Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells

Abstract

Here we describe a simple and efficient protocol for derivation of germline chimera-competent mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) from embryonic day 3.5 (E3.5) blastocysts. The protocol involves the use of early-passage mouse embryonic fibroblast feeders (MEF) and the alternation of fetal bovine serum– and serum replacement (SR)–containing media. As compared to other available protocols for mESCs derivation, our protocol differs in the combination of commercial availability of all reagents, technical simplicity and high efficiency. mESC lines are derived with approximately 50% efficiency (50 independent mESC lines derived from 96 blastocysts). We believe that this protocol could be a good starting point for (i) setting up the derivation of mESC lines in a laboratory and (ii) incorporating further steps to improve efficiency or adapt the protocol to other applications. The whole process (from blastocyst extraction to the freezing of mESC line) usually takes between 15 and 20 d.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Individual steps of mESC derivation.
Figure 2: Derivation of germline-competent chimeras from newly derived mESCs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans, M.J. & Kaufman, M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin, G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 7634–7638 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson, J.A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bongso, A., Fong, C.Y., Ng, S.C. & Ratnam, S. Isolation and culture of inner cell mass cells from human blastocysts. Hum. Reprod. 9, 2110–2117 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley, A., Evans, M., Kaufman, M.H. & Robertson, E. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 309, 255–256 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, A.G. et al. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336, 688–690 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, R.L. et al. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336, 684–687 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miura, T., Mattson, M.P. & Rao, M.S. Cellular lifespan and senescence signaling in embryonic stem cells. Aging Cell 3, 333–343 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, E.J. Embryo-derived stem cell lines. in Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach (ed. Robertson, E.J.) pp 71–112 (IRL Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hogan, B. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY, USA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagy, A. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual Edn. 3 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbondanzo, S.J., Gadi, I. & Stewart, C.L. Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines. Methods Enzymol. 225, 803–823 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoonjans, L. et al. Improved generation of germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from inbred mouse strains. Stem Cells 21, 90–97 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McWhir, J. et al. Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non-permissive genetic background. Nat. Genet. 14, 223–226 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brook, F.A. & Gardner, R.L. The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5709–5712 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bryja, V. et al. An efficient method for the derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24, 844–849 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ying, Q.L., Nichols, J., Chambers, I. & Smith, A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115, 281–292 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanigaki, K. et al. Notch-RBP-J signaling is involved in cell fate determination of marginal zone B cells. Nat. Immunol. 3, 443–450 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kawase, E. et al. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 38, 385–390 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Auerbach, W. et al. Establishment and chimera analysis of 129/SvEv- and C57BL/6-derived mouse embryonic stem cell lines. Biotechniques 29, 1024–1028, 1030, 1032 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng, J., Dutra, A., Takesono, A., Garrett-Beal, L. & Schwartzberg, P.L. Improved generation of C57BL/6J mouse embryonic stem cells in a defined serum-free media. Genesis 39, 100–104 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank J. Wilbertz and his team from Karolinska Center for Transgene Technologies for ESC microinjections, C. Tello, J. Söderlund and L. Bryjová for excellent technical assistance, P. Sacchetti for critical reading of the manuscript, C. Collstam and C. Olsson for extraordinary animal maintenance, and members of the Arenas laboratory for assistance and stimulating discussions. Financial support was obtained from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, European Commission (EuroStemCell), Swedish MRC, Karolinska Institutet and Lars Hiertas Minnesfond. S.B. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest Arenas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryja, V., Bonilla, S. & Arenas, E. Derivation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc 1, 2082–2087 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.355

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.355

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing