Perspectives

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 6, 437-442 (June 2007) | doi:10.1038/nrd2307

OpinionThe FDA's assessment of follow-on protein products: a historical perspective

Janet Woodcock1  About the author, Joseph Griffin1, Rachel Behrman1, Barry Cherney1, Terrie Crescenzi1, Blair Fraser1, Dena Hixon1, Christopher Joneckis1, Steven Kozlowski1, Amy Rosenberg1, Lewis Schrager1, Emily Shacter1, Robert Temple1, Keith Webber1 & Helen Winkle1

Top

The scientific and regulatory issues that are associated with the possible introduction of 'follow-on' versions of protein drug products are the topic of considerable debate at present. Because of the differences between protein drug products and small-molecule drugs, the development of follow-on versions of protein products presents more complex scientific challenges than those presented by the development of generic versions of small-molecule drugs. Here, with a view to illustrating the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) scientific reasoning and experience in this area, we discuss past examples of the FDA's actions involving the evaluation of various types of follow-on and second-generation protein products and within-product manufacturing changes. The FDA believes its evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of follow-on protein products will evolve as scientific and technological advances in product characterization and manufacturing continue to reduce some of the complexity and uncertainty that are inherent in the manufacturing of protein products.

Author affiliations

  1. The authors are all part of the working group on follow-on proteins at the Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA.

Correspondence to: Email: janet.woodcock@fda.hhs.gov

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

Extra navigation

naturejobs

Advertisement