TABLE 2 | Recommended reference test for the evaluation of an RDT for detection of active VL disease

From the following article:

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests: visceral leishmaniasis

Marleen Boelaert, Sujit Bhattacharya, François Chappuis, Sayda H. El Safi, Asrat Hailu, Dinesh Mondal, Suman Rijal, Shyam Sundar, Monique Wasunna & Rosanna W. Peeling

Nature Reviews Microbiology 5, S30-S39 (November 2007)

doi:10.1038/nrmicro1766

Reference standardSpecimen(s)Problems
Direct smears and culture of tissue aspirate, including splenic aspirateSplenic aspirate, or lymph node or bone marrow aspiratesSplenic aspirates can only be carried out under controlled conditions (risk 0.1%)
  Will yield only minor misclassification bias, which should be adjusted for
If splenic aspirates cannot be obtained, use latent class analysis, based on one or more of the following: other parasitology; validated serology (rK39, or DAT); response to treatment (if other markers available); specific clinical signs (pancytopenia, darkened skin)Lymph node or bone marrow buffy coat; serum or capillary bloodLatent class analysis requires good prior knowledge of the markers included in the model or the inclusion of a sufficient number of markers for identifiability; response to narrow-spectrum drug and no drug resistance/ requires standardization of assessment
If splenic aspirates cannot be obtained, use a composite reference standard based on one or more of the following: other parasitology; validated serology (rK39 or DAT); response to treatment (if other markers available) Lymph node or bone marrow buffy coat; serum or capillary bloodA composite reference standard requires good prior knowledge of the markers included and adjustment for the amount of misclassification bias; response to narrow-spectrum drug and no drug resistance/ requires standardization of assessment
DAT, direct agglutination test; VL, visceral leishmaniasis.

Download file

If the slide opens in your browser, select "File > Save As" to save it.