Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Therapy Insight: potential of statins for cancer chemoprevention and therapy

Nature Clinical Practice Oncology volume 2, pages 82–89 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, also known as statins, are commonly prescribed medications that lower serum cholesterol and decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality. These agents inhibit the rate-limiting step of the mevalonate pathway, an effect that influences cholesterol homeostasis and other diverse cellular functions. Preclinical data suggest statins have pleiotropic antineoplastic effects in a variety of tumors, but clinical studies have provided conflicting data regarding whether statins may increase or decrease the risk of cancer. Abnormal cholesterol metabolism in cancer is poorly understood but should be considered when evaluating the antineoplastic effects of statins. Emerging evidence suggests that atherosclerosis and cancer have similar underlying molecular mechanisms, both having lipid abnormalities and a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Like nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, statins target lipid metabolism, have significant anti-inflammatory effects, and can influence cardiovascular mortality. Recent studies show that statins may have chemopreventive effects and may complement cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiotherapy as a biologic response modifier in established cancer, but current data do not support their use as monotherapy. The preclinical data supporting anticancer activity, their additional health benefits, and the safety and relative low cost of statins compared to other 'targeted' agents currently under development all favor conducting prospective clinical trials of these drugs in cancer chemoprevention and therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts AW et al. (1980) Mevinolin: a highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 3957–3961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Downs JR et al. (2001) Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS): additional perspectives on tolerability of long-term treatment with lovastatin. Am J Cardiol 87: 1074–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360: 7–22

  4. The LIPID Study Group (Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease) (2002) Long-term effectiveness and safety of pravastatin in 9014 patients with coronary heart disease and average cholesterol concentrations: the LIPID trial follow-up. Lancet 359: 1379–1387

  5. Sacks FM et al. (1996) The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 335: 1001–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shepherd J et al. (1995) Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 333: 1301–1307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Strandberg TE et al. (2004) Mortality and incidence of cancer during 10-year follow-up of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 364: 771–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hebert PR et al. (1997) Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials. JAMA 278: 313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Law MR et al. (2003) Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 326: 1423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bjerre LM and LeLorier J (2001) Do statins cause cancer? A meta-analysis of large randomized clinical trials. Am J Med 110: 716–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeffer MA et al. (2002) Safety and tolerability of pravastatin in long-term clinical trials: prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project. Circulation 105: 2341–2346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boudreau DM et al. (2004) The association of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitor use and breast carcinoma risk in postmenopausal women: a case-control study. Cancer 100: 2038–2316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graaf MR et al. (2004) The risk of cancer in users of statins. J Clin Oncol 22: 2388–2394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Poynter JN et al. (2004) HMG CoA reductase inhibitors and the risk of colorectal cancer. [abstract] Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22 (Suppl): S1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown MS and Goldstein JL (1980) Multivalent feedback regulation of HMG CoA reductase, a control mechanism coordinating isoprenoid synthesis and cell growth. J Lipid Res 21: 505–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein JL and Brown MS (1990) Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343: 425–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan KK et al. (2003) The statins as anticancer agents. Clin Cancer Res 9: 10–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liao JK and Laufs U (2005) Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45: 89–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wong WW et al. (2002) HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the malignant cell: the statin family of drugs as triggers of tumor-specific apoptosis. Leukemia 16: 508–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Splichal JE et al. (2003) The statins: multifunctional antithrombotic and antineoplastic drugs. Semin Thromb Hemost 29: 259–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jakobisiak M and Golab J (2003) Potential antitumor effects of statins (review). Int J Oncol 23: 1055–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weis M et al. (2002) Statins have biphasic effects on angiogenesis. Circulation 105: 739–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Urbich C et al. (2002) Double-edged role of statins in angiogenesis signaling. Circ Res 90: 737–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sata M et al. (2004) Statins augment collateral growth in response to ischemia but they do not promote cancer and atherosclerosis. Hypertension 43: 1214–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Newman TB and Hulley SB (1996) Carcinogenicity of lipid-lowering drugs. JAMA 275: 55–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ederer F et al. (1971) Cancer among men on cholesterol-lowering diets. Lancet 2: 203–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coogan PF et al. (2002) Statin use and the risk of breast and prostate cancer. Epidemiology 13: 262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barclay M et al. (1955) Human plasma lipoproteins, I. In normal women and in women with advanced carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 8: 253–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho YK et al. (1978) Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity in human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood 52: 1099–1114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kritz H et al. (1996) Low cholesterol and cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 3043–3048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaye JA and Jick H (2004) Statin use and cancer risk in the General Practice Research Database. Br J Cancer 90: 635–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharp SJ and Pocock SJ (1997) Time trends in serum cholesterol before cancer death. Epidemiology 8: 132–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Libby P (2002) Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 420: 868–874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ridker PM et al. (1997) Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 336: 973–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ridker PM et al. (1998) Inflammation, pravastatin, and the risk of coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Circulation 98: 839–844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Steinberg D (2002) Atherogenesis in perspective: hypercholesterolemia and inflammation as partners in crime. Nat Med 8: 1211–1217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Coussens LM and Werb Z (2002) Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420: 860–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McMillan DC et al. (2001) Measurement of the systemic inflammatory response predicts cancer-specific and non-cancer survival in patients with cancer. Nutr Cancer 41: 64–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ross JS et al. (2001) Atherosclerosis and cancer: common molecular pathways of disease development and progression. Ann N Y Acad Sci 947: 271–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Thun MJ et al. (2002) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as anticancer agents: mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical issues. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 252–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Olsen JH et al. (1999) Lipid-lowering medications and risk of cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 52: 167–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Blais L et al. (2000) 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and the risk of cancer: a nested case-control study. Arch Intern Med 160: 2363–2368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Beck P et al. (2003) Statin use and risk of breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56: 280–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cauley JA et al. (2003) Lipid-lowering drug use and breast cancer in older women: a prospective study. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 12: 749–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Holly EA et al. (1999) Case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among women and heterosexual men in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. Am J Epidemiol 150: 375–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang Y et al. (2004) Prior medical conditions and medication use and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Connecticut United States women. Cancer Causes Control 15: 419–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Holly EA and Bracci PM (2003) Population-based study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, histology, and medical history among human immunodeficiency virus-negative participants in San Francisco. Am J Epidemiol 158: 316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Thibault A et al. (1996) Phase I study of lovastatin, an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2: 483–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim WS et al. (2001) Phase II study of high-dose lovastatin in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs 19: 81–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lopez-Aguilar E et al. (1999) Security and maximal tolerated doses of fluvastatin in pediatric cancer patients. Arch Med Res 30: 128–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Katz M et al. (2003) Statin use is associated with improved biochemical outcome after high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer. [abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57: S271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Katz MS et al. Association of statin use with a pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, in press

  53. Kawata S et al. (2001) Effect of pravastatin on survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A randomized controlled trial. Br J Cancer 84: 886–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Larner J et al. (1998) A phase I-II trial of lovastatin for anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Clin Oncol 21: 579–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Jain RK (1994) Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. Sci Am 271: 58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Folkman J (1995) Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med 1: 27–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Almog Y et al. (2004) Prior statin therapy is associated with a decreased rate of severe sepsis. Circulation 110: 880–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. del Real G et al. (2004) Statins inhibit HIV-1 infection by down-regulating Rho activity. J Exp Med 200: 541–547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Vaughan CJ (2003) Prevention of stroke and dementia with statins: effects beyond lipid lowering. Am J Cardiol 91: 23B–29B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Vollmer T et al. (2004) Oral simvastatin treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 363: 1607–1608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses gratitude to Drs Jay Loeffler, Guido Majno, and Michael Zelefsky for their support and valuable insight.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. courtesy Radiation Oncologist in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA

    Matthew S Katz

Authors
  1. Matthew S Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Glossary

AFCAPS/TEXCAPS

Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, M. Therapy Insight: potential of statins for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2, 82–89 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0097

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing