Perspective
Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 458-463 (June 2008) | doi:10.1038/nrg2338
Focus on: Global Challenges
Science and society: Opposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames
Ronald J. Herring1 About the author
Abstract
Genetic engineering has enabled significant, accepted innovations in medicine and other fields. In agriculture, however, a global cognitive divide around 'genetically modified organisms' (GMOs) has limited the diffusion and scope of this technology. The framing of agricultural products of recombinant DNA technology as GMOs lacks biological coherence, but has proved to be a powerful frame for opposition. Disaggregating the concept of the 'GMO' is a necessary condition for confronting misconceptions that constrain the use of biotechnology in addressing imperatives of development and escalating challenges from nature, especially in less-industrialized nations.
Author affiliations
-
Ronald J. Herring is at the Department of Government, Cornell University, White Hall 313, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Email: rjh5@cornell.edu
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Biotechnology in the Food IndustryBio/Technology Article (01 Aug 1993)
Collective Action and Civil Disobedience: The Anti-GMO Campaign of the Faucheurs VolontairesFrench Politics Research Article
