Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

A ring barrier–based migration assay to assess cell migration in vitro

Abstract

Cell migration is a key feature of virtually every biological process, and it can be studied in a variety of ways. Here we outline a protocol for the in vitro study of cell migration using a ring barrier–based assay. A 'barrier' is inserted in the culture chamber, which prevents cells from entering a defined area. Cells of interest are seeded around this barrier, and after the formation of a peripheral monolayer the barrier is removed and migration into the cell-free area is monitored. This assay is highly reproducible and convenient to perform, and it allows the deduction of several parameters of migration, including total and effective migration, velocity and cell polarization. An advantage of this assay over the conventional scratch assay is that the cells move over an unaltered and virgin surface, and thus the effect of matrix components on cell migration can be studied. In addition, the cells are not harmed at the onset of the assay. Through computer automation, four individual barrier assays can be monitored at the same time. The procedure can be used in a 12-well standard plate allowing higher throughput, or it can be modified to perform invasion assays. The basic procedure takes 2–3 d to complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ring barrier–based migration assay.
Figure 2: Ring barrier configurations.
Figure 3: Flow diagram of the general protocol with the time course, the main steps in solid boxes and the options in dashed boxes.
Figure 4: Cell migration unit and configuration.
Figure 5: Migratory parameters.
Figure 6: Migratory responses to ECM coatings.
Figure 7: Co-culture assay and invasion assay.
Figure 8: Immunofluorescence stainings.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lauffenburger, D.A. & Horwitz, A.F. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359–369 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Horwitz, A.R. & Parsons, J.T. Cell migration–movin' on. Science 286, 1102–1103 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ridley, A.J. et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704–1709 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrie, R.J., Doyle, A.D. & Yamada, K.M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 538–549 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Trinkaus, J.P. Directional cell movement during early development of the teleost Blennius pholis: I. Formation of epithelial cell clusters and their pattern and mechanism of movement. J. Exp. Zool 245, 157–186 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, R.D. & Trinkaus, J.P. Fundulus deep cells: directional migration in response to epithelial wounding. Dev. Biol. 129, 179–190 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cory, G. Scratch-wound assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 769, 25–30 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, C.C., Park, A.Y. & Guan, J.L. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat. Protoc. 2, 329–333 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiang, L. et al. Regulation of cell proliferation and migration by p62 through stabilization of Twist1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9241–9246 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Varani, J., Orr, W. & Ward, P.A. A comparison of the migration patterns of normal and malignant cells in two assay systems. Am. J. Pathol. 90, 159–172 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt, B.M., Harris, A.S., Morrow, J.S. & Madri, J.A. Mechanisms of cytoskeletal regulation. Modulation of aortic endothelial cell spectrin by the extracellular matrix. Am. J. Pathol. 117, 349–354 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtaka, K., Watanabe, S., Iwazaki, R., Hirose, M. & Sato, N. Role of extracellular matrix on colonic cancer cell migration and proliferation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220, 346–352 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Horssen, R. & ten Hagen, T.L. Crossing barriers: the new dimension of 2D cell migration assays. J. Cell Physiol. 226, 288–290 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Horssen, R., Galjart, N., Rens, J.A., Eggermont, A.M. & ten Hagen, T.L. Differential effects of matrix and growth factors on endothelial and fibroblast motility: application of a modified cell migration assay. J. Cell Biochem. 99, 1536–1552 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakker, E.R. et al. Wnt5a promotes human colon cancer cell migration and invasion but does not augment intestinal tumorigenesis in Apc1638N mice. Carcinogenesis 34, 2629–2638 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Das, A.M. et al. Differential TIMP3 expression affects tumor progression and angiogenesis in melanomas through regulation of directionally persistent endothelial cell migration. Angiogenesis 17, 163–177 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, C. et al. PDGF-induced migration of vascular smooth muscle cells is inhibited by heme oxygenase-1 via VEGFR2 upregulation and subsequent assembly of inactive VEGFR2/PDGFRβ heterodimers. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32, 1289–1298 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Horssen, R. et al. E-cadherin promotor methylation and mutation are inversely related to motility capacity of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 136, 365–377 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Drabek, K. et al. Role of CLASP2 in microtubule stabilization and the regulation of persistent motility. Curr. Biol. 16, 2259–2264 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Horssen, R. et al. Modulation of cell motility by spatial repositioning of enzymatic ATP/ADP exchange capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 1620–1627 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuiper, J.W. et al. Local ATP generation by brain-type creatine kinase (CK-B) facilitates cell motility. PLoS ONE 4, e5030 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorelik, R. & Gautreau, A. Quantitative and unbiased analysis of directional persistence in cell migration. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1931–1943 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Deforet, M. et al. Automated velocity mapping of migrating cell populations (AVeMap). Nat. Methods 9, 1081–1083 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zaritsky, A. et al. Cell motility dynamics: a novel segmentation algorithm to quantify multi-cellular bright-field microscopy images. PLoS ONE 6, e27593 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huth, J. et al. Significantly improved precision of cell migration analysis in time-lapse video microscopy through use of a fully automated tracking system. BMC Cell Biol. 11, 24 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Brouwer and colleagues of the Erasmus Medical Instrumentation Service for assistance with the development of the migration barriers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M.D. and T.L.M.t.H. conceived the project. A.M.D. performed experiments and data analysis. A.M.D. and T.L.M.t.H. prepared the figures. A.M.D. wrote the manuscript and A.M.M.E. and T.L.M.t.H. critically revised it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo L M ten Hagen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Cell migration barrier.

The cell migration barrier consists of a surgical stainless steel cylinder and a three legged spacer made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK). The basic dimensions of the cell migration barrier are provided.

Supplementary Figure 2 Cell invasion barrier.

The cell invasion barrier consists of a surgical stainless steel cylinder and a three legged spacer made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK). The basic dimensions of the cell invasion barrier are provided.

Supplementary Figure 3 Cell migration unit configurations.

Images of cell migration unit configurations for imaging (a) multiple cell chambers (b) single cell chamber and (c) 12-well plates with the unit components: Cell migration units (1), Cell migration heater (2), Anti-fog glass heater (3), Gas humidifier/heater (4) and suitable microscopes (5).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–3 (PDF 122 kb)

Supplementary Manual 1

Interactive PDF of the cell migration barrier. This interactive file can be viewed using Adobe Acrobat XI or Adobe Acrobat Pro. The migration barrier can be viewed in 3D and dimensions measured using the ‘3D measurement tool’ under the ‘Tools’ menu. To access the ‘Tools’ menu, right click on the figure. Scaling, 1 model unit = 1000 mm. (PDF 508 kb)

Supplementary Manual 2

Interactive PDF of the cell invasion barrier. This interactive file can be viewed using Adobe Acrobat XI or Adobe Acrobat Pro. The invasion barrier can be viewed in 3D and dimensions measured using the ‘3D measurement tool’ under the ‘Tools’ menu. To access the ‘Tools’ menu, right click on the figure. Scaling, 1 model unit= 1000 mm. (PDF 500 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

STEP file for migration barrier. (TXT 149 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

IGS file for migration barrier. (TXT 398 kb)

Supplementary Data 3

STEP file for invasion barrier. (TXT 98 kb)

Supplementary Data 4

IGS file for invasion barrier. (TXT 266 kb)

Ring-barrier based migration assay. (MOV 29491 kb)

Metastatic melanoma (MM) cell migration on fibronectin coating.

Cell migration was imaged by time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy and an image was collected every 12 min for 16 h. The movie is set to a display rate of 10 frames/s and takes 8s. Original magnification ×10. (MOV 5280 kb)

Non-metastatic melanoma (NM) cell migration on fibronectin coating.

Cell migration was imaged by time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy and an image was collected every 12 min for 16 h. The movie is set to a display rate of 10 frames/s and takes 8s. Original magnification ×10. (MOV 3645 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, A., Eggermont, A. & ten Hagen, T. A ring barrier–based migration assay to assess cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc 10, 904–915 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.056

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.056

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing