Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Imaging in clinical decision-making for portal vein thrombosis

Key Points

  • Doppler ultrasonography is the first imaging technique to be used for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) diagnosis; it is well-tolerated, accurate and a negative examination performed by a trained operator is sufficient to rule out thrombosis

  • Following PVT diagnosis, imaging techniques should guide clinicians about the presence or absence of prothrombotic conditions such as cirrhosis, solid tumours and septic foci, and signs suggestive of malignant thrombosis

  • CT or MRI is needed to assess the number of vessels involved in thrombosis, the severity of thrombotic stenoses and to map collateral circulation, all of which have prognostic importance

  • Imaging should determine signs of chronicity to determine the age of the thrombus; existence of a portal vein remnant should also be investigated

  • Magnetic resonance cholangiography is the technique of choice to assess portal cholangiopathy in patients with PVT; grade 3 portal cholangiopathy is associated with an increased risk of biliary complications

  • Imaging should be repeated 3–6 months after the first diagnosis and every 6 months thereafter, to inform about thrombosis improvement, stability and progression; symptoms suggesting re-thrombosis should be reassessed by CT or MRI

Abstract

Thrombosis of the portal venous system is a frequent and potentially life-threatening condition that can take place in a number of different clinical settings including liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, other solid tumours, abdominal septic foci, acute pancreatitis, haematological malignancies and congenital or acquired prothrombotic disorders. Clinical decision-making in patients with thrombosis of the portal venous system is a particularly complex process owing to the heterogeneity of the population affected by this condition and the lack of high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials for the use of anticoagulation therapy in these patients. This Review discusses the available data regarding how imaging can provide assistance to physicians involved in this decision-making process in different clinical settings. A flowchart illustrating how to use imaging in this setting, based on current evidence and on the experience of the Vascular Liver Diseases Group of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis and its nature.
Figure 2: Extent of thrombosis, age of the thrombus and mapping of collaterals.
Figure 3: Portal cholangiopathy and follow-up of PVT.
Figure 4: Flowchart summarizing how the different imaging methods are used for diagnosing and follow-up of patients with PVT according to the consensus of the Vascular Liver Diseases Group at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bruce C. V. Campbell, Deidre A. De Silva, … Geoffrey A. Donnan

References

  1. Yerdel, M. A. et al. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome. Transplantation 69, 1873–1881 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajani, R. et al. The epidemiology and clinical features of portal vein thrombosis: a multicentre study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 32, 1154–1162 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Hernandez-Guerra, M. & Bosch, J. Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 28, 282–292 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Plessier, A. et al. Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: a prospective multicenter follow-up study. Hepatology 51, 210–218 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valla, D. et al. Etiology of portal vein thrombosis in adults. A prospective evaluation of primary myeloproliferative disorders. Gastroenterology 94, 1063–1069 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Denninger, M. H. et al. Cause of portal or hepatic venous thrombosis in adults: the role of multiple concurrent factors. Hepatology 31, 587–591 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Primignani, M. et al. Risk factors for thrombophilia in extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Hepatology 41, 603–608 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Turnes, J. et al. Portal hypertension-related complications after acute portal vein thrombosis: impact of early anticoagulation. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 6, 1412–1417 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nonami, T., Yokoyama, I., Iwatsuki, S. & Starzl, T. E. The incidence of portal vein thrombosis at liver transplantation. Hepatology 16, 1195–1198 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tripodi, A., Anstee, Q. M., Sogaard, K. K., Primignani, M. & Valla, D. C. Hypercoagulability in cirrhosis: causes and consequences. J. Thromb. Haemost. 9, 1713–1723 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tripodi, A. & Mannucci, P. M. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 147–156 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amitrano, L. et al. Risk factors and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 40, 736–741 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Francoz, C. et al. Splanchnic vein thrombosis in candidates for liver transplantation: usefulness of screening and anticoagulation. Gut 54, 691–697 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Englesbe, M. J. et al. Portal vein thrombosis and survival in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 16, 83–90 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 56, 908–943 (2012).

  16. Delgado, M. G. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 776–783 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tessler, F. N. et al. Diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis: value of color Doppler imaging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 157, 293–296 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bach, A. M. et al. Portal vein evaluation with US: comparison to angiography combined with CT arterial portography. Radiology 201, 149–154 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chawla, Y. & Kumar, S. Portal venous flow in Budd-Chiari syndrome [letter]. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 17, 37 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gertsch, P., Matthews, J., Lerut, J., Luder, P. & Blumgart, L. H. Acute thrombosis of the splanchnic veins. Arch. Surg. 128, 341–345 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berzigotti, A., Zoli, M., Bru, C. & Gilabert, R. in Portal Hypertension V: Proceedings of the Fifth Baveno International Consensus Workshop (ed. de Franchis, R.) 28–36 (Wiley Blackwell, 2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Berzigotti, A. & Piscaglia, F. Ultrasound in portal hypertension—part 2—and EFSUMB recommendations for the performance and reporting of ultrasound examinations in portal hypertension. Ultraschall. Med. 33, 8–32 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grant, E. G., Tessler, F. N. & Perrella, R. R. Clinical Doppler imaging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 152, 707–717 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Claudon, M. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver—update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall. Med. 34, 11–29 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi, S. et al. Contrast-enhanced versus conventional and color Doppler sonography for the detection of thrombosis of the portal and hepatic venous systems. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 186, 763–773 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabba, C. et al. Interobserver and interequipment variability of echo-Doppler examination of the portal vein: effect of a cooperative training program. Hepatology 21, 428–433 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuszyk, B. S. et al. Portal venous system thrombosis: helical CT angiography before transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation. Radiology 206, 179–186 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mori, H. et al. High-attenuation recent thrombus of the portal vein: CT demonstration and clinical significance. Radiology 163, 353–356 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. DeLeve, L. D., Valla, D. C. & Garcia-Tsao, G. Vascular disorders of the liver. Hepatology 49, 1729–1764 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sodickson, A. et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251, 175–184 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. American College of Radiology. Manual on Contrast Media version 8, 33–42 (2012).

  32. Shimada, K. et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison of imaging with three-dimensional half-fourier fast spin-echo and true steady-state free-precession sequences. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29, 1140–1146 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Berzigotti, A. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of liver surface and transient elastography in clinically doubtful cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 52, 846–853 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Colli, A. et al. Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection—analysis of 300 cases. Radiology 227, 89–94 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vilgrain, V. et al. Atrophy-hypertrophy complex in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein: CT evaluation. Radiology 241, 149–155 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hillaire, S. et al. Idiopathic non-cirrhotic intrahepatic portal hypertension in the West: a re-evaluation in 28 patients. Gut 51, 275–280 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Seijo, S. et al. Role of hepatic vein catheterisation and transient elastography in the diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension. Dig. Liver Dis. 44, 855–860 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma, P., Mishra, S. R., Kumar, M., Sharma, B. C. & Sarin, S. K. Liver and spleen stiffness in patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction. Radiology 263, 893–899 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Friedrich-Rust, M. et al. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography. Radiology 252, 595–604 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferraioli, G. et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology 56, 2125–2133 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harris, S., Nadkarni, N. A., Naina, H. V. & Vege, S. S. Splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis: a single-center experience. Pancreas 42, 1251–1254 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Calvet, X. et al. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma in Spain. Five year's experience in 249 cases. J. Hepatol. 10, 311–317 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Stuart, K. E., Anand, A. J. & Jenkins, R. L. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. Prognostic features, treatment outcome, and survival. Cancer 77, 2217–2222 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rossi, S. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and spiral computed tomography in the detection and characterization of portal vein thrombosis complicating hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. Radiol. 18, 1749–1756 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Raab, B. W. The thread and streak sign. Radiology 236, 284–285 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Catalano, O. A., Choy, G., Zhu, A., Hahn, P. F. & Sahani, D. V. Differentiation of malignant thrombus from bland thrombus of the portal vein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: application of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 254, 154–162 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Qian, L. J. et al. Differentiation of neoplastic from bland macroscopic portal vein thrombi using dual-energy spectral CT imaging: a pilot study. Eur. Radiol. 22, 2178–2185 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Piscaglia, F. et al. Criteria for diagnosing benign portal vein thrombosis in the assessment of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 16, 658–667 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. de Ville de Goyet, J. et al. Direct bypassing of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction in children: a new technique for combined hepatic portal revascularization and treatment of extrahepatic portal hypertension. J. Pediatr. Surg. 33, 597–601 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hanbidge, A. E., Lynch, D. & Wilson, S. R. US of the peritoneum. Radiographics 23, 663–684 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. de Ville de Goyet, J. et al. Meso-Rex bypass as an alternative technique for portal vein reconstruction at or after liver transplantation in children: review and perspectives. Pediatr. Transplant. 17, 19–26 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chaves, I. J. et al. Pre- and postoperative imaging and interventions for the meso-Rex bypass in children and young adults. Pediatr. Radiol. 42, 220–232 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Cakmak, O. et al. Role of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance portography in evaluating portal venous system compared with color Doppler ultrasonography. Abdom. Imaging 33, 65–71 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Seeger, M. et al. Chronic portal vein thrombosis: transcapsular hepatic collateral vessels and communicating ectopic varices. Radiology 257, 568–578 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Miyamoto, A. et al. Living-related liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for a patient with large spontaneous splenorenal collateral. Transplantation 75, 1596–1598 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Brancatelli, G., Federle, M. P., Pealer, K. & Geller, D. A. Portal venous thrombosis or sclerosis in liver transplantation candidates: preoperative CT findings and correlation with surgical procedure. Radiology 220, 321–328 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Luca, A. et al. Short- and long-term effects of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. Gut 60, 846–852 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dhiman, R. K., Behera, A., Chawla, Y. K., Dilawari, J. B. & Suri, S. Portal hypertensive biliopathy. Gut 56, 1001–1008 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Condat, B. et al. Portal cavernoma-associated cholangiopathy: a clinical and MR cholangiography coupled with MR portography imaging study. Hepatology 37, 1302–1308 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Llop, E. et al. Portal cholangiopathy: radiological classification and natural history. Gut 60, 853–860 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Galati, G. et al. A mocking finding: portal cavernoma mimicking neoplastic mass. First sign of myeloproliferative disorder in a patient with Janus kinase2 V617F mutation. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 21, 233–236 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Plessier, A., Rautou, P. E. & Valla, D. C. Management of hepatic vascular diseases. J. Hepatol. 56 (Suppl. 1), S25–S38 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Spaander, M. C. et al. Anticoagulant therapy in patients with non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis: effect on new thrombotic events and gastrointestinal bleeding. J. Thromb. Haemost. 11, 452–459 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Francoz, C., Valla, D. & Durand, F. Portal vein thrombosis, cirrhosis, and liver transplantation. J. Hepatol. 57, 203–212 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Luca, A. et al. Natural course of extrahepatic nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 265, 124–132 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Maruyama, H. et al. Prediction of the therapeutic effects of anticoagulation for recent portal vein thrombosis: a novel approach with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom. Imaging 37, 431–438 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Brenner, D. J. & Hall, E. J. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 2277–2284 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Reiter, T. et al. Minimizing risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 14, 31 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Berzigotti, A., Piscaglia, F. & EFSUMB Education and Professional Standard Committee. Clinical recommendations for the performance and reporting of ultrasound examination for portal hypertension European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology [online], (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are members of the Vascular Liver Diseases Group of the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona, and would like to express their gratitude to all the colleagues (clinicians, radiologists, anaesthesiologists and surgeons) that participate in the work of this multidisciplinary team. The authors thank the nursing and technical staff of the Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory and of the CDIC, and Ms C. Esteva for expert secretarial support. CIBERehd is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A. Berzigotti contributed to all aspects in the generation of this article. Á. García-Criado and A. Darnell contributed equally to researching data for the article, discussion of content and reviewing/editing the manuscript before submission. J.-C. García-Pagán substantially contributed to the discussion of content and reviewed/edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annalisa Berzigotti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berzigotti, A., García-Criado, Á., Darnell, A. et al. Imaging in clinical decision-making for portal vein thrombosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11, 308–316 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.258

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.258

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing