Key Points
-
Because mobile DNA sequences replicate during transposition and can harm their hosts, they can be seen as selfish DNA sequences.
-
The interaction between mobile DNA sequences and their hosts makes the genome analogous to an ecological community, and many of the questions about the mobile DNA–host interaction have parallels with ecological questions.
-
Some of these questions are those that determine the expected abundance and diversity of mobile DNA sequences in the genome, and the factors that determine whether mobile DNA sequences will evolve to regulate their own activities.
-
Movement between host species creates a situation for transposable elements that is analogous to that of species living as metapopulations.
-
Beneficial effects for hosts from their interactions with mobile DNA sequences might include both short- and longer-term phenomena.
-
Benefits from the use of this ecological analogy might be in the identification of useful questions about transposable-element biology and evolution.
Abstract
The genomes of multicellular eukaryotes provide information that determines the phenotype. However, not all sequences in the genome are required for this purpose. Other sequences are often selfish in their actions and interact in complex ways. Here, an analogy is developed between the components of the genome, including mobile DNA elements, and an ecological community. Unlike ecological communities, however, the slow rates at which genomes change allow us to reconstruct patterns of interaction that stretch back tens or hundreds of millions of years.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kidwell, M. G. & Lisch, D. Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7704–7711 (1997).
Pasyukova, E. G., Nuzhdin, S. V., Morozova, T. V. & Mackay, T. F. C. Accumulation of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster is associated with a decrease in fitness. J. Hered. 95, 284–290 (2004). In lines that are derived from one laboratory strain of D. melanogaster , 2b, there is great divergence in transposable-element copy number. There is a significant negative correlation across lines between fitness and copy number. No significant correlation was found in the corresponding study of another set of sublines from the Harwich strain.
Houle, D. & Nuzhdin, S. V. Mutation accumulation and the effect of copia insertions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 83, 7–18 (2004).
Charlesworth, B., Borthwick, H., Bartolomé, C. & Pignatelli, P. Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167, 815–826 (2004).
Vinogradov, A. E. Selfish DNA is maladaptive: evidence from the plant Red List. Trends Genet. 19, 609–613 (2003). A study that finds evidence for a harmful effect of mobile DNA sequences that is different from their effects on individual Darwinian fitness, which has been the focus of earlier studies. The relative successes of species are correlated with genome size.
Zhang, X. Y. & Wessler, S. R. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the transposable elements in the related species Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica oleracea. Proc. Natl Acac. Sci. USA 101, 5589–5594 (2004).
Vinogradov, A. E. Genome size and extinction risk in vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 1701–1705 (2004).
Orgel, L. E. & Crick, F. H. C. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284, 604–606 (1980).
Doolittle, W. F. & Sapienza, C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284, 601–603 (1980).
Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1976).
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Jurka, J., Kohany, O., Pavlicek, A., Kapitonov, V. V. & Jurka, M. V. Duplication, coclustering and selection of human Alu retrotransposons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1268–1272 (2004).
Otieno, A. C. et al. Analysis of the human Alu Ya-lineage. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 109–118 (2004).
McAllister, B. F. & Werren, J. H. Phylogenetic analysis of a retrotransposon with implications for strong evolutionary constraints on reverse transcriptase. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 69–80 (1997).
Adey, N. B., Tollefsbol, T. O., Sparks, A. B., Edgell, M. H. & Hutchinson, C. A. Molecular resurrection of an ancient ancestral promoter for mouse L1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 1569–1573 (1994).
Ivics, Z., Hackett, P. B., Plasterk, R. H. & Izsvak, Z. Molecular reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc-1 like transposon in fish, and its transposition in human cells. Cell 91, 501–510 (1997).
Miskey, C., Izsvak, Z., Plasterk, R. H. & Ivics, Z. The Frog Prince: a reconstructed transposon from Rana pipiens with high transpositional activity in vertebrate cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 6873–6881 (2003). The Frog Prince element was created using the consensus of Tc1/ mariner family members from the frog Rana pipiens , and had a higher transpositional activity in zebrafish cells than Sleeping Beauty did (see reference 16).
Dewannieux, M., Esnault, C. & Heidmann, T. LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences. Nature Genetics 35, 41–48 (2003). A demonstration of Alu transposition in HeLa cells driven by L1-encoded endonuclease and reverse transcriptase.
Schmid, C. W. Alu: a parasite's parasite? Nature Genet. 35, 15–16 (2003).
Roy-Engel, A. M. et al. Active Alu element “A-tails”: size does matter. Genome Res. 12, 1333–1344 (2002).
Hagan, C. R., Sheffield, R. F. & Rudin, C. M. Human Alu element retrotransposition induced by genotoxic stress. Nature Genet. 35, 219–220 (2003).
Kajikawa, M. & Okada, N. LINEs mobilize SINEs in the eel through a shared 3′ sequence. Cell 111, 433–444 (2002).
Langley, C. H., Montgomery, E., Hudson, R. R., Kaplan, N. & Charlesworth, B. On the role of unequal exchange in the containment of transposable element copy number. Genet. Res. 52, 223–235 (1988).
Eickbush, T. H. & Furano, A. V. Fruit flies and humans respond differently to retrotransposons. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 669–674 (2002).
Biedler, J. & Tu, Z. J. Non-LTR retrotransposons in the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae: unprecedented diversity and evidence of recent activity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1811–1825 (2003).
Duvernell, D. D., Pryor, S. R. & Adams, S. M. Teleost fish contain a diverse array of L1 retrotransposon lineages that exhibit a low copy number and high rate of turnover. J. Mol. Evol. 59, 298–308 (2004).
Furano, A. V., Duvernell, D. D. & Boissinot, S. LI (L1) retrotransposon diversity differs dramatically between mammals and fish. Trends Genet. 20, 9–14 (2004).
Charlesworth, B. & Langley, C. H. The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements. Annu. Rev. Genet. 23, 251–287 (1989).
Charlesworth, B. & Langley, C. H. The evolution of self-regulated transposition of transposable elements. Genetics 112, 359–383 (1986).
Perepelitsa-Belancio, V. & Deininger, P. RNA truncation by premature polyadenylation attenuates human mobile element activity. Nature Genet. 35, 363–366 (2003).
Han, J. S., Szak, S. T. & Boeke, J. D. Transcriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes. Nature 429, 268–274 (2004).
Han, J. S. & Boeke, J. D. A highly active synthetic mammalian retrotransposon. Nature 429, 314–318 (2004). These authors report a remarkable synthesis of an altered L1 element with an unchanged amino-acid sequence, but with a 24% change in the nucleic-acid sequence. The altered element was able to overcome the transcriptional termination problem that is associated with the wild-type L1 sequence and had a greatly enhanced transposition rate.
Bushman, F. Gene regulation: selfish elements make a mark. Nature 429, 253–255 (2004).
Heredia, F., Loreto, E. L. S. & Valente, V. L. S. Complex evolution of gypsy in drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1831–1842 (2004). The gypsy sequence has apparently made several horizontal transfers in Drosophila species and closely related genera.
Hartl, D. L., Lohe, A. R. & Lozovskaya, E. R. Modern thoughts on an ancyent marinere: function, evolution, regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 31, 337–358 (1997).
Brookfield, J. F. Y. Models of repression of transposition in P–M hybrid dysgenesis by P cytotype and by zygotically encoded repressor proteins. Genetics 128, 471–486 (1991).
Brookfield, J. F. Y. Models of the spread of non-autonomous selfish transposable elements when transposition and fitness are coupled. Genet. Res. 67, 199–209 (1996).
Brookfield, J. F. Y. & Badge, R. M. Population genetics models of transposable elements. Genetica 100, 281–294 (1997).
Pinsker, W., Haring, E., Hagemann, S. & Miller, R. J. The evolutionary life history of P transposons: from horizontal invaders to domesticated neogenes. Chromosoma 110, 148–158 (2001).
Vastenhouw, N. L. & Plasterk, R. H. A. RNAi protects the Caenorhabditis elegans germline against transposition. Trends Genet. 20, 314–319 (2004).
Jensen, S., Gassama, M. -P. & Heidmann, T. Taming of transposable elements by homology-dependent gene silencing. Nature Genet. 21, 209–212 (1999).
Galagan, J. E. & Selker, E. U. RIP: the evolutionary cost of genome defense. Trends Genet. 20, 417–423 (2004).
Yoder, J. A., Walsh, C. P. & Bestor, T. H. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 13, 335–340 (1997).
Kidwell, M. G. & Lisch, D. R. Transposable elements and host genome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 95–99 (2000).
Prak, E. T. & Kazazian, H. H. Mobile elements and the human genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 1, 134–144 (2000).
Deininger, P. L., Moran, J. V., Batzer, M. A. & Kazazian, H. H. Mobile elements and mammalian genome evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 651–658 (2003).
Kazazian, H. H. Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303, 1626–1632 (2004).
Moran, J. V. et al. High frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells. Cell 87, 917–927 (1996).
Brouha, B. et al. Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5280–5285 (2003). There are approximately 80 active L1 sequences in the human genome. Of these, six highly active sequences seem to account for 84% of the total transpositional activity.
Lutz, S. M., Vincent, B. J., Kazazian, H. H., Balzer, M. A. & Moran, J. V. Allelic heterogeneity in L1 retrotransposition activity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 1431–1437 (2004).
Maside, X, Bartolomé, C. & Charlesworth, B. S-element insertions are associated with the evolution of the HSP70 genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 12, 1686–1691 (2002).
Schlenke, T. A. & Begun, D. J. Strong selective sweep associated with a transposon insertion in Drosophila simulans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1626–1631 (2004).
Lynch, C. & Tristem, M. A co-opted gypsy-type LTR-retrotransposon is conserved in the genomes of humans, sheep, mice and rats. Curr. Biol. 13, 1518–1523 (2003).
Agrawal, A., Eastman, Q. M. & Schatz, D. G. Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and its implications for the evolution of the immune system. Nature 394, 744–751 (1998).
Pardue, M. L. & Debaryshe, P. G. Retrotransposons provide an evolutionarily robust non-telomerase mechanism to maintain telomeres. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 485–511 (2003).
Abad, J. P. et al. Genomic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster telomeres: full-length copies of HeT-A and TART elements at telomeres. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1613–1619 (2004).
Walter, M. F. & Biessmann, H. Expression of the telomeric retrotransposon Het-A in Drosophila melanogaster is correlated with cell proliferation. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 211–219 (2004).
Bailey, J. A., Liu, G. & Eichler, E. E. An Alu transposition model for the origin and expansion of human segmental duplications. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 823–834 (2003).
Moran, J. V., DeBernardinis, R. J. & Kazazian, H. H. Exon shuffling by L1 retrotransposition. Science 283, 1530–1534 (1999).
Jiang, N., Bao, Z. R., Zhang, X. Y., Eddy, S. R. & Wessler, S. R. Pack-MULE transposable elements mediate gene evolution in plants. Nature 431, 569–573 (2004).
Van de Lagemaat, L. N., Landry, J. -R., Mager, D. L. & Medstrand, P. Transposable elements in mammals promote regulatory variation and diversification of genes with specialised functions. Trends Genet. 19, 530–536 (2003).
Jordan, I. K., Rogozin, I. B., Glazko, G. V. & Koonin, E. V. Origin of a substantial fraction of human regulatory sequences from transposable elements. Trends Genet. 19, 68–72 (2003).
Lippmann, Z. et al. Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control Nature 430, 471–476 (2004).
Greally, J. M. Short interspersed transposable elements (SINEs) are excluded from imprinted regions in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 327–332 (2002).
Allen, E. et al. High concentrations of long interspersed nuclear element sequence distinguish monoallelically expressed genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9940–9945 (2003).
Ke, X. & Collins, A. CpG islands in human X-inactivation. Ann. Hum. Genet. 67, 242–249 (2003).
Ke, X. Y., Thomas, N. S., Robinson, D. O. & Collins, A. A novel approach for identifying candidate imprinted genes through sequence analysis of imprinted and control genes. Hum. Genet. 111, 511–520 (2002).
Ke, X. Y., Thomas, N. S., Robinson, D. O. & Collins, A. The distinguishing sequence characteristics of mouse imprinted genes. Mamm. Genome 13, 639–645 (2002).
Malakowski, W., Mitchell, G. A. & Labuda, D. Alu sequences in the coding sequences of mRNA: a source of protein variability. Trends Genet. 10, 183–193 (1994).
Lev-Maor, G., Sorek, R., Shomron, N. & Ast, G. The birth of an alternatively spliced exon: 3′ splice-site selection in Alu exons. Science 300, 1288–1291 (2003).
Sorek, R., Ast, G. & Graur, D. Alu-containing exons are alternatively spliced. Genome Res. 12, 1060–1067 (2002).
Ast, G. How did alternative splicing evolve? Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 773–782 (2004).
Sniegowski, P. D., Gerrish, P. J. & Lenski, R. E. Evolution of high mutation rates in experimental populations of E. coli. Nature 387, 703–705 (1997).
Giraud, A. et al. Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in mouse gut. Science 291, 2606–2608 (2001).
Tanaka, M. M., Bergstrom, M. M. & Levin, B. R. The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. Genetics 164, 843–854 (2003).
Taddei, F. et al. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature 387, 700–702 (1997).
Travis, J. M. J. & Travis, E. R. Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 591–597 (2002).
Edwards, R. J. & Brookfield, J. F. Y. Transiently beneficial insertions could maintain mobile DNA sequences in variable environments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 30–37 (2003).
Edwards, R. J., Sockett, R. E. & Brookfield, J. F. Y. A simple method for genome-wide screening for advantageous insertions of mobile DNAs in Escherichia coli. Curr. Biol. 12, 863–867 (2002).
Sniegowski, P. D., Gerrish, P. J., Johnson, T. & Shaver, A. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. Bioessays 22, 1057–1066 (2000).
Raup, D. M. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1993).
Lotka, A. J. Elements of Physical Biology (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1925).
Volterra, V. Leçons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte pour la Vie (Gauthiers–Villars, Paris, 1931).
Gause, G. F. The Struggle for Existence (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1934).
Charlesworth, B., Sniegowski, P. & Stephan, W. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371, 215–220 (1994).
Langley, C. H., Brookfield, J. F. Y. & Kaplan, N. L. Transposable elements in Mendelian populations. I. A theory. Genetics 104, 457–471 (1983).
Biémont, C. et al. Population dynamics of the copia, mdg1, mdg3, gypsy and P transposable elements in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 63, 197–212 (1994).
Viera, C., Nardon, C., Arpin, C., Lepitit, D. & Biémont, C. Evolution of genome size in Drosophila: is the invader's genome being invaded by transposable elements? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1154–1161 (2002).
Viera, C. & Biémont, C. Transposable element dynamics in two sibling species: Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Genetica 120, 1150–123 (2004).
Hedges, D. J. et al. Differential Alu mobilization and polymorphism among the human and chimpanzee lineages. Genome Res. 14, 1068–1075 (2004). The Alu sequence seems to have created fewer new insertions in the chimpanzee than in the human lineage, owing apparently to the inactivities in the chimpanzee of the sequence subfamilies that are most active in humans.
Acknowledgements
I thank L. Johnson, R. Edwards, H. Nicholas, M. Carr, P. Emery, R. Duddington, T. Robinson, J. McGraw and R. Badge for stimulating discussions about mobile DNAs. I also thank the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Related links
Glossary
- FITNESS
-
The expected ability of an organism to survive and reproduce, measured as the number of surviving offspring that are produced. Inclusive fitness is a broader term that includes benefits that are accrued to relatives of an individual.
- ECOLOGICAL NICHE
-
The role of a species of organisms in an ecological community, defined by the resources that the species requires from its environment. The 'competitive exclusion principle' implies that species can only stably coexist if they have different ecological niches.
- OPTIMAL FORAGING THEORY
-
A theory that is designed to predict the foraging behaviour that maximizes food intake per unit time.
- SELFISH DNA
-
Sequences of DNA that accumulate in the genome through non-selective means, and which have a negative effect on the fitnesses of their hosts.
- SINE SEQUENCE
-
A short interspersed element sequence — this is a retroposon sequence of less than 500 bp in length that does not encode the protein activities required for its movement.
- LINE SEQUENCE
-
A long interspersed element sequence — typically used for non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons.
- RETROTRANSPOSON
-
An autonomous transposable element that can move to a new location through an RNA intermediate. Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons have direct repeats of 300–500 bp of DNA at each end of the element. These sequences resemble the integrated proviruses of retroviruses. Non-LTR retrotransposons lack LTRs and the organization of their coding sequences is more diverged from that of retroviral sequences.
- RETROPOSON
-
A mobile DNA sequence that can move to new locations through an RNA intermediate.
- AUTONOMOUS ELEMENT
-
A transposable element that can supply all the requirements in both cis and trans for its own movement. In the case of a DNA transposon, this would include the trans-acting transposase protein and the element termini, required in cis for movement. A non-autonomous element would possess only the cis-acting sequences and would have to be supplied with transposase to move.
- TELEOST
-
The group of bony fishes of the subclass Teleostei.
- PANMICTIC
-
Referring to unstructured (random-mating) populations.
- GENETIC DRIFT
-
Random changes in allele frequency that occur because the genes appearing in offspring are not a perfectly representative sample of the parental genes (for example, in small populations).
- EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE
-
(Ne). The size of a population measured by the expected effect (through genetic drift) of the population size on genetic variablity. Ne is related to, but never exceeds, the actual population size (N).
- DNA TRANSPOSON
-
A mobile DNA sequence that moves to new genomic locations through a DNA route, rather than through an RNA intermediate. This movement is catalysed by the action of a transposase protein that is encoded by an autonomous element.
- METAPOPULATION
-
A collection of populations of a species found in differing geographic locations and with restricted gene flow (exchange of genes) between the populations.
- RNA INTERFERENCE
-
The process by which dsRNA silences homologous genes.
- SELECTIVE SWEEP
-
The process by which new favourable mutations become fixed so quickly that physically linked alleles also become fixed by 'hitch-hiking'.
- TROPHIC
-
Of or involving the feeding habits or food relationship of different organisms in a food chain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brookfield, J. The ecology of the genome — mobile DNA elements and their hosts. Nat Rev Genet 6, 128–136 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1524
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1524
This article is cited by
-
Intracellular common gardens reveal niche differentiation in transposable element community during bacterial adaptive evolution
The ISME Journal (2023)
-
Do transposable elements have functions of their very own?
Biology & Philosophy (2022)
-
Removal of beneficial insertion effects prevent the long-term persistence of transposable elements within simulated asexual populations
BMC Genomics (2021)
-
Variation in base composition underlies functional and evolutionary divergence in non-LTR retrotransposons
Mobile DNA (2020)
-
A genomic survey of transposable elements in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta reveals selection on codon usage
Mobile DNA (2019)