Key Points
-
A comprehensive foot examination is essential for the appropriate assessment, prevention and management of diabetic foot complications
-
Peripheral neuropathy is concurrent with 90% of foot ulcers and is a major contributor to the development of ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus
-
Many patients with diabetes mellitus who have peripheral vascular disease are asymptomatic until they develop tissue loss
-
In the context of tissue loss, increasing ischaemia elevates the risk of limb loss and, therefore, healing usually requires revascularization
-
Revascularization can be performed using endovascular or open surgery techniques, or a combination of both, and depends on the patient's health, the location of the disease and local surgical expertise
-
Offloading, debridement, antibiotics, optimal glycaemic control and a multidisciplinary team are fundamental to the effective treatment of diabetic foot complications
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is associated with a series of macrovascular and microvascular changes that can manifest as a wide range of complications. Foot ulcerations affect ∼2–4% of patients with diabetes mellitus. Risk factors for foot lesions include peripheral and autonomic neuropathy, vascular disease and previous foot ulceration, as well as other microvascular complications, such as retinopathy and end-stage renal disease. Ulceration is the result of a combination of components that together lead to tissue breakdown. The most frequently occurring causal pathways to the development of foot ulcers include peripheral neuropathy and vascular disease, foot deformity or trauma. Peripheral vascular disease is often not diagnosed in patients with diabetes mellitus until tissue loss is evident, usually in the form of a nonhealing ulcer. Identification of patients with diabetes mellitus who are at high risk of ulceration is important and can be achieved via annual foot screening with subsequent multidisciplinary foot-care interventions. Understanding the factors that place patients with diabetes mellitus at high risk of ulceration, together with an appreciation of the links between different aspects of the disease process, is essential to the prevention and management of diabetic foot complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boulton, A. J. The pathway to foot ulceration in diabetes. Med. Clin. North Am. 97, 775–790 (2013).
Singh, N., Armstrong, D. G. & Lipsky, B. A. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 293, 217–228 (2005).
Kerr, M., Rayman, G. & Jeffcoate, W. J. Cost of diabetic foot disease to the National Health Service in England. Diabetic Med. 31, 1498–1504 (2014).
Armstrong, D. G. et al. Mind the gap: disparity between research funding and costs of care for diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 36, 1815–1817 (2013).
Armstrong, D. G., Wrobel, J. & Robbins, J. M. Are diabetes-related wounds worse than cancer? Int. Wound J. 4, 286–287 (2007).
Lavery, L. A., Hunt, N. A., Ndip, A., Lavery, D. C. & Boulton, A. J. Impact of chronic kidney disease on survival after amputation in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 33, 2365–2369 (2010).
Buse, J. B. et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American heart association and the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care 115, 114–126 (2007).
NICE. Lower limb peripheral arterial disease: diagnosis and management. NICE guidelines [CG147] [online], (2012).
Jeffcoate, W. J. & Harding, K. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 361, 1545–1551 (2003).
Abbott, C. A. et al. The North West Diabetes Foot Care Study: Incidence of and risk factors for new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based cohort. Diabetic Med. 19, 377–384 (2002).
Muller, I. S. et al. Foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in Dutch primary health care. Diabetes Care 25, 570–574 (2002).
Abbott, C. A. et al. Foot ulcer risk is lower in South Asian and African-Caribbean compared to European diabetic patients in the UK: the North-West diabetes foot care study. Diabetes Care 28, 1869–1875 (2005).
Monteiro-Soares, M. et al. Predictive factors for diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 28, 574–600 (2012).
Leese, G., Stang, D. & McKnight, J. A national strategic approach to diabetic foot disease in Scotland: a changing culture. Br. J. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. 11, 69–73 (2011).
Margolis, D. J. & Jeffcoate, W. J. Epidemiology of foot ulceration and amputation. Med. Clin. N. Amer. 97, 7791–7805 (2013).
Boulton, A. J. M. in Evidence Based Management of Diabetes (eds Giten, V. & Busen, J.) 367–382 (TFM Publishing, 2012).
Vamos, E. P., Bottle, A. & Edmonds, M. E. Changes in the incidence of lower extremity amputations in individuals with and without diabetes in England between 2004 and 2008. Diabetes Care 33, 2592–2597 (2010).
Holman, N., Young, R. J. & Jeffcoate, W. J. Variation in the recorded incidence of amputation of the lower limb in England. Diabetologia 55, 1919–1925 (2012).
Kennon, B., Leese, G. P. & Cochrane, L. Reduced incidence of lower-extremity amputations in people with diabetes in Scotland: a nationwide study. Diabetes Care 35, 2588–2590 (2012).
Chevreul, K., Berg Brigham, K. & Bouché, C. The burden and treatment of diabetes in France. Global Health 10, 6 (2014).
Pickwell, K. et al. Predictors of lower extremity amputation in patients with an infected diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Care 38, 852–857 (2015).
Hadadi, A. et al. Diabetic foot: infections and outcomes in Iranian admitted patients. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 7, e11680 (2014).
Boulton, A. J. M., Vileikyte, L., Ragnarson-Tennvall, G. & Apelqvist, J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 366, 1721–1726 (2005).
Boulton, A. J. M., Gries, J. A. & Jervell, J. A. Guidelines for the diagnosis and outpatient management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Special Report. Diabetic Med. 15, 508–514 (1998).
Boulton, A. J. M., Malik, R. A., Arezzo, J. & Sosenko, J. M. Diabetic somatic neuropathies. Diabetes Care 27, 1458–1486 (2004).
Dyck, P. J. et al. The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology 43, 817–824 (1993).
Tesfaye, S., Boulton, A. J. M. & Dickenson, A. H. Mechanisms and management of diabetic painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care 36, 2456–2465 (2013).
Dyck, P. J. et al. Diabetic polyneuropathies: update on research definition, diagnostic criteria and estimation of severity. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 27, 620 (2011).
Vileikyte, L. et al. Foot ulcer risk is lower in South Asian and African-Caribbean compared to European diabetic patients in the UK. The North-West diabetes foot care study. Diabetes Care 28, 1869–1875 (2005).
Smith, A. G. & Singleton, J. R. Impaired glucose tolerance and neuropathy. Neurologist 14, 23–29 (2008).
Tesfaye, S. et al. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 12, 65–68 (2011).
Davis, J. L. et al. Peripheral diabetic neuropathy treated with amitryptiline and fluphenazine. JAMA 238, 2291–2292 (1977).
Sultan, A., Gaskell, H., Derry, S. & Moore, R. A. Duloxetine for painful diabetic neuropathy and fibromyalgia pain: a systematic review of randomised trials. BMC Neurol. 29, 1471–2377 (2008).
Caraceni, A. et al. Gabapentin for neuropathic cancer pain: a randomized controlled trial from the Gabapentin Cancer Pain Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 2909–2917 (2004).
Backonja, M. et al. Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 280, 1831–1836 (1998).
Freeman, R., Durso-Decruz, E. & Emir, B. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of pregabalin treatment for painful peripheral neuropathy: findings from seven randomised, controlled trials across a range of doses. Diabetes Care 31, 1448–1454 (2008).
Morris, S. J., Shore, A. C. & Tooke, J. E. Responses of the skin microcirculation to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 38, 1337–1344 (1995).
Ryder, R. E. et al. Autonomic dennervation may be a prerequisite of diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration. Diabetic Med. 7, 726–730 (1990).
LeFrandt, J. D. et al. Sympathetic mediated vasomotion and skin capillary permeability in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. Diabetologia 246, 40–47 (2003).
Norgren, L. et al. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J. Vasc. Surg. 45 (Suppl.), S5–S67 (2007).
McDermott, M. M. et al. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease is associated with more adverse lower extremity characteristics than intermittent claudication. Circulation 117, 2484–2491 (2008).
Fowkes F. G. et al. Edinburgh Artery Study: prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int. J. Epidemiol. 20, 384–392 (1991).
Becker, F. et al. Chapter I: Definitions, epidemiology, clinical presentation and prognosis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 42 (Suppl. 2), S4–S12 (2011).
Boyko, E. J., Ahroni, J. H., Cohen, V., Nelson, K. M. & Heagerty, P. J. Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer occurrence using commonly available clinical information: the Seattle Diabetic Foot Study. Diabetes Care 29, 1202–1207 (2006).
Game, F. L., Chipchase, S. Y., Hubbard, R., Burden, R. P. & Jeffcoate, W. J. Temporal association between the incidence of foot ulceration and the start of dialysis in diabetes mellitus. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21, 3207–3210 (2006).
Ndip, A. et al. Dialysis treatment is an independent risk factor for foot ulceration in patients with diabetes and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Care 33, 1811–1816 (2010).
Ndip, A. et al. High levels of foot ulceration and amputation risk in a multiracial cohort of diabetic patients on dialysis therapy. Diabetes Care 33, 878–880 (2010).
Reiber, G. E. et al. Causal pathways for incident lower extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care 22, 157–162 (1999).
Boulton, A. J. M. et al. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care 31, 1679–1685 (2008).
Krishnan, S., Nash, F., Baker, N., Fowler, D. & Rayman, G. Reduction in diabetic amputations over eleven years in a defined UK population: benefits of multi-disciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care 31, 99–101 (2008).
Kuehn, B. M. Prompt response, multi-disciplinary care: key to reducing diabetic foot amputation. JAMA 308, 19–20 (2012).
Cao, P. et al. Chapter II: Diagnostic methods. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 42 (Suppl. 2), S13–S32 (2011).
Carter, S. A. & Tate, R. B. The relationship of the transcutaneous oxygen tension, pulse waves and systolic pressures to the risk for limb amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease and skin ulcers or gangrene. Int. Angiol. 25, 67–72 (2006).
Collins, R. et al. Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. BMJ 334, 1257 (2007).
Met, R., Bipat, S., Legemate, D. A., Reekers, J. A. & Koelemay, M. J. W. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301, 415–424 (2009).
Diehm, N. et al. Chapter III: Management of cardiovascular risk factors and medical therapy. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 42 (Suppl. 2), S33–S42 (2011).
Ruffolo, A. A. J., Romano, M. & Ciapponi, A. Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006544.pub2.
Brock, F. E. et al. Iloprost in the treatment of ischemic tissue lesions in diabetics. Results of a placebo-controlled multicenter study with a stable prostacyclin derivative. Schweiz. Med. Wochenschr. 120, 1477–1482 (1990).
Altstaedt, H. O. et al. Treatment of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease Fontaine stage IV with intravenous iloprost and PGE1: a randomized open controlled study. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 49, 573–578 (1993).
Stiegler, H. et al. Placebo controlled, double-blind study of the effectiveness of i.v. prostaglandin E1 in diabetic patients with stage IV arterial occlusive disease [German]. Vasa. Suppl. 35, 164–166 (1992).
Bakker, K. et al. Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 28, 225–231 (2011).
Marston, W. A. et al. Natural history of limbs with arterial insufficiency and chronic ulceration treated without revascularization. J. Vasc. Surg. 44, 108–114 (2006).
Lepäntalo, M. & Mätzke, S. Outcome of unreconstructed chronic critical leg ischaemia. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 11, 153–157 (1996).
Benoit, E., O'Donnell, T. F., Kitsios, G. D. & Iafrati, M. D. Improved amputation-free survival in unreconstructable critical limb ischemia and its implications for clinical trial design and quality measurement. J. Vasc. Surg. 55, 781–789 (2012).
Faglia, E. et al. Early and five-year amputation and survival rate of diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: data of a cohort study of 564 patients. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 32, 484–490 (2006).
Baldwin, Z. K. et al. Limb salvage after infrainguinal bypass graft failure. J. Vasc. Surg. 39, 951–957 (2004).
Dick, F. et al. Surgical or endovascular revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia: influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome. J. Vasc. Surg. 45, 751–761 (2007).
Kalish, J. & Hamdan, A. Management of diabetic foot problems. J. Vasc. Surg. 51, 476–486 (2010).
Wu, R. et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Vasc. Surg. 59, 1711–1720 (2014).
Bekken, J. A., Jongsma, H., de Vries, J. P. & Fioole, B. Self-expanding stents and aortoiliac occlusive disease: a review of the literature. Med. Devices 7, 99–105 (2014).
Albers, M., Romiti, M., Brochado-Neto, F. C., De Luccia, N. & Pereira, C. A. B. Meta-analysis of popliteal-to-distal vein bypass grafts for critical ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 43, 498–503 (2006).
Skrepnek, G. H., Armstrong, D. G. & Mills, J. L. Open bypass and endovascular procedures among diabetic foot ulcer cases in the United States from 2001 to 2010. J. Vasc. Surg. 60, 1255–1264 (2014).
Adam, D. J. et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366, 1925–1934 (2005).
Bosanquet, D. C., Glasbey, J. C., Williams, I. M. & Twine, C. P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of direct versus indirect angiosomal revascularisation of infrapopliteal arteries. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 48, 88–97 (2014).
Iida, O. et al. Long-term results of direct and indirect endovascular revascularization based on the angiosome concept in patients with critical limb ischemia presenting with isolated below-the-knee lesions. J. Vasc. Surg. 55, 363–370 (2012).
Söderström, M. et al. Angiosome-targeted infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J. Vasc. Surg. 57, 427–435 (2013).
Sumpio, B. E. et al. Clinical implications of the angiosome model in peripheral vascular disease. J. Vasc. Surg. 58, 814–826 (2013).
Neville, R. F. & Sidawy, A. N. Surgical bypass: when is it best and do angiosomes play a role? Semin. Vasc. Surg. 25, 102–107 (2012).
Hinchliffe, R. & Andros, G. A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 28 (Suppl. 1), 179–217 (2012).
Söderström, M., Arvela, E., Albäck, A., Aho, P. S. & Lepäntalo, M. Healing of ischaemic tissue lesions after infrainguinal bypass surgery for critical leg ischaemia. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 36, 90–95 (2008).
University of Birmingham BASIL-2 Trial [online], (2015).
Pitei, D. L., Foster, A. & Edmonds, M. The effect of regular callus removal on foot pressures. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 38, 251–255 (1999).
Armstrong, D. G. et al. Evaluation of removable and irremovable cast walkers in the healing of diabetic foot wounds: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Care 28, 551–554 (2005).
Bus, S. A., Haspels, R. & Busch-Westbroek, T. E. Evaluation and optimisation of therapeutic footwear for neuropathic diabetic foot patients using in-shoe plantar pressure analysis. Diabetes Care 34, 1595–1600 (2011).
Katz, I. A. et al. A randomised controlled trial of two irremovable off-loading devices in the management of plantar neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care 28, 555–559 (2005).
Armstrong, D. G. et al. Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes Care 26, 2595–2597 (2003).
Dumville, J. C., Deschpande, S., O'Meara, S. & Speak, K. Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 8. Art. No.: CD009099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009099.pub3.
Jude, E. B., Apelqvist, J., Spraul, M. & Martini, J. Silver dressing study group. Prospective randomised controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressing in non-ischameic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetic Med. 24, 280–288 (2007).
Jeffcoate, W. J. et al. Randomised controlled trial of the use of three dressing preparations in the management of chronic ulceration of the foot in diabetes. Health Technol. Assess. 13, 1–86 (2009).
Saxena, V. et al. Vacuum assisted closure: microdeformations of wound and cell proliferation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 114, 1086–1098 (2004).
Armstrong, D. G. & Lavery, L. A. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366, 1704–1710 (2005).
Krug, E. et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury 42 (Suppl. 1), S1–S12 (2011).
Werner, S. & Grose, R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol. Rev. 83, 835–870 (2003).
Henshaw, F. R., Boughton, P., Lo, L., McLennan, S. V. & Twigg, S. M. Topically applied connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 improves diabetic preclinical cutaneous wound healing: potential role for CTGF in human diabetic foot ulcer healing. J. Diabetes Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/236238.
Pappanas, N. & Maltosze, E. Becaplermin is form recombinant platelet-derived growth factor available as an ointment and has shown some benefit. Clin.Interv.Aging 3, 233–240 (2008).
Dignani, M. C. et al. Treatment of neutropenia-related fungal infections with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-elicited white blood cell transfusions: a pilot study. Leukemia 11, 1621–1630 (1997).
Cruciani, M., Lipsky, B. A., Mengoli, C. & de Lalla, F. Are granulocyte colony-stimulating factors beneficial in treating diabetic foot infections? A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 28, 454–460 (2005).
Choi, J. S., Kim, J. D., Yoon, H. S. & Cho, Y. W. Full-thickness skin wound healing using human placenta-derived extracellular matrix containing bioactive molecules. Tissue Eng. Part A 19, 329–339 (2013).
Antoline, C., Kramer, A. & Roth, M. Implementation and methodology of a multidisciplinary disease-state-management program for comprehensive diabetes care. Permanenta J. 15, 43–48 (2011).
Krishnan, S., Nash, F., Baker, N., Fowler, D. & Rayman, G. Reduction in diabetic amputations over eleven years in a defined UK population: benefits of multi-disciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care 31, 99–101 (2008).
Rayman, G. et al. The Ipswich Touch Test: a simple and novel method to identify inpatients with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Care 34, 1517–1518 (2011).
Bowling, F. L. et al. A pocket-sized disposable device for testing the integrity of sensation in the outpatient setting. Diabetic Med. 29, 1550–1552 (2012).
Papanas, N. et al. Neuropad: A simple new non-invasive sweat indicator test for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetic Med. 30, 525–534 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to researching the data for the article, discussion of content, writing the article and reviewing and/or editing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowling, F., Rashid, S. & Boulton, A. Preventing and treating foot complications associated with diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11, 606–616 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.130
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.130
This article is cited by
-
Semmes Weinstein monofilament test for detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: sensitivity and specificity
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery (2024)
-
LNP-RNA-engineered adipose stem cells for accelerated diabetic wound healing
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Risk Factors for Major Lower Limb Amputation and Effect of Endovascular Revascularization in Patients with Diabetic Foot Wound
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (2024)
-
Advanced polymer hydrogels that promote diabetic ulcer healing: mechanisms, classifications, and medical applications
Biomaterials Research (2023)
-
White noise insole: an artificial evoked sensation device that can be expected to improve plantar sensation of diabetic foot
Scientific Reports (2023)