Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

5-hmC in the brain is abundant in synaptic genes and shows differences at the exon-intron boundary

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology volume 19, pages 1037–1043 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) derivative 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) is abundant in the brain for unknown reasons. Here we characterize the genomic distribution of 5-hmC and 5-mC in human and mouse tissues. We assayed 5-hmC by using glucosylation coupled with restriction-enzyme digestion and microarray analysis. We detected 5-hmC enrichment in genes with synapse-related functions in both human and mouse brain. We also identified substantial tissue-specific differential distributions of these DNA modifications at the exon-intron boundary in human and mouse. This boundary change was mainly due to 5-hmC in the brain but due to 5-mC in non-neural contexts. This pattern was replicated in multiple independent data sets and with single-molecule sequencing. Moreover, in human frontal cortex, constitutive exons contained higher levels of 5-hmC relative to alternatively spliced exons. Our study suggests a new role for 5-hmC in RNA splicing and synaptic function in the brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Measurement assay for 5-hmC, array validation and relationship to steady-state mRNA levels.
Figure 2: Levels of 5-hmC in mouse and human brains is higher in synapse-related genes than in other genes.
Figure 3: 5-hmC marks exon-intron boundaries in the human brain, and 5-mC marks those in the human liver.
Figure 4: 5-hmC marks exon-intron boundaries in the mouse brain but not in mouse organs of non-neural origin.
Figure 5: Constitutive exons have higher 5-hmC levels than do alternatively-spliced exons in human brain.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Kriaucionis, S. & Heintz, N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 324, 929–930 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Penn, N.W., Suwalski, R., O′Riley, C., Bojanowski, K. & Yura, R. The presence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in animal deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem. J. 126, 781–790 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930–935 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, Y. et al. The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing. PLoS ONE 5, e8888 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Globisch, D. et al. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS ONE 5, e15367 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deaton, A.M. & Bird, A. CpG islands and the regulation of transcription. Genes Dev. 25, 1010–1022 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin, S.-G., Wu, X., Li, A.X. & Pfeifer, G.P. Genomic mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the human brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5015–5024 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Song, C.-X. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 68–72 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, J.U., Su, Y., Zhong, C., Ming, G.L. & Song, H. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell 145, 423–434 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. He, Y.F. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303–1307 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, S. et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333, 1300–1303 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, L. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase specifically recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine-modified DNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 328–330 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, L.H., Farnet, C.M., Ehrlich, K.C. & Ehrlich, M. Digestion of highly modified bacteriophage DNA by restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 1579–1591 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Josse, J. & Kornberg, A. Glucosylation of deoxyribonucleic acid. III. α- and β-glucosyl transferases from T4-infected Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 237, 1968–1976 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, X.S. Getting started in tiling microarray analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 3, 1842–1844 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Potter, D.P., Yan, P., Huang, T.H.M. & Lin, S. Probe signal correction for differential methylation hybridization experiments. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 453 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lattin, J.E. et al. Expression analysis of G protein-coupled receptors in mouse macrophages. Immunome Res. 4, 5 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, D.W., Sherman, B.T. & Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cahoy, J.D. et al. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J. Neurosci. 28, 264–278 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Balsa-Canto, E. & Banga, J.R. AMIGO, a toolbox for advanced model identification in systems biology using global optimization. Bioinformatics 27, 2311–2313 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chodavarapu, R.K. et al. Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 466, 388–392 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laurent, L. et al. Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res. 20, 320–331 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Torrey, E.F., Webster, M., Knable, M., Johnston, N. & Yolken, R.H. The Stanley Foundation brain collection and neuropathology consortium. Schizophr. Res. 44, 151–155 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart, C. et al. Single-molecule sequencing: sequence methods to enable accurate quantitation. Methods Enzymol. 472, 407–430 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ou, J.N. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A induces global and gene-specific DNA demethylation in human cancer cell lines. Biochem. Pharmacol. 73, 1297–1307 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hnilicová, J. et al. Histone deacetylase activity modulates alternative splicing. PLoS ONE 6, e16727 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brawand, D. et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 478, 343–348 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Davis, T. & Vaisvila, R. High sensitivity 5-hydroxymethylcytosine detection in Balb/C brain tissue. J. Vis. Exp. 48, e2661 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jin, S.-G., Kadam, S. & Pfeifer, G.P. Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e125 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kondo, E., Gu, Z., Horii, A. & Fukushige, S. The thymine DNA glycosylase MBD4 represses transcription and is associated with methylated p16(INK4a) and hMLH1 genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 4388–4396 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Valinluck, V. et al. Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2). Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4100–4108 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng, J. et al. Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 423–430 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, C.A. & Sweatt, J.D. Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation. Neuron 53, 857–869 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Szulwach, K.E. et al. 5-hmC-mediated epigenetic dynamics during postnatal neurodevelopment and aging. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1607–1616 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chodavarapu, R.K. et al. Relationship between nucleosome positioning and DNA methylation. Nature 466, 388–392 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hodges, E. et al. High definition profiling of mammalian DNA methylation by array capture and single molecule bisulfite sequencing. Genome Res. 19, 1593–1605 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly, W.K. et al. Phase I study of an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, in patients with advanced cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3923–3931 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kolasinska-Zwierz, P. et al. Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nat. Genet. 41, 376–381 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz, S., Meshorer, E. & Ast, G. Chromatin organization marks exon-intron structure. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 990–995 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tilgner, H. et al. Nucleosome positioning as a determinant of exon recognition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 996–1001 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Luco, R.F. et al. Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science 327, 996–1000 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Andersson, R., Enroth, S., Rada-Iglesias, A., Wadelius, C. & Komorowski, J. Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications. Genome Res. 19, 1732–1741 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kolasinska-Zwierz, P. et al. Differential chromatin marking of introns and expressed exons by H3K36me3. Nat. Genet. 41, 376–381 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Shukla, S. et al. CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing. Nature 479, 74–79 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Irimia, M. & Blencowe, B.J. Alternative splicing: decoding an expansive regulatory layer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3, 323–332 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Luco, R.F., Allo, M., Schor, I.E., Kornblihtt, A.R. & Misteli, T. Epigenetics in alternative pre-mRNA splicing. Cell 144, 16–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Jin, S.-G., Kadam, S. & Pfeifer, G.P. Examination of the specificity of DNA methylation profiling techniques towards 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e125 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tardy-Planechaud, S., Fujimoto, J., Lin, S.S. & Sowers, L.C. Solid phase synthesis and restriction endonuclease cleavage of oligodeoxynucleotides containing 5-(hydroxymethyl)-cytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 553–559 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Larivière, L., Kurzeck, J., Aschke-Sonnenborn, U., Ruger, W. & Morera, S. Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic study of a ternary complex between the T4 phage beta-glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucose and a DNA fragment containing an abasic site. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1484–1486 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ichiyanagi, K. Inhibition of MspI cleavage activity by hydroxymethylation of the CpG site: a concern for DNA modification studies using restriction endonucleases. Epigenetics 7, 131–136 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Gentleman, R.C. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D.V., Shiboski, S.C. & McCulloch, C.E. Repeated Measures Analysis, in Regression Methods in Biostatistics Ch. 8, 253–290 (Springer, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Miller and C. Austin (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) for providing cell lines for the SAHA experiment. We also thank J.-S. Doucet (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Toronto, Canada) for assistance with mouse brain sample preparation. This research has been supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grants 199170 and 186007) and the US National Institutes of Health (grants MH074127, MH088413, DP3DK085698, HG005758 and HG004535) to A.P. and Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants to B.J.B., by the Research Council of Lithuania and the French Ministry of Foreign and European affairs under the Lithuania-France bilateral collaboration program Gilibert (grant TAP-13/2011–2012) to S.M. and S.K., and by the European Social Fund under the Global Grant measure (grant VP1-3.1-ŠMM-07-K-01-105) to S.K. A.P. is supported as a Tapscott Chair in Schizophrenia Studies at the University of Toronto and by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation. M.I. is supported by a Human Frontier Science Program Organization Long Term Fellowship.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tarang Khare and Shraddha Pai: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Krembil Family Epigenetics Laboratory, The Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Tarang Khare, Shraddha Pai, Karolis Koncevicius, Mrinal Pal, Peixin Jia, Carolyn Ptak, Sun Chong Wang, Viviane Labrie & Arturas Petronis

  2. Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Karolis Koncevicius

  3. Department of Biological DNA Modification, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

    Edita Kriukiene, Zita Liutkeviciute & Saulius Klimasauskas

  4. The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Manuel Irimia & Benjamin J Blencowe

  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

    Menghang Xia

  6. Division of the National Toxicology Program Biomolecular Screening Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA

    Raymond Tice

  7. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Mamoru Tochigi

  8. Laboratoire d'Enzymologie et Biochimie Structurales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

    Solange Moréra

  9. Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Anaies Nazarians & Denise Belsham

  10. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Anaies Nazarians & Denise Belsham

  11. Neuroscience Department, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Albert H C Wong

  12. Institute of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan

    Sun Chong Wang

  13. St. Laurent Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Philipp Kapranov

  14. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Rafal Kustra

Authors
  1. Tarang Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shraddha Pai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karolis Koncevicius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mrinal Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edita Kriukiene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zita Liutkeviciute
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Manuel Irimia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Peixin Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carolyn Ptak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Menghang Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Raymond Tice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mamoru Tochigi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Solange Moréra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Anaies Nazarians
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Denise Belsham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Albert H C Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Benjamin J Blencowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Sun Chong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Philipp Kapranov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Rafal Kustra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Viviane Labrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Saulius Klimasauskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Arturas Petronis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.K., A.P., T.K. and S.P. conceived of the study and designed the experiments. S.M., E.K., Z.L. and S.K. developed and verified the methods for 5-hmC detection. T.K., M.P., M.T., P.J., C.P., V.L., A.N., D.B. and A.H.C.W. conducted the microarray experiments. S.P., K.K., P.K., S.C.W. and R.K. developed bioinformatics methods and analyzed microarray data. P.K., T.K., S.P. and A.P. contributed to the design and data analysis of the Helicos sequencing experiment. M.X. and R.T. generated SAHA-treated cell lines. M.I. and B.J.B. generated the lists of alternative and constitutive exons and performed 5-hmC comparisons. T.K., S.P., V.L., S.K. and A.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Saulius Klimasauskas or Arturas Petronis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–9, Supplementary Tables 1–15, and Supplementary Notes 1 and 2 (PDF 4363 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khare, T., Pai, S., Koncevicius, K. et al. 5-hmC in the brain is abundant in synaptic genes and shows differences at the exon-intron boundary. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19, 1037–1043 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2372

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing