Original Article

Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 1854–1863. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300983; published online 30 November 2005

Preclinical Research

Dissociation between In Vivo Occupancy and Functional Antagonism of Dopamine D2 Receptors: Comparing Aripiprazole to Other Antipsychotics in Animal Models

Sridhar Natesan1, Greg E Reckless1, José N Nobrega2,4, Paul J Fletcher3,5 and Shitij Kapur1,5

  1. 1Schizophrenia Program and the PET Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
  2. 2Neuroimaging Research Section, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
  3. 3Biopsychology Section, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
  4. 4Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  5. 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Correspondence: Dr S Kapur, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, ARF Site, 33 Russell Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S2S1, Tel: +1 416 979 6890; Fax: +1 416 260 4206; E-mail: shitij_kapur@camh.net

Received 12 July 2005; Revised 6 October 2005; Accepted 14 October 2005; Published online 30 November 2005.

Top

Abstract

The novel antipsychotic aripiprazole requires high (>90%) striatal D2 receptor occupancy (D2RO) to be clinically active, but despite its high D2RO it does not show extrapyramidal symptoms. While most antipsychotics are active at nearly 65% D2RO, they show motor side effects when D2RO exceeds 80%. We investigated this discrepancy between D2RO, 5HT2 receptor occupancy (5-HT2RO) and in vivo functional activity of aripiprazole in comparison to haloperidol (typical) and risperidone (atypical) in animal models. All three drugs showed dose-dependent D2RO. While risperidone clearly showed higher 5-HT2RO than D2RO, aripiprazole and haloperidol showed higher D2RO than 5-HT2RO at all doses. Haloperidol and risperidone induced catalepsy at doses producing >80% D2RO, while aripiprazole despite higher D2RO (>90%) induced no catalepsy. Haloperidol and risperidone's ED50 values for inhibition of conditioned avoidance response (CAR) and amphetamine-induced locomotor activity (AIL) corresponded to approx60% D2RO. In contrast, aripiprazole showed a significant dissociation; while it blocked AIL at similar D2RO, a 23-fold higher dose (86% D2RO) was required to inhibit CAR. FOS expression in shell region of the nucleus accumbens was significant for all drugs at D2ROs that were effective in CAR. However, in the core region of the nucleus accumbens and dorsolateral striatum, aripiprazole differed from the others in that despite high D2RO it induced low FOS. Haloperidol and risperidone showed dose/occupancy-dependent prolactin elevations, while aripiprazole did not. Across models, haloperidol and risperidone show similar occupancy-functional antagonism of the D2 system, while aripiprazole shows a clear dissociation. Partial agonism of aripiprazole offers a good explanation for this dissociation and provides a framework for understanding occupancy-functional relationships of partial D2 agonist antipsychotics.

Keywords:

aripiprazole, antipsychotics, D2 and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy, animal models, functional antagonism

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

Neuropsychiatric disorders The choice of antipsychotics in schizophrenia

Nature Reviews Neurology News and Views (01 Jun 2009)

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT