Perspective

Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 458-463 (June 2008) | doi:10.1038/nrg2338

Focus on: Global Challenges

Science and societyOpposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames

Ronald J. Herring1  About the author

Top

Genetic engineering has enabled significant, accepted innovations in medicine and other fields. In agriculture, however, a global cognitive divide around 'genetically modified organisms' (GMOs) has limited the diffusion and scope of this technology. The framing of agricultural products of recombinant DNA technology as GMOs lacks biological coherence, but has proved to be a powerful frame for opposition. Disaggregating the concept of the 'GMO' is a necessary condition for confronting misconceptions that constrain the use of biotechnology in addressing imperatives of development and escalating challenges from nature, especially in less-industrialized nations.

Author affiliations

  1. Ronald J. Herring is at the Department of Government, Cornell University, White Hall 313, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
    Email: rjh5@cornell.edu

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

Subscribe

Subscribe to Nature Reviews Genetics

Search PubMed for

naturejobs

natureproducts


Advertisement