Original Article

Neuropsychopharmacology (2008) 33, 913–923; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301461; published online 30 May 2007

Selective Effects of Cholinergic Modulation on Task Performance during Selective Attention

Maura L Furey1, Pietro Pietrini2, James V Haxby3 and Wayne C Drevets1

  1. 1Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
  2. 2Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  3. 3Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

Correspondence: Dr ML Furey, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 15K North Drive, Room 115B, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA, Tel: +1 301 594 777; Fax: +1 301 594 9959; E-mail: mfurey@mail.nih.gov

Received 2 March 2007; Revised 13 April 2007; Accepted 16 April 2007; Published online 30 May 2007.

Top

Abstract

The cholinergic neurotransmitter system is critically linked to cognitive functions including attention. The current studies were designed to evaluate the effect of a cholinergic agonist and an antagonist on performance during a selective visual attention task where the inherent salience of attended/unattended stimuli was modulated. Two randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover studies were performed, one (n=9) with the anticholinesterase physostigmine (1.0 mg/h), and the other (n=30) with the anticholinergic scopolamine (0.4 mc/kg). During the task, two double-exposure pictures of faces and houses were presented side by side. Subjects were cued to attend to either the face or the house component of the stimuli, and were instructed to perform a matching task with the two exemplars from the attended category. The cue changed every 4–7 trials to instruct subjects to shift attention from one stimulus component to the other. During placebo in both studies, reaction time (RT) associated with the first trial following a cued shift in attention was longer than RT associated with later trials (p<0.05); RT also was significantly longer when attending to houses than to faces (p<0.05). Physostigmine decreased RT relative to placebo preferentially during trials greater than one (p<0.05), with no change during trial one; and decreased RT preferentially during the attention to houses condition (p<0.05) vs attention to faces. Scopolamine increased RT relative to placebo selectively during trials greater than one (p<0.05), and preferentially increased RT during the attention to faces condition (p<0.05). The results suggest that enhancement or impairment of cholinergic activity preferentially influences the maintenance of selective attention (ie trials greater than 1). Moreover, effects of cholinergic manipulation depend on the selective attention condition (ie faces vs houses), which may suggest that cholinergic activity interacts with stimulus salience. The findings are discussed within the context of the role of acetylcholine both in stimulus processing and stimulus salience, and in establishing attention biases through top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of attention.

Keywords:

physostigmine, scopolamine, acetylcholine, human, cognition

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

How visual salience wins the battle for awareness

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Aug 2005)

Out of the spotlight: face to face with attention

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Nov 2007)

See all 3 matches for News And Views

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT