Correspondence
The editors are pleased to receive correspondence regarding reviews or perspectives published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Our criterion for the publication of such correspondence is that it should benefit readers by extending the arguments of the original article(s).
For details about submitting correspondence, please go to: http://www.nature.com/reviews/guide/index.html
2005
November 2005 Vol 6 No 11
DEATH, UNCONSCIOUSNESS AND THE BRAIN
Steven Laureys
p899 | doi:10.1038/nrn1789
Comment: Confusion about brain death
Joffe, A. R.
21 June 2006, Published online only
March 2005 Vol 6 No 3
IMAGING IMPLICIT PERCEPTION: PROMISE AND PITFALLS
Deborah E. Hannula, Daniel J. Simons and Neal J. Cohen
p247 | doi:10.1038/nrn1630
Comment: Remain aware of awareness
Stefan Wiens
January 2006, Published online only
Response: Objective measures of awareness: why not aim higher?
Deborah E. Hannula, Daniel J. Simons and Neal J. Cohen
January 2006, Published online only
2004
June 2004 Vol 5 No 6
NEUROBIOLOGY OF INTELLIGENCE: SCIENCE AND ETHICS
Jeremy R. Gray & Paul M. Thompson
p471 | doi:10.1038/nrn1405
Comment: A politically correct effort to obstruct research on the genetics of ethnoracial differences in g
Frye, R. A.
1 November 2005, Published online only
Response: Recognizing the need for ethical safeguards in race-based studies
Jeremy R. Gray & Paul M. Thompson
1 November 2005, Published online only
April 2004 Vol 5 No 4
SPECIFIC LONG-TERM MEMORY TRACES IN PRIMARY AUDITORY CORTEX
Norman M. Weinberger
p279 | doi:10.1038/nrn1366
Comment: Fallacies in behavioural interpretation of auditory cortex plasticity
Ohl, F W and Scheich, H
20 November 2004, Published online only
Response: Correcting misconceptions of tuning shifts in auditory cortex
Weinberger, N M
20 November 2004, Published online only
Comment: Criticisms of 'Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex'
Suga, N, Ji, W and Ma, X
20 November 2004, Published online only
Response: Consequences of failures to meet standards in learning and memory
Weinberger, N M
20 November 2004, Published online only
2002
July 2002 Vol 3 No 7
ANIMAL MODELS OF NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS: HOW RELEVANT IS THE RAT?
M. Angela Cenci, Ian Q. Whishaw & Timothy Schallert
p574 | doi:10.1038/nrn877
Comment: Is the rat a good model for human neurological disease?
Lemon, R & Griffiths, J
4 March 2003, Published online only
Response: Models for human neurological disease: both rats and primates are needed
Cenci, M A, Whishaw, I Q and Schallert, T
4 March 2003, Published online only
February 2002 Vol 3 No 2
WHAT DOES FMRI TELL US ABOUT NEURONAL ACTIVITY?
M. Angela Cenci, Ian Q. Whishaw & Timothy Schallert
p142 | doi:10.1038/nrn730
Comment: Metabolism of neurons and glia
Gjedde, A
29 November 2002, Published online only
2001
September 2001 Vol 2 No 9
MOLECULAR GENETICS OF CRANIAL NERVE DEVELOPMENT IN MOUSE
Sabine P. Cordes
p611 | doi:10.1038/35090039
Comment: The brainstem of mice, men and other mammals
Nieuwenhuys, R
13 January 2003, Published online only
August 2001 Vol 2 No 8
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF LEVODOPA-INDUCED DYSKINESIA: POTENTIAL FOR NEW THERAPIES
Erwan Bezard, Jonathan M. Brotchie, & Christian E. Gross
p611 | doi:10.1038/35086062
Comment: Animal models of movement disorders: species versus investigator-dependent limitations
Cenci, M. A., Schallert, T. and Keefe, K. A.
29 January 2002, Published online only
