Abstract
The use of animals in research and development has remained a subject of public debate for over a century. Although there is good evidence from opinion surveys that the public accepts the use of animals in research, they are poorly informed about the way in which it is regulated, and are increasingly concerned about laboratory-animal welfare. This article will review how public concerns about animal experimentation developed, the recent activities of animal-rights groups, and the opportunities and challenges facing the scientific community.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
French, R. D. Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1975).
Lederer, S. E. in Vivisection in Historical Perspective (ed. Rupke, N. A.) 236–258 (Croon Helm Ltd, Beckenham, Kent, 1987).
Regan, T. The Case for Animal Rights (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1983).
Matfield, M. The ALF: terrorist attacks on medical research. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 23, 31–35 (1996).
Matfield, M. Addressing the two basic questions — is it necessary and is it cruel? Res. Def. Soc. News 8–9 (April 1996).
Coghlan, A., Copley, J. & Aldhous, P. Let the people speak. New Scientist 26–31 (22 May 1999).
Davies, B. In-depth survey of public attitudes shows surprising degree of acceptance. Res. Def. Soc. News 8–11 (April 2000).
Davies, B. Hillgrove farm closes down. Res. Def. Soc. News 1 (October 1999).
Anon. Lessons from Huntingdon. Nature 409, 439 (2001).
Davies, B. Government gets tough on animal rights extremism. Res. Def. Soc. News 1–3 (April 2001).
Anon. Animal-lab director injured in attack. Nature 410, 8 (2001).
Morrison, A. R. in Animal Research and Human Health: Advancing Human Welfare Through Behavioral Science (eds Carroll, M. E. & Jovermier, J. B.) 361–384 (American Psychological Association, Washington, 2001).
Guillermo, K. S. Monkey Business: the Disturbing Case that Launched the Animal Rights Movement (National Press Books, Washington, 1993).
Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Miltner, W. H. R., Taub, E. & Weiller, C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31, 1210–1216 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Related links
Related links
FURTHER INFORMATION
The American Physiological Society
American Psychological Society
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Americans for Medical Progress
Animals in Medicines Research Information Centre
Association of Medical Research Charities
Biomedical Research Education Trust
Foundation for Biomedical Research
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matfield, M. Animal experimentation: the continuing debate. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1, 149–152 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd727
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd727
