Protocol


Nature Protocols 2, 259 - 262 (2007)
Published online: 22 February 2007 | doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.26

Subject Categories: Isolation, purification and separation | Model organisms | Cell and developmental biology | Plant biology

Isolation of intact vacuoles from Arabidopsis rosette leaf–derived protoplasts

Stéphanie Robert1, Jan Zouhar1,2, Clay Carter1,3 & Natasha Raikhel1

Vacuoles are very prominent compartments within plant cells, and understanding of their function relies on knowledge of their content. Here, we present a simple vacuole purification protocol that was successfully used for large-scale isolation of vacuoles, free of significant contamination from other endomembrane compartments. This method is based on osmotic and thermal disruption of mesophyl-derived Arabidopsis protoplasts, followed by a density gradient fractionation of the cellular content. The whole procedure, including protoplast isolation, takes approximately 6 h.

Top

Introduction

Large-scale isolation and characterization of cellular organelles offers excellent opportunities in plant systems biology1. Detailed qualitative and quantitative knowledge of the composition of a particular organelle allows for investigation of subcellular pathways through the identification of novel protein components and the analysis of cellular sinks. This also facilitates detailed comparative studies between species or between mutant and wild-type plants. In contrast to some organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts, that are relatively easy to obtain in a pure form2, 3, plant vacuoles are extremely fragile, and their isolation using conventional tissue homogenization and fractionation schemes can be remarkably challenging and often results in a subcellular fraction without the same properties as intact mature vacuoles4. The first successful technique to overcome these difficulties was based on protoplast isolation and subsequent gentle release of vacuoles by osmotic shock5, 6. Later large-scale isolation protocols employed gradient fractionation of osmotically released organelles7, 8, and the method was further optimized by application of both osmotic and thermal shocks to the isolated protoplasts9, 10. As an alternative to the protoplast methods, which are applicable only to relatively soft tissues, vacuoles can be isolated by slicing the plant material and releasing contents into a medium with a perfectly adjusted osmoticum11. In subsequent studies, numerous vacuolar constituents have been determined, including sugars and amino acids12, hydrolases13 and ions14.

The increasing impact of proteomic studies on plant biology15, 16 has triggered renewed interest in organelle purification and led to two independent proteomic studies focused on intact vacuoles derived from different plant tissues17, 18. In contrast to a relatively intricate protocol describing intact vacuole purification from an Arabidopsis cell suspension18, we present a simple, reliable method for vacuole isolation from Arabidopsis leaf mesophyl protoplasts in great detail17. This protocol is based on one-step Ficoll gradient fractionation of osmotically and thermally lysed protoplasts under simple chemical conditions. This method has been used successfully in our laboratory for biochemical characterization of vacuolar contents using both proteomics and immunological approaches. The focus of this protocol on vegetative tissues has allowed for comparative studies of a mutant plant line that was affected in terms of vacuolar protein processing and degradation19. Therefore, this protocol provides an exceptional opportunity for comparative studies between multiple plant lines without generation of stable cell suspension cultures.

Procedural comments

This protocol is designed to be performed within 1 d. It consists of two steps, which include the isolation of the protoplast followed by a gradient fractionation. The buffers should be made fresh, and the plant tissues cannot be frozen. It is recommended that the experimenter wear gloves during the whole procedure.


Top

Materials

Reagents

Equipment

Reagent setup

  • 0.5 M EDTA Dissolve 74.45 g EDTA in 300 ml Milli-Q water. Adjust pH to 8 with solid NaOH. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 400 ml.
  • 30% (wt/vol) Ficoll Dissolve 4.5 g Ficoll in Milli-Q water to a total volume of 15 ml. Heat the solution carefully for several minutes in a 65 °C water bath and vortex until completely dissolved. The Ficoll solution can be prepared 1 d ahead.
    Critical The 30% Ficoll solution should not be exposed to excessive heat. Ficoll is difficult to dissolve, but heat the solution for a short time without boiling it.
  • 1 M mannitol Dissolve 72.87 g mannitol in 400 ml Milli-Q water.
  • 50 mM MES, pH 5.6 Dissolve 1.07 g MES in 80 ml Milli-Q water. Adjust pH to 5.6 with 1 M KOH. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 100 ml.
  • 0.1% Neutral Red solution Mix 0.1 g Neutral Red, 200 mul 1% acetic acid and 50 mul chloroform. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 100 ml.
  • 0.2 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.5 Mix 16 ml solution A (27.6 g NaH2PO4dotH2O per liter; 0.2 M) and 84 ml solution B (53.65 g Na2HPO4dot7H2O per liter; 0.2 M).
  • 0.2 M sodium phosphate, pH 8.0 Mix 5.3 ml solution A (27.6 g NaH2PO4dotH2O per liter; 0.2 M) and 94.7 ml solution B (53.65 g Na2HPO4dot7H2O per liter; 0.2 M).
  • Lysis buffer Mix 3 ml 1 M mannitol, 5 ml 30% Ficoll, 300 mul EDTA pH 8.0, 375 mul 0.2 M sodium phosphate pH 8.0 and 75 mul Neutral Red20. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 15 ml. Keep at 37 °C.
  • Vacuole buffer Mix 4.5 ml 1 M mannitol, 250 mul 0.2 M sodium phosphate pH 7.5 and 40 mul 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 10 ml. Keep on ice.
  • 4% Ficoll solution Mix 4.5 ml vacuole buffer and 3 ml lysis buffer. Keep at room temperature (approx25 °C).
  • Wash buffer Mix 60 ml 1 M mannitol and 30 ml 50 mM MES pH 5.6. Add Milli-Q water until the total volume is 150 ml.
  • Protoplast enzyme solution Dissolve 0.3 g cellulase, 0.3 g macerozyme, 0.12 g CaCl2dot2H2O in 30 ml wash buffer. Keep at 37 °C with occasional vortexing until the enzymes are completely dissolved. Add 10.5 mul beta-mercaptoethanol.
    Caution beta-Mercaptoethanol is toxic and dangerous for the environment. Handle using appropriate safety equipment and measures. Cellulase and macerozyme are harmful.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top

