Original Article

Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 2033–2046. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301072; published online 19 April 2006

Clinical Research

Baseline Neurocognitive Deficits in the CATIE Schizophrenia Trial

The CATIE Investigators are listed in Appendix I.

Presented in part at the annual meetings of the International Congress for Schizophrenia Research in Savannah, Georgia, April 2005, and the Society for Biological Psychiatry in Atlanta, Georgia in May, 2005.

Richard S E Keefe1, Robert M Bilder2,3, Philip D Harvey4, Sonia M Davis5, Barton W Palmer6, James M Gold7, Herbert Y Meltzer8, Michael F Green2, Del D Miller9, Jose M Canive10, Lawrence W Adler11, Theo C Manschreck12, Marvin Swartz1, Robert Rosenheck13, Diana O Perkins14, Trina M Walker15, T Scott Stroup14, Joseph P McEvoy1,15 and Jeffrey A Lieberman16

  1. 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  2. 2Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  3. 3Department of Psychology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  4. 4Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  5. 5Quintiles Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA
  6. 6Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
  7. 7Maryland Psychiatry Research Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
  8. 8Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
  9. 9Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
  10. 10Psychiatry Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System and Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
  11. 11Clinical Insights, Glen Burnie, MD, USA
  12. 12Corrigan Mental Health Center, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  13. 13Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
  14. 14Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
  15. 15Department of Biological Psychiatry, John Umstead Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
  16. 16Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence: Dr RSE Keefe, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3270, Durham, NC 27710, USA, Tel: +919 684 4306, Fax: +919 684 2632, E-mail: richard.keefe@duke.edu

Received 17 October 2005; Revised 11 January 2006; Accepted 21 February 2006; Published online 19 April 2006.

Top

Abstract

Neurocognition is moderately to severely impaired in patients with schizophrenia. However, the factor structure of the various neurocognitive deficits, the relationship with symptoms and other variables, and the minimum amount of testing required to determine an adequate composite score has not been determined in typical patients with schizophrenia. An 'all-comer' approach to cognition is needed, as provided by the baseline assessment of an unprecedented number of patients in the CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness) schizophrenia trial. From academic sites and treatment providers representative of the community, 1493 patients with chronic schizophrenia were entered into the study, including those with medical comorbidity and substance abuse. Eleven neurocognitive tests were administered, resulting in 24 individual scores reduced to nine neurocognitive outcome measures, five domain scores and a composite score. Despite minimal screening procedures, 91.2% of patients provided meaningful neurocognitive data. Exploratory principal components analysis yielded one factor accounting for 45% of the test variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a single-factor model comprised of five domain scores was the best fit. The correlations among the factors were medium to high, and scores on individual factors were very highly correlated with the single composite score. Neurocognitive deficits were modestly correlated with negative symptom severity (r=0.13–0.27), but correlations with positive symptom severity were near zero (r<0.08). Even in an 'all-comer' clinical trial, neurocognitive deficits can be assessed in the overwhelming majority of patients, and the severity of impairment is similar to meta-analytic estimates. Multiple analyses suggested that a broad cognitive deficit characterizes this sample. These deficits are modestly related to negative symptoms and essentially independent of positive symptom severity.

Keywords:

cognition, neuropsychology, schizophrenia, clinical trials methodology, antipsychotics

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT