Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

COBRA: combined binary ratio labeling of nucleic-acid probes for multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization karyotyping

Abstract

Combined binary ratio labeling (COBRA) is designed to increase the multiplicity of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)—i.e., the number of targets that can be distinguished simultaneously. In principle, chemical (ULS), enzymatic (nick translation or random priming) or PCR-based labeling procedures of probes can be used. The method was originally designed to label chromosome-painting probes, but has also been used for probe sets specific for subtelomeric regions. COBRA imaging requires a digital fluorescence microscope equipped for sequential excitation and recording of color images. Staining of all 24 human chromosomes is accomplished with only four fluorochromes, compared with five for methods based on combinatorial labeling. The COBRA procedure takes 6 h laboratory work, 2–3 d incubation and a few hours imaging. The method is routinely applied in research (cultured cells from human or mouse origin) or to support clinical diagnosis, such as postnatal and perinatal genetic testing and in solid tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Principles of COBRA labeling.
Figure 2: COBRA–FISH results on human metaphase chromosomes.
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nederlof, P.M. et al. Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry 11, 126–131 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nederlof, P.M., van der Flier, S., Vrolijk, J., Tanke, H.J. & Raap, A.K. Fluorescence ratio measurements of double-labeled probes for multiple in situ hybridization by digital imaging microscopy. Cytometry 13, 839–845 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Speicher, M.R., Gwyn, B.S. & Ward, D.C. Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH. Nat. Genet. 12, 368–375 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrock, E. et al. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273, 494–497 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanke, H.J. et al. New strategy for multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridisation: COBRA: COmbined Binary RAtio labelling. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 2–11 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szuhai, K. et al. Simultaneous molecular karyotyping and mapping of viral DNA integration sites by 25-color COBRA–FISH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 28, 92–97 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wiegant, J. et al. Differentially painting human chromosome arms with combined binary ratio-labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genome Res. 10, 861–865 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bezrookove, V. et al. Individuals with abnormal phenotype and normal G-banding karyotype: improvement and limitations in the diagnosis by the use of 24-colour FISH. Hum. Genet. 106, 392–398 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Szuhai, K. et al. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of a synovial sarcoma of the larynx with a t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) and trisomies 2 and 8. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 153, 48–52 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Engels, H. et al. Comprehensive analysis of human subtelomeres with combined binary ratio labelling fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 11, 643–651 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fodde, R. et al. Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 433–438 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hazelbag, H.M., Szuhai, K., Tanke, H.J., Rosenberg, C. & Hogendoorn, P.C. Primary synovial sarcoma of the heart: a cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis combining RT–PCR and COBRA–FISH of a case with a complex karyotype. Mod. Pathol. 17, 1434–1439 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Szuhai, K., Ijszenga, M., Tanke, H.J., Rosenberg, C. & Hogendoorn, P.C. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of four previously established and two newly established Ewing sarcoma cell lines. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 166, 173–179 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Telenius, H. et al. Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer. Genomics 13, 718–725 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Telenius, H. et al. Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP–PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4, 257–263 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiegler, H. et al. DNA microarrays for comparative genomic hybridization based on DOP–PCR amplification of BAC and PAC clones. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 36, 361–374 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rabbitts, P. et al. Chromosome specific paints from a high resolution flow karyotype of the mouse. Nat. Genet. 9, 369–375 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiegant, J. C. et al. ULS: a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 87, 47–52 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van de Rijke, F.M., Heetebrij, R.J., Talman, E.G., Tanke, H.J. & Raap, A.K. Fluorescence properties, thermal duplex stability, and kinetics of formation of cyanin platinum DNAs. Anal. Biochem. 321, 71–78 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiegant, J. & Raap, A.K. in Current Protocols in Cytometry (eds. Robinson, J.P et al.) 8.3.1–8.3.21 (Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koopman, L.A. et al. Recurrent integration of human papillomaviruses 16, 45, and 67 near translocation breakpoints in new cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 59, 5615–5624 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brink, A.A. et al. Simultaneous mapping of human papillomavirus integration sites and molecular karyotyping in short-term cultures of cervical carcinomas by using 49-color combined binary ratio labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 134, 145–150 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans J Tanke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szuhai, K., Tanke, H. COBRA: combined binary ratio labeling of nucleic-acid probes for multi-color fluorescence in situ hybridization karyotyping. Nat Protoc 1, 264–275 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.41

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.41

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing