Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Studying extracellular vesicle transfer by a Cre-loxP method

Nature Protocols volume 11, pages 87–101 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Extracellular vesicle (EV) transfer is increasingly recognized as an important mode of intercellular communication by transferring a wide variety of biomolecules between cells. The characterization of in vitro– or ex vivo–isolated EVs has considerably contributed to the understanding of biological functions of EV transfer. However, the study of EV release and uptake in an in vivo setting has remained challenging, because cells that take up EVs could not be discriminated from cells that do not take up EVs. Recently, a technique based on the Cre-loxP system was developed to fluorescently mark Cre-reporter cells that take up EVs released by Cre recombinase–expressing cells in various in vitro and in vivo settings. Here we describe a detailed protocol for the generation of Cre+ cells and reporter+ cells, which takes ∼6 weeks, and subsequent assays with these lines to study functional EV transfer in in vitro and in vivo (mouse) settings, which take up to ∼2 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The Cre-loxP method for studying EV transfer in vitro and in vivo.
Figure 2: The generation of Cre+ and reporter+ cell lines.
Figure 3: Visualization and quantification of in vitro EV transfer.
Figure 4: Studying the functions of in vivo EV transfer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratajczak, J. et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived microvesicles reprogram hematopoietic progenitors: evidence for horizontal transfer of mRNA and protein delivery. Leukemia 20, 847–856 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Valadi, H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pegtel, D.M. et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6328–6333 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hood, J.L., San, R.S. & Wickline, S.A. Exosomes released by melanoma cells prepare sentinel lymph nodes for tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 71, 3792–3801 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa-Silva, B. et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 816–826 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peinado, H. et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat. Med. 18, 883–891 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, Z. et al. Activated T cell exosomes promote tumor invasion via Fas signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 188, 5954–5961 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luga, V. et al. Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell 151, 1542–1556 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Salomon, C. et al. Hypoxia-induced changes in the bioactivity of cytotrophoblast-derived exosomes. PLoS ONE 8, e79636 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boelens, M.C. et al. Exosome transfer from stromal to breast cancer cells regulates therapy resistance pathways. Cell 159, 499–513 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Melo, S.A. et al. Cancer exosomes perform cell-independent microRNA biogenesis and promote tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell 26, 707–721 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zomer, A. et al. In vivo imaging reveals extracellular vesicle-mediated phenocopying of metastatic behavior. Cell 161, 1046–1057 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raposo, G. & Stoorvogel, W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J. Cell Biol. 200, 373–383 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Thery, C. Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol. Rep. 3, 15 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Colombo, M., Raposo, G. & Thery, C. Biogenesis, secretion, and intercellular interactions of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 255–289 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Minciacchi, V.R., Freeman, M.R. & Di Vizio, D. Extracellular vesicles in cancer: exosomes, microvesicles and the emerging role of large oncosomes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 40, 41–51 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sverdlov, E.D. Amedeo Avogadro’s cry: what is 1 μg of exosomes? Bioessays 34, 873–875 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ridder, K. et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of genetic information between the hematopoietic system and the brain in response to inflammation. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001874 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ridder, K. et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of functional RNA in the tumor microenvironment. Oncoimmunology 4, e1008371 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 3 Unit 3.22 (2006).

  21. van der Pol, E., Boing, A.N., Harrison, P., Sturk, A. & Nieuwland, R. Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol. Rev. 64, 676–705 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bard, M.P. et al. Proteomic analysis of exosomes isolated from human malignant pleural effusions. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 31, 114–121 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gyorgy, B. et al. Detection and isolation of cell-derived microparticles are compromised by protein complexes resulting from shared biophysical parameters. Blood 117, e39–e48 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rood, I.M. et al. Comparison of three methods for isolation of urinary microvesicles to identify biomarkers of nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int. 78, 810–816 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gyorgy, B. et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2667–2688 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lotvall, J. et al. Minimal experimental requirements for definition of extracellular vesicles and their functions: a position statement from the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 3, 26913 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Christianson, H.C., Svensson, K.J., van Kuppevelt, T.H., Li, J.P. & Belting, M. Cancer cell exosomes depend on cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans for their internalization and functional activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17380–17385 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Svensson, K.J. et al. Exosome uptake depends on ERK1/2-heat shock protein 27 signaling and lipid raft-mediated endocytosis negatively regulated by caveolin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17713–17724 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai, C.P. et al. Visualization and tracking of tumour extracellular vesicle delivery and RNA translation using multiplexed reporters. Nat. Commun. 6, 7029 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoshino, D. et al. Exosome secretion is enhanced by invadopodia and drives invasive behavior. Cell Rep. 5, 1159–1168 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Suetsugu, A. et al. Imaging exosome transfer from breast cancer cells to stroma at metastatic sites in orthotopic nude-mouse models. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 383–390 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sung, B.H., Ketova, T., Hoshino, D., Zijlstra, A. & Weaver, A.M. Directional cell movement through tissues is controlled by exosome secretion. Nat. Commun. 6, 7164 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bobrie, A. et al. Rab27a supports exosome-dependent and -independent mechanisms that modify the tumor microenvironment and can promote tumor progression. Cancer Res. 72, 4920–4930 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mulcahy, L.A., Pink, R.C. & Carter, D.R. Routes and mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake. J. Extracell. Vesicles 3, 10.3402/jev.v3.24641 (2014).

  35. Vojtech, L. et al. Exosomes in human semen carry a distinctive repertoire of small non-coding RNAs with potential regulatory functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7290–7304 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zomer, A. et al. Exosomes: fit to deliver small RNA. Commun. Integr. Biol. 3, 447–450 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bolukbasi, M.F. et al. miR-1289 and 'zipcode'-like sequence enrich mRNAs in microvesicles. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 1, e10 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nordin, J.Z. et al. Ultrafiltration with size-exclusion liquid chromatography for high yield isolation of extracellular vesicles preserving intact biophysical and functional properties. Nanomedicine 11, 879–883 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. de Graaff and the Hubrecht Imaging Centre for imaging support. We thank A. Kamermans for experimental and imaging assistance and W. Karthaus for his help with cloning the pLV-CMV-LoxP-DsRed-LoxP-eGFP construct. We thank J. Segall (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York) for providing us with MDA-MB-231 cells. This work was supported by a Vidi fellowship (no. 91710330); research grants from the Dutch Organization of Scientific Research (NWO; no. 823.02.017), the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF; HUBR 2009-4621) and Cancer Genomics Netherlands (all to J.v.R.); and equipment grants (nos. 175.010.2007.00 and 834.11.002) from the Dutch Organization of Scientific Research (NWO).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Anoek Zomer and Sander Christiaan Steenbeek: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Hubrecht Institute-Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (KNAW) and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

    Anoek Zomer, Sander Christiaan Steenbeek, Carrie Maynard & Jacco van Rheenen

Authors
  1. Anoek Zomer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sander Christiaan Steenbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carrie Maynard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacco van Rheenen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.Z. and S.C.S. wrote the manuscript, prepared the figures and optimized the described procedures and the data presented. C.M. optimized the Transwell experiments and helped to write the manuscript. J.v.R. conceived and supervised the study, and helped to write the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacco van Rheenen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Visualizing uptake of in vitro-purified Cre+ EVs

EVs isolated from Cre+ C26 colorectal carcinoma cells were isolated using differential centrifugation as described in the Supplementary Methods. Different amounts of these EVs were added to C26 reporter+ cells and after 72 h incubation, eGFP+ cells were scored by fluorescence microscopy (n = 1).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 304 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zomer, A., Steenbeek, S., Maynard, C. et al. Studying extracellular vesicle transfer by a Cre-loxP method. Nat Protoc 11, 87–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.138

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.138

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing