Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
Supplements
Focus
Guide to authors
Online submissionOnline submission
Permissions
For referees
Free online issue
Contact the journal
Subscribe
Advertising
work@npg
naturereprints
About this site
For librarians
 
NPG Resources
Nature
Nature Cell Biology
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
The EMBO Journal
Nature Reports Avian Flu
NPG Subject areas
Biotechnology
Cancer
Chemistry
Clinical Medicine
Dentistry
Development
Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology
Genetics
Immunology
Materials Science
Medical Research
Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience
Pharmacology
Physics
Browse all publications
Perspective
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology  11, 1044 - 1048 (2004)
Published online: 2 November 2004; | doi:10.1038/nsmb852

Assembling the mitochondrial outer membrane

Nikolaus Pfanner1, Nils Wiedemann1, Chris Meisinger1 & Trevor Lithgow2

1 Institut für Biochemie und Molekularbiologie, Universität Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Str. 7, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.

2 Russell Grimwade School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

Correspondence should be addressed to Nikolaus Pfanner Nikolaus.Pfanner@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de or Chris Meisinger Christof.Meisinger@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de
The general preprotein translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM complex) transports virtually all mitochondrial precursor proteins, but cannot assemble outer-membrane precursors into functional complexes. A recently discovered sorting and assembly machinery (SAM complex) is essential for integration and assembly of outer-membrane proteins, revealing unexpected connections to mitochondrial evolution and morphology.
Mitochondria are not only of central importance for the bioenergetics of eukaryotic cells but have critical functions in the metabolism of amino acids and lipids, in the biosynthesis of heme and Fe-S clusters, and in apoptosis1, 2, 3, 4. Mitochondria contain about 800 (yeast)1 to 1,500 different proteins (human)2. Although mitochondria contain a complete genetic system in their innermost compartment, the matrix, only approx1% of mitochondrial proteins are encoded by the organellar genome and synthesized in the matrix.

The vast majority of mitochondrial proteins are encoded by nuclear genes and synthesized as precursor proteins on cytosolic ribosomes5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Two major pathways of protein transport into mitochondria have been characterized in detail: the presequence pathway for import of matrix proteins and the carrier pathway for import of hydrophobic inner membrane proteins (Fig. 1). Recent studies, however, led to the identification of a novel pathway that is dedicated to the sorting and assembly of mitochondrial outer-membrane proteins, in particular of a class of proteins anchored in the membrane by transmembrane beta-strands. This review summarizes the known mechanisms of mitochondrial protein import and then focuses on the discovery of the sorting and assembly machinery of the outer membrane (SAM complex) and its implications for protein assembly, mitochondrial evolution and morphology.

Figure 1. Protein import pathways into mitochondria.
Figure 1 thumbnail

Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and imported post-translationally. Cytosolic chaperones (not shown) guide the precursor proteins to the central mitochondrial entry gate, the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM complex). Then the precursor proteins follow different import pathways. Presequence-carrying proteins, such as most matrix proteins, are translocated by the presequence translocase of the inner membrane (TIM23 complex) in a membrane potential (Deltapsi)-dependent manner. The ATP-driven presequence translocase-associated motor (PAM) is required for the completion of protein translocation into the matrix, where the mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) removes the presequence. Noncleavable hydrophobic inner-membrane proteins, such as the carrier proteins, are guided by complexes of small Tim proteins across the intermembrane space (IMS) and are inserted into the inner membrane (IM) by the Deltapsi-driven carrier translocase (TIM22 complex). The precursors of beta-barrel proteins of the outer membrane (OM) are transferred from the TOM complex to the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM complex) with the help of small Tim proteins of the IMS.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (68K)
Two major pathways of mitochondrial protein import
Mitochondrial precursor proteins contain targeting signals that are recognized by receptors of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM complex) (Fig. 1). The classical targeting signal is at the N terminus. This presequence forms a positively charged amphipathic alpha-helix and is imported into the matrix5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Upon interaction with Tom receptors, the presequences direct the translocation of the preproteins through the import channel of the TOM complex to the presequence translocase of the inner mitochondrial membrane (TIM23 complex). The presequence translocase-associated motor (PAM) drives the completion of protein translocation into the matrix, where the mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) removes the presequences. Some proteins of the inner membrane are also synthesized with a presequence. Those precursor proteins use the presequence import pathway with the TOM complex and the TIM23 complex and are guided into the inner membrane by a hydrophobic sorting sequence that typically follows the positively charged presequence10, 11.

Many mitochondrial proteins, however, are synthesized without a cleavable extension but contain internal targeting signals. Major representatives of this second group of precursor proteins are hydrophobic inner-membrane proteins such as the large family of metabolite translocators (carrier proteins)5, 6, 8, 9. The carrier proteins are imported by a different mechanism than the cleavable presequence-carrying proteins12. Although the cleavable preproteins and the noncleavable carrier proteins are both imported by the TOM complex, the mode of translocation is different. Presequence proteins are translocated through the TOM complex as linear polypeptide chains, guided by the N-terminal presequence, whereas the carrier precursors traverse the TOM channel with a middle portion first (in a loop formation)13. After passing through the TOM complex, the import route of the carrier precursors diverges from the presequence route and uses a specific machinery of the intermembrane space and inner membrane (Fig. 1). A class of intermembrane-space proteins, termed small Tim proteins, bind the carrier precursors and protect the hydrophobic segments during transfer across the aqueous intermembrane space5, 6, 8, 9, 14. The small Tim proteins thus function in a chaperone-like manner and deliver the carrier precursors to the membrane-integrated carrier translocase of the inner membrane (TIM22 complex)15.

Identification of a new protein biogenesis pathway
The proteins of the mitochondrial inner membrane contain transmembrane alpha-helices like the proteins that are present in most other membranes of a eukaryotic cell, including the endoplasmic reticulum, the nuclear envelope, the Golgi and post-Golgi compartments of the secretory pathway and the plasma membrane. The mitochon-drial outer membrane represents an exception because it contains proteins that are anchored in the membrane by multiple beta-strands16, 17, 18. Little has been known about the import and membrane integration of those beta-barrel proteins.

All mitochondrial outer-membrane proteins are synthesized as noncleavable pre-cursor proteins on cytosolic ribosomes. Because the TOM complex functions as the central entry gate for virtually all nuclear-encoded mitochondrial precursor proteins, it had been assumed that this complex is also responsible for the sorting and assembly of outer-membrane proteins, including the precursors of the TOM complex itself19, 20, 21, 22. The TOM complex has a size of approx450 kDa and consists of seven different subunits23, 24 (Fig. 2). Tom20, Tom22 and Tom70 function as receptors for the various classes of mitochondrial pre-cursor proteins25, 26 (numbers refer to the approximate molecular mass of a component in kDa). The core of the TOM complex is made up of Tom40 that forms the protein-conducting channel across the outer membrane and thus is essential for cell viability27, 28. A small Tom protein, Tom5, supports the insertion of precursor proteins into the Tom40 channel29 while two other small Tom proteins, Tom6 and Tom7, influence the stability of the TOM complex30. Upon synthesis in the cytosol, the precursors of Tom proteins are recognized by the pre-existing TOM complex; that is, the mature TOM complex is required for importing its own precursor proteins19, 21, 30, 31, 32, 33.

Figure 2. The protein import and sorting machineries of the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Figure 2 thumbnail

All outer-membrane (OM) proteins are synthesized in the cytosol. Molecular chaperones bind to the precursor proteins and prevent their aggregation. The precursor proteins are recognized by the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM complex). The TOM complex consists of three receptors (Tom20, Tom22 and Tom70), the channel-forming protein Tom40 and three small Tom proteins (Tom5, Tom6 and Tom7). Simple OM proteins with single transmembrane segments can be directly imported into the OM with the help of the TOM complex. The precursors of OM proteins with a more complicated topology, such as beta-barrel proteins, are translocated through the TOM complex to the intermembrane space (IMS) side. Small Tim proteins guide the precursor proteins to the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM complex), where the insertion into the OM takes place. Sam50 forms the core of the SAM complex and cooperates with Sam35 and Sam37 in the integration of beta-barrel proteins such as porin and Tom40. However, the precursor of Tom40 additionally requires the function of Mdm10 that promotes the assembly of Tom40 with other Tom subunits to the mature TOM complex. IM, inner membrane.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (38K)
Recent studies, however, revealed that the TOM complex was not sufficient to integrate beta-barrel proteins into the outer membrane and was not able to assemble its own precursor proteins into functional complexes. The discovery of the new sorting and assembly pathway with the SAM complex occurred in two steps. The model substrate was the precursor of the beta-barrel protein Tom40. The precursor of Tom40 is initially recognized by the Tom receptors on the mitochondrial surface19, 30, 32. Unexpectedly, the Tom40 precursor is not directly integrated into the TOM complex but uses the pre-existing Tom40 channel for translocation to the trans side of the outer membrane—that is, to the intermembrane space30, 34 (Fig. 2). The Tom40 precursor then assembles via several intermediate steps into a mature TOM complex. This initial observation suggested the presence of a novel assembly pathway for outer-membrane proteins30.

The second step for the discovery of the SAM complex was made by the analysis of yeast mutant mitochondria that lacked individual outer-membrane proteins. Mitochondria lacking the protein Sam37 (formerly named Mas37 or Tom37) were strongly impaired in the assembly of Tom40, whereas the two known import pathways, the presequence pathway and the carrier pathway, were not affected34. Sam37 was identified about a decade ago. Yeast cells lacking Sam37 showed pleiotropic effects in phospholipid metabolism, protein import and a genetic interaction with Tom proteins35, leading to the name Tom37. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that the protein was not present in the TOM complex and did not act as an import receptor36, so its function was unclear. It is now established that Sam37 is the founding subunit of the SAM complex of the mitochondrial outer membrane34 (Fig. 2). Mitochondria lacking Sam37 are impaired in the assembly pathway not only of Tom40 but also of further beta-barrel proteins, including the most abundant outer-membrane protein, porin. Sam37 is present in a 200-kDa SAM core complex that is crucial for the membrane integration of mitochondrial beta-barrel proteins, whereas simple outer-membrane proteins that contain a single alpha-helical transmembrane segment can be inserted into the membrane with the aid of the TOM complex alone34. The crucial role of Sam37 for sorting and assembly of outer-membrane proteins explains the various pleiotropic effects that had been observed in mutant cells lacking Sam37.

The SAM complex is essential for cell viability
Two additional subunits of the SAM core complex have been found and each is essential for cell viability. The first, Sam50 (Tob55/Omp85) was identified by three different experimental strategies: purification of the SAM complex37, proteomic analysis of the mitochondrial outer membrane38 and sequence comparison of bacterial and mitochondrial proteins39. The second, Sam35 (Tob38) was identified by isolation of the SAM complex40, 41. Sam50 is an integral outer-membrane protein with a predicted beta-barrel domain, whereas Sam35 behaves as peripheral membrane protein that is exposed on the mitochondrial surface37, 38, 39, 40, 41 (Fig. 2). Conditional yeast mutants of Sam50 or Sam35 are defective in the assembly of beta-barrel outer-membrane proteins. Sam50 and Sam35 thus show the same substrate specificity as Sam37 (refs. 34,37, 38, 39, 40, 41). Sam50 is thought to represent the central subunit of the SAM complex. Purified Sam50 has been reported to form ring-shaped particles with a large channel38. Sam50 contains an N-terminal domain that is probably exposed to the intermembrane space and may represent the interaction site for beta-barrel precursors before their insertion into the SAM complex. The exact molecular functions of Sam35, Sam37 and Sam50 are still unknown but the genetic and biochemical experiments demonstrate that all three proteins have to cooperate for an efficient membrane integration of outer-membrane beta-barrel precursors34, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41.

Together with Tom40, three proteins of the mitochondrial outer membrane are now known that are strictly essential for cell viability. The presence of two essential proteins, Sam50 and Sam35, in the SAM complex emphasizes the central role of the new complex in mitochondrial biogenesis.

Protein transfer from TOM to SAM
How are the precursors of beta-barrel proteins transferred from the TOM complex to the SAM complex? A removal of intermembrane space proteins by opening of the outer membrane strongly impairs the transfer of beta-barrel precursors to the SAM complex, whereas simple outer-membrane proteins with an alpha-helical membrane anchor, like Tom20, are efficiently assembled42. Thus inter-membrane space components are probably involved in the transfer of beta-barrel precursors from TOM to SAM. Indeed, the complexes of small Tim proteins, which have been known for their role in transfer of inner-membrane precursors from the TOM complex to the TIM22 complex5, 8, 9, 14, also function in the biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins42, 43 (Fig. 2), explaining the previous observation that porin assembly depends on an intact intermembrane space44. Remarkably, each of the small Tim complexes, the essential Tim9−Tim10 complex and the non-essential Tim8−Tim13 complex, promote the transfer of beta-barrel precursors to the SAM complex. The chaperone-like functions of the small Tim proteins probably shield hydrophobic segments of the precursor proteins against aggregation in the aqueous intermembrane space and thus keep the beta-barrel precursors in a competent state for insertion into the outer membrane via the SAM complex.

A conserved pathway for protein assembly
The analysis of the primary structure of Sam50 revealed a striking similarity to the outer-membrane protein Omp85 of Gram-negative bacteria37, 38, 39. Sam50 contains a C-terminal beta-barrel domain of approx30 kDa that is conserved from bacteria to man. Actually, Sam50 is the first transport component of the mitochondrial outer membrane that exhibits substantial homology to a bacterial protein. Different functions have been reported for bacterial Omp85, participating in either the insertion of beta-barrel proteins into the bacterial outer membrane45 or the transport of lipids to the outer membrane46. In light of the role of Sam50 in mitochondrial protein insertion, it seems likely that bacterial Omp85 also functions in protein export (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Conservation of beta-barrel insertion into the outer membranes of mitochondria and Gram-negative bacteria.
Figure 3 thumbnail

Sam50 of the mitochondrial SAM complex contains a large membrane-embedded domain that is homologous to a domain of the protein Omp85 of the bacterial outer membrane (OM). Although the initial transport steps of OM beta-barrel proteins are different for mitochondria (via the TOM complex of the OM) and bacteria (via the Sec complex of the inner membrane (IM)), the proteins are inserted into the OM from the same direction (from the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) and the bacterial periplasm). Chaperone-like proteins guide the proteins through the aqueous IMS (small Tim proteins) and periplasm (Skp), respectively. Protein integration into the OM is then mediated by the conserved Sam50/Omp85. Omp85 may be part of a multisubunit complex47 (not shown) like the SAM complex; however, further subunits of this putative Omp85 complex have not been identified so far.



Full FigureFull Figure and legend (58K)
Because mitochondrial beta-barrel precursors are exposed to the intermembrane space before being inserted into the SAM complex, the direction of insertion has also been conserved from bacteria to eukaryotic cells. In mitochondria and bacteria, the hydrophobic beta-barrel precursors are transferred through an aqueous space, the intermembrane space or the periplasm, respectively. In both cases, chaperone-like molecules have been found that are critical for the transfer of the precursor proteins, the small Tim proteins of mitochondria, the chaperone Skp of bacteria and possibly additional chaperones42, 43, 47, 48, 49 (Fig. 3). Though the small Tim proteins and Skp are not homologous to each other, the principle of chaperone-assisted transfer of precursors to Sam50/Omp85 has been conserved.

Interestingly, bacterial Omp85 is also homologous to the channel-forming protein Toc75 of chloroplasts39, 47, 50. There are four genes in Arabidopsis thaliana that could encode forms of Toc75. Toc75-III is the central component of the TOC protein import complex of the chloroplast outer envelope and thus transports precursor proteins in the opposite direction than Sam50/Omp85 (ref. 50). However, chloroplasts contain a further isoform, Toc75-V, which is more closely related in sequence to the outer-membrane protein SynToc75 of the chloroplastic ancestors cyanobacteria, to bacterial Omp85 and to mitochondrial Sam50 (refs. 39,51). Toc75-V is not present in the isolated TOC import complex of chloroplasts. It may thus represent the equivalent of Sam50 in a putative protein sorting and assembly machinery of the chloroplast outer envelope.

Connecting protein assembly and mitochondrial morphology
The SAM complex revealed an unexpected connection between two fields that had thus far been regarded as different areas: protein assembly and mitochondrial morphology. Upon purification of the SAM complex, the beta-barrel protein Mdm10 was found as the fourth subunit52. The 56-kDa protein Mdm10 had been previously identified by its role in maintaining mitochondrial distribution and morphology53. Mdm10 associates with the 200-kDa SAM core complex to form a larger complex of 350 kDa (ref. 52).

Whereas the three subunits of the SAM core complex, Sam35, Sam37 and Sam50, are generally required for the biogenesis of beta-barrel proteins of the outer membrane, Mdm10 plays a specific role in the assembly of the TOM complex (Fig. 2). Mdm10 is required for the late stages of Tom40 assembly. After insertion of the Tom40 precursor into the outer membrane by the SAM core complex, the precursor stably associates with the small protein Tom5. Then the other Tom subunits, in particular Tom6, Tom7 and the central receptor Tom22, bind to Tom40 in a sequential manner that depends on the presence of Mdm10 (ref. 52). Mdm10 seems to function as a scaffold where the late steps of assembly of the multisubunit TOM complex take place. Because Tom22 and at least some of the small Tom proteins do not form beta-barrel structures but contain alpha-helical transmembrane segments16, 24, Mdm10 broadens the substrate spectrum of the large SAM complex so that the beta-barrel protein Tom40 can interact with alpha-helical proteins52.

Yeast cells lacking Mdm10 show defects in both assembly of the TOM complex and mitochondrial morphology52, 53. This raises the question of whether the primary function of Mdm10 is protein assembly or maintenance of mitochondrial morphology. Whereas the mitochondria of wild-type yeast cells form a tubular network, cells lacking Mdm10 contain large, spherical mitochondria53. Yeast mutants of the TOM complex or of subunits of the SAM core complex have similar aberrant mitochondrial shapes; in other words, the morphology defects are not specific for Mdm10 alone but are found with various mutant mitochondria that are defective in assembly of the TOM complex. Thus, the alteration of mitochondrial shape is probably a secondary effect of the loss of Mdm10 because defects in TOM assembly will lead to impaired import of many outer-membrane proteins, including proteins directly required for maintaining mitochondrial morphology. It is also conceivable that Mdm10 plays a dual role—that is, functions in the protein assembly machinery52 and in the machinery controlling mitochondrial distribution and morphology54.

Conclusions and perspectives
The identification and characterization of the SAM pathway led to several surprising twists in the analysis of organelle biogenesis. Pleiotropic effects and seemingly unrelated functions of mitochondrial proteins such as Sam37 and Mdm10 can now be explained by a central role in membrane protein assembly. The conservation of Sam50 from bacteria to man provides important insight into the evolution of the mitochondrial outer membrane and the development of its protein biogenesis system. A protein transport system of the Sam50/Omp85-type was already present in the mitochondrial ancestor while the TOM complex was developed in the eukaryotic cell. The Sam50 system may thus have carried out general functions in protein import and export in the beginning of mitochondrial development. Chloroplasts contain two Omp85-type proteins, the protein import channel Toc75-III and the more bacterial-like isoform Toc75-V50, 51. It will be interesting to see whether Toc75-V is required for the integration of beta-barrel proteins into the chloroplast outer envelope.

The identification of a novel protein-sorting pathway raises important questions that will be the subject of future research. The driving forces for protein translocation and insertion at the outer membrane are largely unknown. The ATP-dependence of the import of porin is probably due to the release of the precursor from cytosolic chaperones55 whereas the energetics of translocation via TOM complex and SAM complex have not been addressed so far. Different models are possible to explain how the SAM complex promotes the membrane integration of beta-barrel proteins. A channel formed by Sam50 may mediate the insertion of precursor proteins and then release them laterally into the lipid phase of the membrane. However, Sam50 is a beta-barrel protein itself and the lateral opening of a channel formed by beta-strands would be energetically unfavorable because several hydrogen bonds must be broken, whereas the lateral release of alpha-helices by alpha-helical translocases (such as in the mitochondrial inner membrane or the endoplasmic reticulum) mainly depends on the dissociation of van der Waals interactions17, 18. It is conceivable that other subunits of the SAM complex like Sam35 and Sam37 are crucial in regulating the function and opening of Sam50 in an energy-dependent manner. Alternatively, the SAM complex may function in a scaffold-like manner to facilitate the insertion of proteins at the protein-lipid interface39. Sam50 may serve additional functions and, for example, participate in formation of the still elusive mitochondrial channel that is responsible for release of intermembrane-space proteins during apoptosis4, 9, 38. Interestingly, Sam37 and Sam35 of yeast mitochondria are related to the mammalian mitochondrial outer-membrane proteins metaxin 1 and metaxin 2, respectively40, 56. The two metaxins have sequence similarity and interact with each other56. Metaxin 1 was reported to be required for tumor necrosis factor−induced cell death57, leading to the speculation that the SAM complex may be involved in apoptosis40, 58.

What is the folding state of the precursor proteins during TOM translocation and transfer through the intermembrane space? Possibly part of the beta-barrel domain is already preformed21, 32 and the precursor polypeptide chain is inserted into the outer membrane in a block-wise manner. The available evidence indicates that the precursor proteins are still associated with the outer membrane when they are transferred from TOM to SAM. It is unclear whether further intermembrane space factors, chaperones or outer-membrane components are necessary for transfer from TOM to SAM, and which role is played by the Sam50 domain that is located in the intermembrane space.

The surprising connection between protein assembly and mitochondrial morphology raises the possibility that the presence of Mdm10 in a mitochondrial assembly machinery is just the tip of an iceberg. Genetic and cell biological screens have revealed a large number of proteins that are directly or indirectly involved in the maintenance of mitochondrial morphology59, 60. We speculate that other so-called morphology components may also play a role in the assembly of mitochondrial protein complexes.

Received 12 July 2004; Accepted 22 September 2004; Published online: 2 November 2004.

 Top
REFERENCES
  1. Sickmann, A. et al. The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13207–13212 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  2. Taylor, S.W. et al. Characterization of the human heart mitochondrial proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 281–286 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Lill, R. & Kispal, G. Maturation of cellular Fe-S proteins: an essential function of mitochondria. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 352–356 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  4. Newmeyer, D.D. & Ferguson-Miller, S. Mitochondria: releasing power for life and unleashing the machineries of death. Cell 112, 481–490 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Herrmann, J.M. & Neupert, W. Protein transport into mitochondria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 210–214 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Jensen, R.E. & Dunn, C.D. Protein import into and across the mitochondrial inner membrane: role of the TIM23 and TIM22 translocons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1592, 25–34 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  7. Endo, T., Yamamoto, H. & Esaki, M. Functional cooperation and separation of translocators in protein import into mitochondria, the double-membrane bounded organelles. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3259–3267 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Koehler, C.M. New developments in mitochondrial assembly. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 309–335 (2004). | PubMed |
  9. Wiedemann, N., Frazier, A.E. & Pfanner, N. The protein import machinery of mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 14473–14476 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Glick, B.S. et al. Cytochromes c1 and b2 are sorted to the intermembrane space of yeast mitochondria by a stop-transfer mechanism. Cell 69, 809–822 (1992). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Stuart, R.A. Insertion of proteins into the inner membrane of mitochondria: the role of the Oxa1 complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1592, 79–87 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Pfanner, N., Tropschug, M. & Neupert, W. Mitochondrial protein import: nucleoside triphosphates are involved in conferring import-competence to precursors. Cell 49, 815–823 (1987). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Wiedemann, N., Pfanner, N. & Ryan, M.T. The three modules of ADP/ATP carrier cooperate in receptor recruitment and translocation into mitochondria. EMBO J. 20, 951–960 (2001). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Vial, S. et al. Assembly of Tim9 and Tim10 into a functional chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 36100–36108 (2002). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  15. Rehling, P. et al. Protein insertion into the mitochondrial inner membrane by a twin-pore translocase. Science 299, 1747–1751 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Gabriel, K., Buchanan, S.K. & Lithgow, T. The alpha and the beta: protein translocation across mitochondrial and plastid outer membranes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 36–40 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  17. Matouschek, A. & Glick, B.S. Barreling through the outer membrane. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 284–286 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Johnson, A.E. & Jensen, R.E. Barreling through the membrane. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 113–114 (2004). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  19. Keil, P. et al. Biogenesis of the mitochondrial receptor complex: two receptors are required for binding of MOM38 to the outer membrane surface. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19177–19180 (1993). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  20. Krimmer, T. et al. Biogenesis of porin of the outer mitochondrial membrane involves an import pathway via receptors and the general import pore of the TOM complex. J. Cell Biol. 152, 289–300 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Rapaport, D. et al. Structural requirements of Tom40 for assembly into preexisting TOM complexes of mitochondria. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1189–1198 (2001). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Rapaport, D. Biogenesis of the mitochondrial TOM complex. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 191–197 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Künkele, K.-P. et al. The preprotein translocation channel of the outer membrane of mitochondria. Cell 93, 1009–1019 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. van Wilpe, S. et al. Tom22 is a multifunctional organizer of the mitochondrial pre-protein translocase. Nature 401, 485–489 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Brix, J., Rüdiger, S., Bukau, B., Schneider-Mergener, J. & Pfanner, N. Distribution of binding sequences for the mitochondrial import receptors Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 in a presequence-carrying preprotein and a non-cleavable preprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16522–16530 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  26. Abe, Y. et al. Structural basis of presequence recognition by the mitochondrial protein import receptor Tom20. Cell 100, 551–560 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Hill, K. et al. Tom40 forms the hydrophilic channel of the mitochondrial import pore for preproteins. Nature 395, 516–521 (1998). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  28. Baker, K.P., Schaniel, A., Vestweber, D. & Schatz, G. A yeast mitochondrial outer membrane protein essential for protein import and cell viability. Nature 348, 605–609 (1990). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  29. Dietmeier, K. et al. Tom5 functionally links mitochondrial preprotein receptors to the general import pore. Nature 388, 195–200 (1997). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Model, K. et al. Multistep assembly of the protein import channel of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 361–370 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  31. Schneider, H. et al. Targeting of the master receptor MOM19 to mitochondria. Science 254, 1659–1662 (1991). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  32. Rapaport, D. & Neupert, W. Biogenesis of Tom40, core component of the TOM complex of mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 146, 321–331 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  33. Taylor, R.D., McHale, B.J. & Nargang, F.E. Characterization of Neurospora crassa Tom40-deficient mutants and effect of specific mutations on Tom40 assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 765–775 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  34. Wiedemann, N. et al. Machinery for protein sorting and assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Nature 424, 565–571 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  35. Gratzer, S. et al. Mas37p, a novel receptor subunit for protein import into mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 129, 25–34 (1995). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Ryan, M.T., Müller, H. & Pfanner, N. Functional staging of ADP/ATP carrier trans-location across the outer mitochondrial membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20619–20627 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  37. Kozjak, V. et al. An essential role of Sam50 in the protein sorting and assembly machinery of the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48520–48523 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  38. Paschen, S.A. et al. Evolutionary conservation of biogenesis of beta-barrel membrane proteins. Nature 426, 862–866 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  39. Gentle, I., Gabriel, K., Beech, P., Waller, R. & Lithgow, T. The Omp85 family of proteins is essential for outer membrane biogenesis in mitochondria and bacteria. J. Cell Biol. 164, 19–24 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  40. Milenkovic, D. et al. Sam35 of the mitochondrial protein sorting and assembly machinery is a peripheral outer membrane protein essential for cell viability. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 22781–22785 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  41. Waizenegger, T. et al. Tob38, a novel essential component in the biogenesis of beta-barrel proteins of mitochondria. EMBO Rep. 5, 704–709 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  42. Wiedemann, N et al. Biogenesis of the protein import channel Tom40 of the mitochondrial outer membrane: intermembrane space components are involved in an early stage of the assembly pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18188–18194 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  43. Hoppins, S.C. & Nargang, F.E. The Tim8–Tim13 complex of Neurospora crassa functions in the assembly of proteins into both mitochondrial membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 12396–12405 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  44. Smith, M., Hicks, S., Baker, K. & McCauley, R. Rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane impairs porin assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28460–28464 (1994). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  45. Voulhoux, R., Bos, M.P., Geurtsen, J., Mols, M. & Tommassen, J. Role of a highly conserved bacterial protein in outer membrane protein assembly. Science 299, 262–265 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  46. Genevrois, S., Steeghs, L., Roholl, P., Letesson, J.J. & van der Ley, P. The Omp85 protein of Neisseria meningitidis is required for lipid export to the outer membrane. EMBO J. 22, 1780–1789 (2003). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  47. Voulhoux, R. & Tommassen, J. Omp85, an evolutionarily conserved bacterial protein involved in outer-membrane-protein assembly. Res. Microbiol. 155, 129–135 (2004). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  48. Schäfer, U., Beck, K. & Müller, M. Skp, a molecular chaperone of Gram-negative bacteria, is required for the formation of soluble periplasmic intermediates of outer membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24567–24574 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  49. Harms, N. et al. The early interaction of the outer membrane protein PhoE with the periplasmic chaperone Skp occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18804–18811 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  50. Soll, J. & Schleiff, E. Protein import into chloroplasts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 198–208 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  51. Eckart, K. et al. A Toc75-like protein import channel is abundant in chloroplasts. EMBO Rep. 3, 557–562 (2002). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  52. Meisinger, C. et al. The mitochondrial morphology protein Mdm10 functions in assembly of the preprotein translocase of the outer membrane. Dev. Cell 7, 61–71 (2004). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  53. Sogo, L.F. & Yaffe, M.P. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology and inheritance by Mdm10p, a protein of the mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1361–1373 (1994). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  54. Boldogh, I.R. et al. A protein complex containing Mdm10p, Mdm12p, and Mmm1p links mitochondrial membranes and DNA to the cytoskeleton-based segregation machinery. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4618–4627 (2003). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  55. Pfanner, N. et al. Role of ATP in mitochondrial protein import: conformational alteration of a precursor protein can substitute for ATP requirement. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 4049–4051 (1988). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  56. Armstrong, L.C., Saenz, A.J. & Bornstein, P. Metaxin 1 interacts with metaxin 2, a novel related protein associated with the mammalian mitochondrial outer membrane. J. Cell. Biochem. 74, 11–22 (1999). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  57. Wang, X. et al. Metaxin is required for tumor necrosis factor-induced cell death. EMBO Rep. 2, 628–633 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  58. Ryan, M.T. Chaperones: inserting beta-barrels into membranes. Curr. Biol. 14, R207–R209 (2004). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  59. Shaw, J.M. & Nunnari, J. Mitochondrial dynamics and division in budding yeast. Trends Cell Biol. 12, 178–184 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  60. Dimmer, K.S. et al. Genetic basis of mitochondrial function and morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 847–853 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
 Top
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to G. Schatz, F. Paltauf, S.D. Kohlwein, J. Soll, R.E. Jensen, K.Mihara, I. Gentle and M.T. Ryan for discussion and support in clarifying the nomenclature of the SAM subunits according to the rules of the Saccharomyces genome database (SGD). Work of the authors' laboratories was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Sonderforschungsbereich 388, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Programme, Max Planck Research Award, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and the Australian Research Council.

Competing interests statement:  The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

FULL TEXT
Previous | Next
Table of contents
Download PDFDownload PDF
Send to a friendSend to a friend
More articles like this

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Abstract
Figures & Tables
Acknowledgments
References
Export citation
Export references
natureproducts

Search buyers guide:

 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
ISSN: 1545-9993
EISSN: 1545-9985
Journal home | Advance online publication | Current issue | Archive | Press releases | Supplements | For authors | Online submission | Permissions | For referees | Free online issue | About the journal | Contact the journal | Subscribe | Advertising | work@npg | naturereprints | About this site | For librarians
Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works©2004 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy