Perspective

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 5, 730-739 (September 2006) | doi:10.1038/nrd2082

There is a Corrigendum (1 March 2007) associated with this article.

OpinionDrug–target residence time and its implications for lead optimization

Robert A. Copeland1, David L. Pompliano2 & Thomas D. Meek3  About the authors

Top

Much of drug discovery today is predicated on the concept of selective targeting of particular bioactive macromolecules by low-molecular-mass drugs. The binding of drugs to their macromolecular targets is therefore seen as paramount for pharmacological activity. In vitro assessment of drug–target interactions is classically quantified in terms of binding parameters such as IC50 or K d. This article presents an alternative perspective on drug optimization in terms of drug–target binary complex residence time, as quantified by the dissociative half-life of the drug–target binary complex. We describe the potential advantages of long residence time in terms of duration of pharmacological effect and target selectivity.

Author affiliations

  1. Robert A. Copeland is in the Department of Enzymology and Mechanistic Pharmacology, at GlaxoSmithKline, UP1345, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.
  2. David L. Pompliano is in MMPD Biology, at GlaxoSmithKline, UP1345, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.
  3. Thomas D. Meek is in Assay Development, at GlaxoSmithKline, UP1345, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.

Correspondence to: Robert A. Copeland1 Email: Robert.A.Copeland@gsk.com

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Peptide partners call the tune

Nature News and Views (15 Sep 1994)

Biophysics May the force be with you

Nature News and Views (07 Jan 1999)

See all 5 matches for News And Views

Extra navigation

Search PubMed for

naturejobs

natureproducts


Advertisement