Procedure

  1. Plant materialRemove rosette leaves from 35-day-old Arabidopsis plants. The plants should be grown under short-day conditions (8 h light) at 18 °C in small pots, one plant per pot.Troubleshooting
  2. Protoplast isolationCollect no more than 2 g rosette leaf tissue.
  3. Cut the leaves into 2 mm strips using a razor blade.
  4. Place the processed leaves and 30 ml protoplast enzyme solution into a 250-ml Kimax flask with side arm and apply vacuum for 10 min.
    Caution beta-Mercaptoethanol is toxic and dangerous for the environment. Cellulase and macerozyme are harmful.
  5. Cover the flask openings with Parafilm and incubate the tissues with the protoplast enzyme solution for 4 h on a benchtop open air Excella shaker model E1 in the dark. Shake at 70 r.p.m.
  6. Wash the protoplasts by straining through a Cellector Tissue Sieve Thermo EC into a 150-ml Pyrex brand fleaker beaker (150 mesh). Rinse the Cellector Tissue Sieve Thermo EC gently with 5 ml wash buffer.
  7. Transfer the protoplasts carefully into a 50-ml BD Falcon centrifuge tube.
  8. Rinse the fleaker with an additional 5 ml wash buffer.
  9. Spin down the protoplasts in an Allegra 6 benchtop centrifuge at 80g at 20 °C for 20 min.
  10. Remove and discard the supernatant using a Falcon disposable polystyrene serological pipette.
  11. Gently re-suspend the pellet in approximately 30 ml wash buffer.
  12. Spin (as described in Step 9) and wash once more with wash buffer to remove protoplasting enzymes.
  13. Check the isolated protoplasts under the light microscope. You may wish to keep some unlysed protoplasts for comparative/enrichment analysis. Proceed with the remainder as described below.
  14. Vacuole isolationAdd 10.5 ml pre-warmed lysis buffer to the protoplasts using a Falcon disposable polystyrene serological pipette.
  15. Re-suspend well, yet gently, by pipetting 5–8 times up and down using a 5-ml Pyrex reusable wide-tip serological pipette.
  16. Wait for 2 min.
  17. Inspect the protoplast disruption and the vacuole release under the light microscope (Fig. 1).
    Figure 1: Micrographs of lysed protoplasts and purified vacuoles.
    Figure 1 : Micrographs of lysed protoplasts and purified vacuoles.

    (a) Bright-field micrograph of osmotically/thermally lysed protoplast, Step 17. Arrows: lysed protoplasts; arrowheads: released plastids; asterisks: released vacuoles. (b) Bright-field micrograph of purified vacuoles, Step 23. Scale bar = 50 mum.

    Full size image (26 KB)

  18. Transfer 5 ml of the solution into an ultra-clear centrifugation tube (two tubes per sample) using a 5 ml Pyrex reusable wide-tip serological pipette.
  19. Overlay with 3 ml 4% Ficoll solution using a 10 ml Falcon disposable polystyrene serological pipette.
    Critical step The layering of the gradient has to be done very carefully but quickly; try to avoid mixing the consecutive layers.
  20. Layer 1 ml ice-cold vacuole buffer on the top of the gradient.
    Critical step The layering of the gradient has to be done very carefully but quickly; try to avoid mixing the consecutive layers.
  21. Spin for 50 min at 71,000g at 10 °C in an Optima L-90K ultra-centrifuge using slow acceleration and slow deceleration settings.
  22. Vacuoles should be visible as a pink layer on the interface between 0 and 4% Ficoll. Remove them carefully using a pipette.Troubleshooting
  23. Check the vacuoles for purity under the light microscope (Fig. 1).Troubleshooting
Top

Timing

Vacuole isolation can be performed in approximately 6 h.

Top

Troubleshooting

Troubleshooting advice can be found in Table 1.


Top

Anticipated results

The typical amount of protein found in the final vacuolar sample is 50 mug. The purity of the vacuole fraction extracted according to this protocol has been studied and discussed extensively17, 19, 21. The presence of different markers of the endomembrane system and other organelles in the vacuolar fraction has been examined using immunoblot analysis. The vacuolar markers AtALEU, gamma-TIP and SYP22 were enriched in the vacuolar fractions, but AtVPS45 (TGN), SYP21 (PVC), AtSEC12 (ER) and Hsp93 (chloroplasts) were not present at a detectable level in the vacuolar fractions, indicating that the fractions were not contaminated with these organelles.



Top

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Energy Biosciences (Grant DE-FG02-02ER15295 to N.R.).

Competing interests statement: 

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Top

References

  1. Girke, T., Ozkan, M., Carter, D. & Raikhel, N.V. Towards a modeling infrastructure for studying plant cells. Plant Physiol. 132, 410–414 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  2. Millar, A.H., Sweetlove, L.J., Giege, P. & Leaver, C.J. Analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome. Plant Physiol. 127, 1711–1727 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  3. Fitzpatrick, L.M. & Keegstra, K. A method for isolating a high yield of Arabidopsis chloroplasts capable of efficient import of precursor proteins. Plant J. 27, 59–65 (2001). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Matile, P. & Wiemken, A. Vacuoles and spherosomes. Methods Enzymol. 31, 572–578 (1974). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  5. Cocking, E.C. A method for the isolation of plant protoplasts and vacuoles. Nature 187, 962–963 (1960). | Article | ISI |
  6. Strobel, G.A. & Hess, W.M. Evidence for the presence of the toxin-binding protein on the plasma membrane of sugarcane cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 1413–1417 (1974). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  7. Wagner, G.J. & Siegelman, H.W. Large-scale isolation of intact vacuoles and isolation of chloroplasts from protoplasts of mature plant-tissues. Science 190, 1298–1299 (1975).
  8. Boller, T. & Kende, H. Hydrolytic enzymes in the central vacuole of plant-cells. Plant Physiol. 63, 1123–1132 (1979). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  9. Sonnewald, U., Brauer, M., von Schaewen, A., Stitt, M. & Willmitzer, L. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing yeast-derived invertase in either the cytosol, vacuole or apoplast: a powerful tool for studying sucrose metabolism and sink/source interactions. Plant J. 1, 95–106 (1991). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Gomez, L. & Chrispeels, M.J. Tonoplast and soluble vacuolar proteins are targeted by different mechanisms. Plant Cell 5, 1113–1124 (1993). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  11. Leigh, R.A. & Branton, D. Isolation of vacuoles from root storage tissue of Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 58, 656–662 (1976). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  12. Wagner, G.J. Content and vacuole/extravacuole distribution of neutral sugars, free amino acids, and anthocyanin in protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 64, 88–93 (1979). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  13. Nishimura, M. & Beevers, H. Hydrolases in vacuoles from castor bean endosperm. Plant Physiol. 62, 44–48 (1978). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  14. Granstedt, R.C. & Huffaker, R.C. Identification of the leaf vacuole as a major nitrate storage pool. Plant Physiol. 70, 410–413 (1982). | PubMed | ChemPort |
  15. Canovas, F.M. et al. Plant proteome analysis. Proteomics 4, 285–298 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  16. Rossignol, M. et al. Plant proteome analysis: a 2004–2006 update. Proteomics 6, 5529–5548 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Carter, C. et al. The vegetative vacuole proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals predicted and unexpected proteins. Plant Cell 16, 3285–3303 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Shimaoka, T. et al. Isolation of intact vacuoles and proteomic analysis of tonoplast from suspension-cultured cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 672–683 (2004). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  19. Rojo, E., Zouhar, J., Carter, C., Kovaleva, V. & Raikhel, N.V. A unique mechanism for protein processing and degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7389–7394 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  20. Dubrovsky, J.G. et al. Neutral red as a probe for confocal laser scanning microscopy studies of plant roots. Ann. Bot. (Lond) 97, 1127–1138 (2006). | Article | PubMed |
  21. Ahmed, S.U. et al. The plant vacuolar sorting receptor AtELP is involved in transport of NH(2)-terminal propeptide-containing vacuolar proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Cell. Biol. 149, 1335–1344 (2000). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  1. Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, Center for Plant Cell Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA.
  2. Present addresses. Departamento de Genética Molecular de Plantas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid E-28049, Spain.
  3. Department of Biology, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, USA.

Correspondence to: Natasha Raikhel1 e-mail: nraikhel@ucr.edu

natureproducts

Natureproducts is an online service detailing information about specific products used in this article. You can view the product descriptions, request information and compare with other similar products. The products used are listed in alphabetical order.

A-Z product listing

See more nature products

Extra navigation

Feedback

Browse by category

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT