The DNA damage response in tumorigenesis and cancer treatment

Jiri Bartek and Jiri Lukas

The DNA damage response pathways can activate cell cycle checkpoints (which can involve p53) to arrest the cell either transiently or permanently (senescence) or they can activate specific DNA repair pathways in response to certain types of DNA damage. Some of the proteins in these pathways are mutated or non-functional in human tumours. This can cause cancer cells to be more reliant on an intact DNA repair pathway or survival, providing a therapeutic window. Inhibition of these intact pathways can selectively target tumour cells and the success of this strategy is illustrated by the progress of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in early phase clinical trials. This Poster highlights how the DNA damage response is thought to protect against tumour progression and the therapeutic rationale for specifically targeting members of the DNA damage response pathways. Some of the drugs that are under development or in clinical trials are also included.

Related content from Nature Reviews Cancer:

Reviews

Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease

Juan-Manuel Schvartzman, Rocio Sotillo & Robert Benezra

doi:10.1038/nrc2781

Nature Reviews Cancer 10, 102-115 (2010)

The inability to faithfully segregate chromosomes to two daughter cells during mitosis — leading to aneuploidy — is a widespread phenomenon in solid tumours that is thought to promote tumorigenic progression. This Review discusses how mitotic chromosomal instability might arise in tumours and what its consequences might be.

Metabolism and cancer: the circadian clock connection

Saurabh Sahar & Paolo Sassone-Corsi

doi:10.1038/nrc2747

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 886-896 (2009)

Evidence indicates that the disruption of the circadian clock might be directly linked to cancer. As described here, alterations in clock function could lead to aberrant cellular proliferation, DNA damage responses and altered metabolism.

p53 — a Jack of all trades but master of none

Melissa R. Junttila & Gerard I. Evan

doi:10.1038/nrc2728

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 821-829 (2009)

p53 is an evolutionarily ancient coordinator of metazoan stress responses and its role in tumour suppression is likely to be a relatively recent adaptation. This Review discusses how such evolutionary retooling of this venerable transcription factor entails compromises that restrict its efficacy as a tumour suppressor.

Tumour suppression by p53: a role for the DNA damage response?

David W. Meek

doi:10.1038/nrc2716

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 714-723 (2009)

How important is the DNA damage response in mobilizing the tumour suppression function of p53? This Review considers how supporting and conflicting evidence about the role of DNA damage response signalling in cancer can be reconciled.

RecQ helicases: multifunctional genome caretakers

Wai Kit Chu & Ian D. Hickson

doi:10.1038/nrc2682

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 644-654 (2009)

In recent years, there has been a tremendous advance in our understanding of the cellular functions of individual RecQ helicases. This Review discusses how these proteins might suppress genomic rearrangements, and therefore function as 'caretaker' tumour suppressors.

p21 in cancer: intricate networks and multiple activities

Tarek Abbas & Anindya Dutta

doi:10.1038/nrc2657

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 400-414 (2009)

p21 has a well-known role in mediating p53-induced growth arrest. However, this protein can affect many other cellular functions and is activated independently of p53. What are the p53-independent roles of p21 in cancer, and could p21 be a therapeutic target?

Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy

Kevin M. Prise & Joe M. O'Sullivan

doi:10.1038/nrc2603

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 351-360 (2009)

It has become clear that cell–cell signalling — known as the bystander effect — has an important role in responses to ionizing radiation. What do we know about this effect and how might it affect the response to radiotherapy?

Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy

John L. Nitiss

doi:10.1038/nrc2607

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 338-350 (2009)

The ability to interfere with topoisomerase II (TOP2) and generate enzyme-mediated DNA damage is an effective strategy for cancer chemotherapy. Can recent studies lead to refined targeting of TOP2 and an improved anticancer strategy?

DNA topoisomerase II and its growing repertoire of biological functions

John L. Nitiss

doi:10.1038/nrc2608

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 327-337 (2009)

The importance of targeting toposimerase II (TOP2) for the treatment of cancer is not a new concept; however, understanding of the biological functions of this enzyme has lagged behind the use of the drugs to target it. This Review discusses what we now know about the functions of TOP2.

Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Marcos Malumbres & Mariano Barbacid

doi:10.1038/nrc2602

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 153-166 (2009)

Misregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) can induce unscheduled proliferation and genomic and chromosomal instability. How has recent genetic evidence changed our understanding of the roles of CDKs in the cell cycle of normal and tumour cells?

Living on a break: cellular senescence as a DNA-damage response

Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna

doi:10.1038/nrc2440

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 512-522 (2008)

Cellular senescence is associated with ageing and cancer in vivo and has a proven tumour suppressive function. This Review discusses the evidence indicating that DNA damage and the engagement of the DNA-damage response pathways are common to both ageing and cancer.

Telomere dysfunction and tumour suppression: the senescence connection

Yibin Deng, Suzanne S. Chan & Sandy Chang

doi:10.1038/nrc2393

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 450-458 (2008)

Using recent evidence from mouse models, this Review discusses whether p53-dependent senescence induced by dysfunctional telomeres is as potent as apoptosis in suppressing tumorigenesis in vivo.

Hypoxia and metabolism: Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability

Robert G. Bristow & Richard P. Hill

doi:10.1038/nrc2344

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 180-192 (2008)

Intratumoural hypoxia is a negative prognostic indicator and can underlie therapeutic resistance for many patients. This Review explores the differential biological effects of acute hypoxia versus longer-term, chronic hypoxia on genomic instability and DNA damage repair pathways. What does this mean for therapeutic strategies?

DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy

Thomas Helleday, Eva Petermann, Cecilia Lundin, Ben Hodgson & Ricky A. Sharma

doi:10.1038/nrc2342

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 193-204 (2008)

Can we exploit the DNA repair pathways in cancer cells to increase the efficacy of existing and future cancer treatments? This Review discusses the current state of play.

Thiopurines in current medical practice: molecular mechanisms and contributions to therapy-related cancer

Peter Karran & Natalie Attard

doi:10.1038/nrc2292

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 24-36 (2008)

Thiopurines are effective anti-inflammatory, anticancer and immunosuppresive drugs. However, azathioprine is also a carcinogen. So, how do thiopurines exert their therapeutic and carcinogenic effects?

Perspectives

PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond

Michèle Rouleau, Anand Patel, Michael J. Hendzel, Scott H. Kaufmann & Guy G. Poirier

doi:10.1038/nrc2812

Nature Reviews Cancer 10, 293-301 (2010)

Recent findings have thrust poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) into the limelight as potential chemotherapeutic targets. What is known about the structures and functions of the family of PARP enzymes and which questions do we need answered to guide the rational development of PARP inhibitors as anticancer agents?

Caspase 2 in apoptosis, the DNA damage response and tumour suppression: enigma no more?

Sharad Kumar

doi:10.1038/nrc2745

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 897-903 (2009)

Recent evidence suggests that caspase 2 may have multiple roles in the response to DNA damage, cell cycle regulation and tumour suppression. These findings are unexpected and have important implications for our understanding of tumorigenesis and the treatment of cancer.

Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation

Leon Mullenders, Mike Atkinson, Herwig Paretzke, Laure Sabatier & Simon Bouffler

doi:10.1038/nrc2677

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 596-604 (2009)

A major challenge exists in assessing the risk of developing cancer from exposures to low-dose radiation — which are encountered during diagnostic scans, for example. What factors influence low-dose cancer risk and what might this mean for current protection measures?

Palindromic gene amplification — an evolutionarily conserved role for DNA inverted repeats in the genome

Hisashi Tanaka & Meng-Chao Yao

doi:10.1038/nrc2591

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 216-224 (2009)

Gene amplification is an essential process in several organisms including the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. What can amplification in this model system teach us about mechanisms of amplification in cancer cells?

Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype

Gillian C. Barnett, Catherine M. L. West, Alison M. Dunning, Rebecca M. Elliott, Charlotte E. Coles, Paul D. P. Pharoah & Neil G. Burnet

doi:10.1038/nrc2587

Nature Reviews Cancer 9, 134-142 (2009)

Variation in sensitivity to radiation is an inherited genetic trait. This Perspective explores the possibility of genome-wide association studies to characterize genetic profiles that predict patient response to radiotherapy.

γH2AX and cancer

William M. Bonner, Christophe E. Redon, Jennifer S. Dickey, Asako J. Nakamura, Olga A. Sedelnikova, Stéphanie Solier & Yves Pommier

doi:10.1038/nrc2523

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 957-967 (2008)

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) may lead to cancer but, paradoxically, are also used to kill cancer cells. How might γH2AX — a surrogate marker of DSBs — be used to detect precancerous cells, to stage cancers, to monitor the effectiveness of cancer therapies and to develop novel anticancer drugs?

Replication licensing and cancer — a fatal entanglement?

J. Julian Blow & Peter J. Gillespie

doi:10.1038/nrc2500

Nature Reviews Cancer 8, 799-806 (2008)

Replication licensing proteins are inappropriately expressed and misregulated in a wide variety of cancers. What are the consequences for DNA replication and genomic stability?