Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Could lead-time bias explain the apparent benefits of early salvage radiotherapy?

Early use of salvage radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy has consistently been shown to provide better oncological outcomes than late use. However, the corresponding scientific literature might be subject to lead-time bias, given that in virtually all the available comparative studies, investigators calculated the survival period of included patients from the time of salvage radiotherapy — instead of from the time of radical prostatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A hypothetical disease course of a patient with prostate cancer.

References

  1. Simmons, M. N., Stephenson, A. J. & Klein, E. A. Natural history of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: risk assessment for secondary therapy. Eur. Urol. 51, 1175–1184 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, I. M. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J. Urol. 181, 956–962 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolla, M. et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 380, 2018–2027 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiegel, T. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 trial. Eur. Urol. 66, 243–250 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tendulkar, R. D. et al. Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3648–3654 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stish, B. J. et al. Improved metastasis-free and survival outcomes with early salvage radiotherapy in men with detectable prostate-specific antigen after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 3864–3871 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasco, A. Lead time and length bias in case-control studies for the evaluation of screening. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 41, 103–104 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Briganti, A. et al. Early salvage radiation therapy does not compromise cancer control in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: results of a match-controlled multi-institutional analysis. Eur. Urol. 62, 472–487 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fossati, N. et al. Long-term impact of adjuvant versus early salvage radiation therapy in pT3N0 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional series. Eur. Urol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.028 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Quoc-Dien Trinh is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from the Vattikuti Urology Institute, a Clay Hamlin Young Investigator Award from the Prostate Cancer Foundation and a Genentech BioOncology Career Development Award from the Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firas Abdollah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

F.A. has acted as a consultant of GenomeDx Biosciences, this work does not directly relate to the submitted work. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Related links

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seisen, T., Trinh, QD. & Abdollah, F. Could lead-time bias explain the apparent benefits of early salvage radiotherapy?. Nat Rev Urol 14, 193–194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.14

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.14

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing