Abstract
Informed consent is a vital ethical doctrine in clinical medicine and, through genetic counselling, is being applied to genetic testing. But genetic testing raises issues that transcend the traditional concept of informed consent. Genetic tests are adopted without demonstrable clinical benefit, and the consequences of testing can reach beyond the individual to their families and communities. Understanding the social and cultural context of genetic testing will lead to more informed discussion and debate on these issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Health professionals’ views and experiences of the Australian moratorium on genetic testing and life insurance: A qualitative study
European Journal of Human Genetics Open Access 28 July 2022
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rapp, R. Chromosomes and communication: the discourse of genetic counselling. Med. Anthrop. Quart. 2,143–157 ( 1988).
Lippman, A. in The Future of Human Reproduction (ed. Overall, C.) 182– 194 (The Women's Press, Toronto, 1989).
Clarke, A. Is non-directive genetic counselling possible? Lancet 338, 998–1001 (1991).
Farrer, L. A. Suicide and attempted suicide in Huntington disease: implications for preclinical testing of persons at risk. Am. J. Med. Genet. 24, 305–3111 (1986).
Kessler, S. & Bloch, M. Social system responses to Huntington disease. Family Processes 28, 59– 68 (1989).
Fox, S., Bloch, M., Fahy, M. & Hayden, M. R. Predictive testing for Huntington disease: description of a pilot study in British Columbia. Am. J. Med. Genet. 32, 211–216 (1988).
Benjamin, C. M. et al. and the Canadian collaborative groups for predictive testing for Huntington disease. Proceed with care: direct predictive testing for Huntington disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55, 606–617 (1994).
Quaid, K. A. Presymptomatic testing for Huntington disease: recommendations for counselling . Am. J. Med. Genet. 39, 347– 354 (1992).
Biesecker, B. B. & Marteau, T. M. The future of genetic counselling: an international perspective. Nature Genet. 22, 133–137 ( 1999).
DeGrazia, D. The ethical justification for minimal paternalism in the use of the predictive test for Huntington's disease. J. Clin. Ethics 2, 219–228 (1991).
Burgess, M. M. & Hayden, M. R. Patients' rights to laboratory data: trinucleotide repeat length in Huntington disease. Am. J. Med. Genet. 162, 6–9 (1996).
Koenig, B. et al. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: recommendations of the Stanford program in genomics, ethics and society. J. Women's Health 7, 531–545 ( 1998).
Kerr, A. & Cunningham-Burley, S. On ambivalence and risk: reflexive modernity and the new human genetics. Sociology 34, 283–304 (2000).
Burgess, M. M. in The Commercialization of Genetics Research: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues (eds Caulfield, T. A. & Williams-Jones, B.) 181– 194 (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999 ).
Nelkin, D. & Lindee, M. S. . The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon (New York: Freeman, 1995).
Harper, P. S. Direct marketing of cystic fibrosis carrier screening: commercial push or population need? J. Med. Genet. 32, 249– 250 (1995).
Huggins, M. et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am. J. Med. Genet. 42, 508 (1992 ).
Vineis, P. & Schulte, P. A. Scientific and ethical aspects of genetic screening of workers for cancer risk: the case of N-acetyltransferase phenotype. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 48, 189– 197 (1995).
MacDonald, C. & Williams–Jones, B. Ethics and genetics: susceptibility testing in the workplace. J. Business Ethics (submitted).
Lemmens, T. What about your genes? Ethical, legal and policy dimensions of genetics in the workplace. Politics and the Life Sciences 16, 57–75 (1997).
Working Group on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Human Genome Research. Genetic Information and Health Insurance. Report of the Task Force: (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 1993).
Abbott, A. Israel split on rights to genetic privacy. Nature 394 , 214 (1998).
McGleenan, T., Weising, U. & Ewald, F. (eds) Genetics and Insurance (Springer, New York, 1999).
NIH-DOE Working Group on Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Human Genome Research. Genetic Information and Health Insurance (Human Genome Project, Washington DC, 1993).
Lemmens, T. & Bahamin, P. in Socio-Ethical Issues in Human Genetics (ed. Knoppers, B. M.) 115–275 (Les Editions Yvons-Blais Inc., Cowansville, Quebec, 1998).
Greely, H. T. in The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (eds Kelves, D. J. & Hood, L.) 274–280 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992).
McGleenan, T. & Wiesing, U. in Genetics and Insurance (eds McGleenan, T. et al.) 116–117 (Springer, New York, 1999).
Murray, T. Genetics and the moral mission of health insurance. Hastings Center Report 22, 12–15 ( 1992).
Wilkie, T. Genetics and insurance in Britain: why more than just the Atlantic divides the English-speaking nations. Nature Genet. 20, 119–121 (1998).
Dutch Health Council. Genetics, Science & Society (Dutch Health Council, The Hague, 1989).
Sandberg, P. Genetic information and life insurance: a proposal for an ethical European policy. Social Sci. Med. 40, 1549– 1559 (1995).
Collins, F. cited in Wadman, M. News: Jewish leaders meet NIH chiefs on genetic stigmatisation fears. Nature 392, 851 ( 1998).
Editorial. Privacy matters. Nature Genet. 19, 207–208 ( 1998).
Weijer, C., Goldsand, G. & Emanuel, E. J. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genet. 23, 275–280 (1999).
Weijer, C. Protecting communities in research: Philosophical and pragmatic challenges . Cam. Q. Health Ethics 8, 501– 513 (1999).
Burgess, M. M. & Brunger, F. in The Governance of Health Research involving Human Subjects (ed. McDonald, M.) 141–175 (Law Commission of Canada, Ottawa, 2000). Also see http://www.lcc.gc.ca/en/themes/gr/hrish/macdonald/macdonald.pdf
Foster. M. W., Berensten, D. & Carter, T. H., A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 696–702 (1998).
Scheuermann, R. H. & Picker, L. J. Letter to the editor. Nature 392, 14 ( 1998).
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (CIOMS, Geneva, 1993 ).
Weijer, C., Goldsand, G. & Emanuel, E. J. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genet. 23, 275–280 (1999).
Burgess, M. M. & Brunger, F. in The Governance of Health Research involving Human Subjects (ed. McDonald, M.) 14–175 (Law Commission of Canada, 2000). Also see http://www.lcc.gc.ca/en/papers/macdonald/macdonald.pdf
Stephenson, P. in A Cross-Cultural Dialogue on Health Care Ethics (eds Coward, H. & Ratanakul, P.) 68–91. (Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press, 1999),
Brunger, F. & Bassett, K. Culture and Genetics in Socio-ethical Issues in Human Genetics (ed. Knoppers, B. M.) 30– 34 (Les Editions Yvon Blais Inc., Cowansville, Quebec, 1998).
Sclove, R. E. Democracy and Technology (The Guilford Press, New York, 1995).
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S. & Amos, A. The new genetics and health: Mobilizing lay expertise . Public Understanding of Science 7, 41– 60 (1998).
Kerr, A., Cunningham–Burley, S. & Amos, A. Drawing the line: an analysis of lay people's discussions about the new genetics. Public Understanding of Science 7, 113–133 ( 1998).
Acknowledgements
Bryn William Jones has assisted with the editing and referencing of this article. M.M.B.'s work is part of the Ethics and Genetics Research Group at UBC, with projects supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Law Commission of Canada, the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, the Huntington Society of Canada, the Lohn Foundation and the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
DATABASE LINKS
FURTHER INFORMATION
Glossary
- AUTONOMY
-
The capacity to be rational and self-directing. Autonomy creates the possibility of moral responsibility, and is therefore accorded strong ethical protection in bioethics.
- COMMUNITY
-
Communities usually share some element of value or practice that provides cohesiveness despite considerable heterogeneity. Aggregates might be identified as having a common feature, such as a disease, but lack any social cohesiveness. Disease-related groups might move from being an aggregate to a community as they organize activities around their common features.
- CULTURE
-
Culture is constituted by the practices and assumptions that underlie a group's everyday activities, and is typically heterogeneous and constantly evolving.
- INFORMED CONSENT
-
A doctrine intended to assure patient participation in health-care decisions. It requires that the recommended and alternative interventions be explained, together with their harms and benefits. Authorization of treatment is based on comprehension of this information and voluntary agreement.
- STANDARD OF PRACTICE
-
Historically rooted in clinical practice, the standard of practice is the service or intervention that is recognized by the relevant group of health professionals as appropriate care. The move to evidence-based standards of practice evaluates whether the benefits of a new intervention outweigh the possible harms.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, M. Beyond consent: ethical and social issues in genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet 2, 147–151 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35052579
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35052579
This article is cited by
-
Health professionals’ views and experiences of the Australian moratorium on genetic testing and life insurance: A qualitative study
European Journal of Human Genetics (2022)
-
Conflict of Interest Policies at Canadian Universities: Clarity and Content
Journal of Academic Ethics (2008)
-
Are Good Intentions Good Enough?: Informed Consent Without Trained Interpreters
Journal of General Internal Medicine (2007)
-
Democracy and genetic privacy: The value of bodily integrity
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (2005)
-
Deconstructing the relationship between genetics and race
Nature Reviews Genetics (2004)