Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 11 Issue 3, March 2010

From The Editors

Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

  • New insight into how Bub1 and BUBR1 prevent chromosomal instability.

    • Katharine H. Wrighton
    Research Highlight
  • The COG complex directly participates in double-membrane vesicle formation.

    • Debbie Walker
    Research Highlight
  • Ribosomal DNA repeats are essential for maintaining genome integrity.

    • Rachel David
    Research Highlight
Top of page ⤴

In Brief

Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

  • The SUMO E1 active site is remodelled for thioester bond formation.

    • Maria Hodges
    Research Highlight
  • Nucleoporins activate developmental and cell cycle genes inD. melanogaster.

    • Kim Baumann
    Research Highlight
Top of page ⤴

Journal Club

Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

  • Integrin–Gα13interaction mediates signalling to SRC and RHOA.

    • Kim Baumann
    Research Highlight
Top of page ⤴

Progress

  • Several human neurological and neuromuscular diseases are caused by the expansion of repetitive DNA tracts. Understanding the DNA metabolic processes responsible for the expansion (or lengthening) and contraction (or shortening) of DNA repeats might open new therapeutic avenues for the treatment of these diseases.

    • Arturo López Castel
    • John D. Cleary
    • Christopher E. Pearson
    Progress
Top of page ⤴

Review Article

  • An unstable genome is a hallmark of many cancer cells. Telomeres prevent the ends of linear chromosomes from being recognized as damaged DNA, thus protecting them from DNA repair mechanisms and inhibiting the breakage–fusion–bridge cycles that cause genome instability.

    • Roderick J. O'Sullivan
    • Jan Karlseder
    Review Article
  • Genomic architecture can be markedly affected during meiosis by non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), which generates chromosomal rearrangements that can lead to genome instability. Studies in yeast have provided insights into the mechanisms of NAHR and the strategies used to restrain it.

    • Mariko Sasaki
    • Julian Lange
    • Scott Keeney
    Review Article
  • Homologous recombination maintains genome stability in mammalian mitotic cells through precise repair of DNA double-strand breaks and other lesions that occur during normal cellular metabolism and through exogenous insults. Deficiencies in genes that encode proteins involved in homologous recombination are associated with developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis.

    • Mary Ellen Moynahan
    • Maria Jasin
    Review Article
  • During DNA replication, secondary structures, highly transcribed DNA sequences and damaged DNA stall replication forks, which then require checkpoint factors and specialized enzymes for their stabilization and subsequent advance. The mechanisms promoting replication fork integrity and genome stability in eukaryotic cells are becoming clear.

    • Dana Branzei
    • Marco Foiani
    Review Article
  • Genomic instability in hereditary cancers results from mutations in DNA repair genes, as predicted by the mutator hypothesis. However, high-throughput sequencing studies show that mutations in DNA repair genes are infrequent in non-hereditary cancers, leaving open the possibility that genomic instability in these cancers may be related to oncogene-induced DNA damage.

    • Simona Negrini
    • Vassilis G. Gorgoulis
    • Thanos D. Halazonetis
    Review Article
Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links