Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Conformational dynamics of single pre-mRNA molecules during in vitro splicing

Abstract

The spliceosome is a complex small nuclear RNA (snRNA)-protein machine that removes introns from pre-mRNAs via two successive phosphoryl transfer reactions. The chemical steps are isoenergetic, yet splicing requires at least eight RNA-dependent ATPases responsible for substantial conformational rearrangements. To comprehensively monitor pre-mRNA conformational dynamics, we developed a strategy for single-molecule FRET (smFRET) that uses a small, efficiently spliced yeast pre-mRNA, Ubc4, in which donor and acceptor fluorophores are placed in the exons adjacent to the 5′ and 3′ splice sites. During splicing in vitro, we observed a multitude of generally reversible time- and ATP-dependent conformational transitions of individual pre-mRNAs. The conformational dynamics of branchpoint and 3′–splice site mutants differ from one another and from wild type. Because all transitions are reversible, spliceosome assembly appears to be occurring close to thermal equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Splicing activity of different Ubc4 pre-mRNA variants.
Figure 3: Data analysis and examples of analysis.
Figure 4: Conformational dynamics of WT, 3′SS and BP pre-mRNA substrates in splicing buffer.
Figure 5: ATP-dependent conformational dynamics of the WT, 3′SS and BP pre-mRNAs in yeast cell extract.
Figure 6: Mapping conformational changes of the WT pre-mRNA during spliceosome assembly and splicing in vitro.
Figure 7: Mapping conformational changes of the 3′SS pre-mRNA spliceosome assembly and splicing in vitro.
Figure 8: Mapping conformational changes of the BP pre-mRNA spliceosome assembly and splicing in vitro.
Figure 9: Detailed comparison of kinetic and conformational profiles of pre-mRNAs during spliceosome assembly and splicing in vitro.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jurica, M.S. & Moore, M.J. Pre-mRNA splicing: awash in a sea of proteins. Mol. Cell 12, 5–14 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wahl, M.C., Will, C.L. & Luhrmann, R. The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 136, 701–718 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Staley, J.P. & Guthrie, C. Mechanical devices of the spliceosome: motors, clocks, springs, and things. Cell 92, 315–326 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, S.M. & Guthrie, C. A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing fidelity: the RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs usage of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell 73, 1377–1391 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Couto, J.R., Tamm, J., Parker, R. & Guthrie, C. A trans-acting suppressor restores splicing of a yeast intron with a branch point mutation. Genes Dev. 1, 445–455 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayas, R.M., Maita, H. & Staley, J.P. Exon ligation is proofread by the DExD/H-box ATPase Prp22p. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 482–490 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, Y.Z. & Query, C.C. Competition between the ATPase Prp5 and branch region–U2 snRNA pairing modulates the fidelity of spliceosome assembly. Mol. Cell 28, 838–849 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Walter, N.G., Huang, C.Y., Manzo, A.J. & Sobhy, M.A. Do-it-yourself guide: how to use the modern single-molecule toolkit. Nat. Methods 5, 475–489 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Furman, E. & Glitz, D.G. Purification of the spliceosome A-complex and its visualization by electron microscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15515–15522 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jurica, M.S., Licklider, L.J., Gygi, S.R., Grigorieff, N. & Moore, M.J. Purification and characterization of native spliceosomes suitable for three-dimensional structural analysis. RNA 8, 426–439 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kent, O.A. & MacMillan, A.M. Early organization of pre-mRNA during spliceosome assembly. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 576–581 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman, A.J., Teigelkamp, S. & Beggs, J.D. snRNA interactions at 5′ and 3′ splice sites monitored by photoactivated crosslinking in yeast spliceosomes. RNA 1, 968–980 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, R.J., Newman, A.J., Cheng, S.C. & Abelson, J. Yeast mRNA splicing in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 14780–14792 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vijayraghavan, U., Company, M. & Abelson, J. Isolation and characterization of pre–mRNA splicing mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 3, 1206–1216 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Clark, T.A., Sugnet, C.W. & Ares, M. Jr. Genomewide analysis of mRNA processing in yeast using splicing-specific microarrays. Science 296, 907–910 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pleiss, J.A., Whitworth, G.B., Bergkessel, M. & Guthrie, C. Transcript specificity in yeast pre-mRNA splicing revealed by mutations in core spliceosomal components. PLoS Biol. 5, e90 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vijayraghavan, U. et al. Mutations in conserved intron sequences affect multiple steps in the yeast splicing pathway, particularly assembly of the spliceosome. EMBO J. 5, 1683–1695 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rueda, D. et al. Single-molecule enzymology of RNA: essential functional groups impact catalysis from a distance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10066–10071 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ditzler, M.A., Rueda, D., Mo, J., Hakansson, K. & Walter, N.G. A rugged free energy landscape separates multiple functional RNA folds throughout denaturation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 7088–7099 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pereira, M.J. et al. Single vs. ribozyme molecules reveal dynamic and hierarchical folding toward catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 382, 496–509 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. de Silva, C. & Walter, N.G. Leakage and slow allostery limit performance of single drug-sensing aptazyme molecules based on the hammerhead ribozyme. RNA 15, 76–84 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartel, D.P. & Szostak, J.W. Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science 261, 1411–1418 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Munro, J.B., Altman, R.B., O'Connor, N. & Blanchard, S.C. Identification of two distinct hybrid state intermediates on the ribosome. Mol. Cell 25, 505–517 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McKinney, S.A., Joo, C. & Ha, T. Analysis of single-molecule FRET trajectories using hidden Markov modeling. Biophys. J. 91, 1941–1951 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwer, B. A conformational rearrangement in the spliceosome sets the stage for Prp22-dependent mRNA release. Mol. Cell 30, 743–754 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crawford, D.J., Hoskins, A.A., Friedman, L.J., Gelles, J. & Moore, M.J. Visualizing the splicing of single pre-mRNA molecules in whole cell extract. RNA 14, 170–179 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737–741 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Seraphin, B. & Rosbash, M. Identification of functional U1 snRNA–pre-mRNA complexes committed to spliceosome assembly and splicing. Cell 59, 349–358 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stevens, S.W. et al. Composition and functional characterization of the yeast spliceosomal penta-snRNP. Mol. Cell 9, 31–44 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maroney, P.A., Romfo, C.M. & Nilsen, T.W. Functional recognition of 5′ splice site by U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP defines a novel ATP-dependent step in early spliceosome assembly. Mol. Cell 6, 317–328 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, D.J. & Konarska, M.M. Mechanistic insights from reversible splicing catalysis. RNA 14, 1975–1978 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tseng, C.K. & Cheng, S.C. Both catalytic steps of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing are reversible. Science 320, 1782–1784 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cornish, P.V., Ermolenko, D.N., Noller, H.F. & Ha, T. Spontaneous intersubunit rotation in single ribosomes. Mol. Cell 30, 578–588 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stark, M.R., Pleiss, J.A., Deras, M., Scaringe, S.A. & Rader, S.D. An RNA ligase–mediated method for the efficient creation of large, synthetic RNAs. RNA 12, 2014–2019 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stevens, S.W. & Abelson, J. Yeast pre-mRNA splicing: methods, mechanisms, and machinery. Methods Enzymol. 351, 200–220 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ha, T. et al. Initiation and re-initiation of DNA unwinding by the Escherichia coli Rep helicase. Nature 419, 638–641 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. van Oijen, A.M. et al. Single-molecule kinetics of lambda exonuclease reveal base dependence and dynamic disorder. Science 301, 1235–1238 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhuang, X. et al. Correlating structural dynamics and function in single ribozyme molecules. Science 296, 1473–1476 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rasnik, I., McKinney, S.A. & Ha, T. Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Nat. Methods 3, 891–893 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank R. Lührmann and P. Fabrizio (Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry), J. Staley (Univ. Chicago) and B. Schwer (Weill Cornell Medical College) for providing splicing active yeast cell extracts at a moment, common in this field, in which we were having difficulty in making active extracts, as well as G. Whitworth, J. Staley and H. Hadjivassiliou for helpful comments on the manuscript. The oligonucleotides synthesized at Dharmacon were sometimes much longer than those they usually make, and their excellent quality was essential for this project. The work at the University of Michigan was supported by US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant GM062357 to N.G.W. and NIH Cellular & Molecular Biology and Molecular Biophysics Training Grant fellowships to M.B. and M.A.D., respectively, as well as a Rackham Merit Fellowship to M.B. The work at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), was supported by an American Cancer Society Research Professor of Molecular Genetics award to C.G., by NIH grant GM021119 to C.G., by NIH postdoctoral fellowship GM077844 to C.M. and by a grant from the Agouron Institute to J.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.A. worked at the bench and led the development of the Ubc4 system at UCSF; J.A.P. and J.A. performed the microarray analysis in Supplementary Table 1; D.E.R., T.V. and C.M. participated in various phases of the biochemistry at UCSF; M.B., M.A.D., F.F. and M.W. performed the smFRET experimentation and data analysis; P.A. performed the secondary structure analysis at the University of Michigan; J.A., M.A.D., M.B., C.M., C.G. and N.G.W. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to John Abelson or Nils G Walter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Methods (PDF 7415 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abelson, J., Blanco, M., Ditzler, M. et al. Conformational dynamics of single pre-mRNA molecules during in vitro splicing. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17, 504–512 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1767

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing