Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Does slower delivery of shock-wave lithotripsy improve treatment efficacy for urolithiasis?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Eisenmenger W (2001) The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in ESWL. Ultrasound Med Biol 27: 683–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman AJ et al. (1987) Acoustic cavitation generated by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter. Ultrasound Med Biol 13: 69–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loske AM et al. (2002) Tandem shock wave cavitation enhancement for extracorporeal lithotripsy. Phys Med Biol 47: 3945–3957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huber P et al. (1999) Control of cavitation activity by different shockwave pulsing regimes. Phys Med Biol 44: 1427–1437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiksell H and Kinn AC (1995) Implications of cavitation phenomena for shot intervals in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Br J Urol 75: 720–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Sandra Michelmore, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A Tolley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajan, P., Tolley, D. Does slower delivery of shock-wave lithotripsy improve treatment efficacy for urolithiasis?. Nat Rev Urol 2, 132–133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0118

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing