Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 3 Issue 9, September 2006

Editorial

Top of page ⤴

Viewpoint

  • Evidence gained in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is considered superior to that gained from associated epidemiological studies, but both types of study can be prone to error. Issues such as reproducibility, recall bias and duration are important factors that contribute to these errors, as discussed in this Viewpoint.

    • Gad Rennert
    Viewpoint
Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

Top of page ⤴

Practice Point

Top of page ⤴

Review Article

  • The importance of positive N2 lymph node staging for prognosis and treatment decisions is now recognized for patients with Pancoast tumors. The authors of this review assert that a multi-disciplinary management strategy is needed for these patients, and that survival advantages have been observed using combined and multimodality regimens. The role of surgery in the context of viable treatment options and the use of imaging for assessing treatment response is critically discussed.

    • Samir Narayan
    • Charles R Thomas Jr
    Review Article
  • Sedation is used in multiple settings in palliative care, such as transient controlled sedation, respite sedation, and sedation for refractory psychological or existential suffering; however, it is a controversial technique that can diminish the capacity of the patient to interact, function, and, in some cases, to live. Cherny provides a comprehensive account of the risks associated with different sedation approaches and also highlights the controversies and ethical considerations for palliative care medicine.

    • Nathan I Cherny
    Review Article
  • Advances in the fields of genetics and gene-expression profiling and the advent of microarray technology have revolutionized the concept of patient tailored treatment. Before microarrays qualify as a useful clinical tool, however, they must demonstrate reliability and reproducibility. Limitations of microarray technology include sample acquisition and methods of biostatistical analysis required to analyze the enormous quantities of data obtained. Abdullah-Sayaniet al.overview the current status of microarray technology in clinical practice and propose how advances in this technology will help eliminate some of these limitations and improve patient management.

    • Ambreen Abdullah-Sayani
    • Jolien M Bueno-de-Mesquita
    • Marc J van de Vijver
    Review Article
Top of page ⤴

Case Study

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links