Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Should elective partial nephrectomy be performed for renal cell carcinoma >4 cm in size?

Abstract

This Practice Point discusses the study of Pahernik and colleagues, which compared outcomes of partial nephrectomy between 102 patients with renal cell carcinoma >4 cm in size and 372 patients with tumors ≤4 cm in size. No significant differences were seen between the two groups in local-recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival at 10 years. This study adds to the growing literature base supporting partial nephrectomy for small renal masses whenever possible. The rationale for further expanding the indications for partial nephrectomy includes the presence of indolent or benign tumor histology in 45% of patients, concerns that radical nephrectomy can cause or worsen pre-existing chronic kidney disease, and the possibility of metachronous contralateral tumor recurrence in a solitary kidney after radical nephrectomy. Although technically more demanding than radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy provides equivalent oncological control while preserving renal function and preventing chronic kidney disease, and should be utilized whenever possible for the treatment of small renal masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lee CT et al. (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors of 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163: 730–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dash A et al. (2006) Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4–7 cm. BJU Int 97: 939–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pahernik S et al. (2008) Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 179: 71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yossepowitch O et al. (2008) Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 179: 2158–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang WC et al. (2006) Chronic kidney disease following nephrectomy for small renal cortical tumors. Lancet Oncol 7: 735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Go AS et al. (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351: 1296–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson HR et al. (2008) Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared to partial nephrectomy. J Urol 179: 468–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller DC et al. (2006) Partial nephrectomy for small renal masses: an emerging quality of care concern? J Urol 175: 853–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, P. Should elective partial nephrectomy be performed for renal cell carcinoma >4 cm in size?. Nat Rev Urol 5, 482–483 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1177

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1177

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing