161, 4083–4090 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Teplyakov, A., Zhao, Y., Malia, T.J., Obmolova, G. & Gilliland, G.L. IgG2 Fc structure and the dynamic features of the IgG CH2–CH3 interface. Mol. Immunol. 56, 131–139 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dhaliwal, B. et al. Crystal structure of IgE bound to its B-cell receptor CD23 reveals a mechanism of reciprocal allosteric inhibition with high affinity receptor Fc epsilon RI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12686–12691 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Feinstein, A. & Munn, E.A. Conformation of the free and antigen-bound IgM antibody molecules. Nature 224, 1307–1309 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perkins, S.J., Nealis, A.S., Sutton, B.J. & Feinstein, A. Solution structure of human and mouse immunoglobulin M by synchrotron X-ray scattering and molecular graphics modelling. A possible mechanism for complement activation. J. Mol. Biol. 221, 1345–1366 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holowka, D.A. & Cathou, R.E. Conformation of immunoglobulin-M. 2. Nanosecond fluorescence depolarization analysis of segmental flexibility in anti-epsilon-1-dimethylamino-5-naphthalenesulfonyl-L-lysine anti-immunoglobulin from horse, pig, and shark. Biochemistry 15, 3379–3390 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Czajkowsky, D.M. & Shao, Z. The human IgM pentamer is a mushroom-shaped molecule with a flexural bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14960–14965 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Müller, R. et al. High-resolution structures of the IgM Fc domains reveal principles of its hexamer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10183–10188 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Shoemaker, B.A., Portman, J.J. & Wolynes, P.G. Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8868–8873 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tolar, P., Sohn, H.W., Liu, W. & Pierce, S.K. The molecular assembly and organization of signaling active B-cell receptor oligomers. Immunol. Rev. 232, 34–41 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tolar, P. & Pierce, S.K. A conformation-induced oligomerization model for B cell receptor microclustering and signaling. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 340, 155–169 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Radaev, S. et al. Structural and functional studies of Ig alpha beta and its assembly with the B cell antigen receptor. Structure 18, 934–943 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Whitford, P.C., Onuchic, J.N. & Sanbonmatsu, K.Y. Connecting energy landscapes with experimental rates for aminoacyl-tRNA accommodation in the ribosome. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13170–13171 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim, B. et al. Accelerated disassembly of IgE-receptor complexes by a disruptive macromolecular inhibitor. Nature 491, 613–617 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonomi, M. et al. PLUMED: a portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1961–1972 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Winter, G. Xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kabsch, W. Automatic processing of rotational diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 795–800 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kabsch, W. Evaluation of single-crystal x-ray-diffraction data from a position-sensitive detector. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 916–924 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kabsch, W. Automatic-indexing of rotation diffraction patterns. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 67–71 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sauter, N.K., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W. & Adams, P.D. Robust indexing for automatic data collection. J. Appl. Cryst. allogr 37, 399–409 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. 62, 72–82 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, Z., Sauter, N.K., van den Bedem, H., Snell, G. & Deacon, A.M. Automated diffraction image analysis and spot searching for high-throughput crystal screening. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 112–119 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Winn, M.D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. McCoy, A.J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Schwarzenbacher, R., Godzik, A., Grzechnik, S.K. & Jaroszewski, L. The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 1229–1236 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Stein, N. CHAINSAW: a program for mutating pdb files used as templates in molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 641–643 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Adams, P.D. et al. The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures. Methods 55, 94–106 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen, V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lütteke, T., Frank, M. & von der Lieth, C.W. Carbohydrate Structure Suite (CSS): analysis of carbohydrate 3D structures derived from the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D242–D246 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hayward, S. & Berendsen, H.J.C. Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: new results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 30, 144–154 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF chimera: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Phillips, J.C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Darden, T., Perera, L., Li, L.P. & Pedersen, L. New tricks for modelers from the crystallography toolkit: the particle mesh Ewald algorithm and its use in nucleic acid simulations. Structure 7, R55–R60 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Howarth, M. & Ting, A.Y. Imaging proteins in live mammalian cells with biotin ligase and monovalent streptavidin. Nat. Protoc. 3, 534–545 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Myszka, D.G. Improving biosensor analysis. J. Mol. Recognit. 12, 279–284 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pham, E., Chiang, J., Li, I., Shum, W. & Truong, K. A computational tool for designing FRET protein biosensors by rigid-body sampling of their conformational space. Structure 15, 515–523 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Medical Research Council UK (G1100090; B.J.S.) and The Wellcome Trust for grant funding (076343; B.J.S.) and support for the King's Biomolecular Spectroscopy Centre (085944). The work was carried out with the support of Asthma UK, the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Center and the Diamond Light Source (Harwell, UK).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nyssa Drinkwater and Benjamin P Cossins: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London, UK

    Nyssa Drinkwater, Anthony H Keeble, Michael W-P Kao, James M McDonnell, Andrew J Beavil & Brian J Sutton

  2. Medical Research Council and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK

    Nyssa Drinkwater, Anthony H Keeble, Michael W-P Kao, James M McDonnell, Andrew J Beavil & Brian J Sutton

  3. UCB Pharma, Slough, UK

    Benjamin P Cossins, Michael Wright, Katharine Cain, Hanna Hailu, Amanda Oxbrow, Jean Delgado, Lindsay K Shuttleworth & Alistair J Henry

Authors
  1. Nyssa Drinkwater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin P Cossins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anthony H Keeble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katharine Cain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hanna Hailu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amanda Oxbrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jean Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lindsay K Shuttleworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael W-P Kao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. James M McDonnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Andrew J Beavil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Alistair J Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Brian J Sutton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.D. and B.P.C. contributed equally to this work. N.D. performed the crystallography and structure analysis, N.D. and J.M.M. conducted SPR experiments, and N.D. and B.J.S. wrote the manuscript. B.C. undertook the molecular dynamics and contributed to writing. A.H.K. was responsible for the ITC and stopped-flow analyses, M.W. generated the aɛFab molecule, K.C. performed antibody engineering, H.H. expressed the proteins, A.O. purified the proteins, J.D. and L.K.S. collected intramolecular FRET data using reagents made by M.W.-P.K., and A.J.H. J.M.M., A.J.H. and A.J.B. contributed to writing, data interpretation. B.J.S. designed and supervised the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J Sutton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Conformational flexibility of the Cɛ3 domains.

(a) Directions of “open/closed” and “swing” movements between the Cɛ3 domains are indicated on the free IgE-Fc structure (2WQR, Cɛ2 domains not shown for clarity). IgE-FcA is shown in blue, IgE-FcB in orange. (b) Conformational change of the Cɛ3 domains of IgE-Fc upon aɛFab binding. The Cɛ3 and Cɛ4 domains of the extended IgE-Fc structure as seen in the aɛFab complex (IgE-FcA in blue, IgE-FcB in orange) are overlaid on the Cɛ3 and Cɛ4 domains of free IgE-Fc (grey) (Cɛ2 domains not shown for clarity). In the structure of free IgE-Fc, IgE-FcA is in the closed conformation, and IgE-FcB is in the open conformation, while in the extended IgE-Fc structure, both chains are open. Open (extended IgE-Fc) and closed (free IgE-Fc) forms of IgE-FcA are indicated.

Supplementary Figure 2 Interactions between aɛFab and IgE-Fc.

(a) Interactions between aɛFab1 heavy chain (green) and the Cɛ2 domain of IgE-FcA (blue). Hydrogen bonds are indicated by black lines. (b) Contact between IgE-Fc Cɛ2-Cɛ3 linker regions and the aɛFab molecules. IgE-FcA is shown in blue and IgE-FcB in orange; aɛFab1 and aɛFab2 are shown in green. The locations of the Cɛ2 and Cɛ3 domains are indicated. (c) R393 binding pocket between aɛFab heavy (green) and light (grey) chains. Black lines indicate hydrogen bonds formed with aɛFab residues. (d) The interactions between R393 and aɛFab residues. (e) Stereo image of 2Fo–Fc electron density at 1σ contour level for residues around R393 (shown in orange in the center of the image) at the interface between IgE-FcB (orange) and aɛFab2 (green).

Supplementary Figure 3 Representation of the collective motions used as collective variables in the metadynamics simulation of Figure 2.

(a) Black arrow indicates collective motion 1 (x-axis in Figure 2), with the middle structure representing x=0. (b) Black arrow indicates collective motion 2 (y-axis in Figure 2) with the two structures representing the extremes explored across x=0. This motion is principally a twisting of (Cɛ2)2 relative to the Cɛ3-Cɛ4 domains. (c) Free-energy surface representing the IgE-Fc unbending process generated through metadynamics simulation. Axes show the projection along the two lowest frequency collective motions (extracted from a biased trajectory, as for Fig. 2a). This plot shows the features of the surface within 40 kJ/mol of the lowest free-energy minimum, contoured every 2.5 kJ/mol and coloured accordingly. (d) Short unbiased simulation starting from the extended conformation of IgE-Fc (Fig. 1c) in the crystal structure of the complex. The simulation was run for 250 ns and the trajectory is represented by a black line plotted over the free-energy surface (Fig. 2a). The simulation started at x = –0.4, y = 7.6 (indicated with black cross) and was terminated at x = 3.1, y = –7.3 (black circle). This trajectory is consistent with the small energy barriers surrounding the extended conformation.

Supplementary Figure 4 Stopped-flow kinetic analysis of aɛFab binding to IgE-Fc.

Kinetic binding curves showing the change in fluorescence when (a) aɛFab binds to IgE-Fc and (b) aɛFab binds to Fcɛ3-4. The red traces indicate experiments carried out with IgE-Fc or Fcɛ3-4 in excess over aɛFab, and the black traces are experiments with aɛFab in excess over IgE-Fc or Fcɛ3-4. The kinetic binding parameters demonstrate a linear concentration dependence for aɛFab binding to IgE-Fc (c and d) and Fcɛ3-4 (e and f).

Supplementary Figure 5 SPR analysis of aɛFab1–IgE-Fc and aɛFab1–IgE-Fc–aɛFab2 complex formation, and inhibition of sFcɛRIα binding by aɛFab1.

(a) SPR sensorgrams of IgE-Fc binding to immobilized aɛFab. IgE-Fc was injected over the surface at concentrations of 78 (orange), 156 (green), 313 (purple), 625 (magenta), 1250 (blue), 2500 (red), and 5000 nM (black). Data are fit to an equilibrium model of single site binding (inset). (b) aɛFab binds to pre-bound aɛFab1–IgE-Fc complex to form aɛFab1–IgE-Fc–aɛFab2. aɛFab was injected over the aɛFab1–IgE-Fc surface at concentrations of 0 (purple), 78 (orange), 156 (green), 313 (purple), 625 (magenta), 1250 (blue), 2500 (red), and 5000 nM (black). Inset shows aɛFab2 binding normalised with respect to the buffer only control (purple). (c) When IgE-Fc is bound to aɛFab1 on the SPR surface, sFcɛRIα is not able to bind. Inset shows sFcɛRIα binding normalised with respect to buffer only control. sFcɛRIα was injected over the aɛFab1–IgE-Fc surface at concentrations of 0 (orange), 31.3 (green), 62.5 (purple), 125 (magenta), 250 (blue), 500 (red), and 1000 nM (black).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 (PDF 2609 kb)

The structure of IgE-Fc bound symmetrically by two aɛFab molecules.

IgE-FcA is shown in blue and IgE-FcB in orange; aɛFab heavy chains are shown in green and light chains in grey. Also shown is the extended conformation of IgE-Fc as seen in the complex, which undergoes an “unbending” of 120° compared to the free structure. The unbending derives largely from hinge movement in the Cɛ2-Cɛ3 linker region (residues P333, R334, G335) as shown. (MOV 5434 kb)

The existence of an unbent conformation of IgE-Fc in the aɛFab complex suggests that the molecule may pass through an extended state as it flips between the two bent conformations.

This potential motion is shown in two orthogonal orientations, with IgE-FcA in blue and IgE-FcB in orange. (MOV 12543 kb)

Proposed mechanism of IgE-Fc flexibility and aɛFab binding in solution.

IgE-Fc is predominantly bent in solution, but (Cɛ2)2 may be capable of flipping from one side of the molecule to the other. aɛFab1 engages at either exposed binding site of IgE-Fc, attaching to the Cɛ3 domain, and limiting the range of accessible conformations. aɛFab2 engages while IgE-Fc transiently occupies the extended conformation, capturing the molecule in a symmetrical state. (MOV 3089 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drinkwater, N., Cossins, B., Keeble, A. et al. Human immunoglobulin E flexes between acutely bent and extended conformations. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21, 397–404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2795

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2795

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing