Perspectives
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4, 926-929 (November 2003) | doi:10.1038/nrn1259
Opinion: LTP: perils and progress
John Lisman1, Jeff W. Lichtman2 & Joshua R. Sanes2 About the authors
Abstract
On the thirtieth birthday of long-term potentiation (LTP), it is appropriate to step back from the fray, evaluate what has been learned and look to the future. Two of us (J.W.L. and J.R.S.) published such an evaluation a few years ago in the hope that the ignorance conferred to us by our status as outsiders to the field might be offset, at least in part, by a freshness of perspective. The responses to that article have been numerous and fascinating, with experts and non-experts raising points in private that would benefit from open discussion. Here, joined by an LTP 'insider' (J.L.), we initiate such a discussion, restating, clarifying and debating some of the points that were raised in the original article.
Author affiliations
- John Lisman is at the Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, 02454, USA.
- Jeff W. Lichtman and Joshua R. Sanes are at the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8108 St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093, USA.
Correspondence to: John Lisman1 Email: lisman@brandeis.edu
|
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated REFERENCE NEWS AND VIEWS RESEARCH |

