Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 2505–2513. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301113; published online 7 June 2006
Clinical Research
Effects of Risperidone Augmentation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of Open-Label Treatment Followed by Double-Blind Continuation
Mark Hyman Rapaport1,2, Georges M Gharabawi3, Carla M Canuso3, Ramy A Mahmoud3, Martin B Keller4, Cynthia A Bossie3, Ibrahim Turkoz3, Robert A Lasser3, Amy Loescher3, Philippe Bouhours5, Fiona Dunbar6 and Charles B Nemeroff7
- 1Department of Psychiatry, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 3Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 4Department of Psychiatry, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- 5Janssen-Cilag, Berchem, France
- 6Janssen-Ortho Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
- 7Department of Psychiatry, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Correspondence: Dr MH Rapaport, Department of Psychiatry, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite C-301, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. Tel: +1 310 423 2600; Fax: +1 310 423 9397, E-mail: mark.rapaport@cshs.org
Received 17 June 2005; Revised 27 April 2006; Accepted 2 May 2006; Published online 7 June 2006.
Abstract
Approximately one-third of persons with depression do not respond to antidepressant monotherapy. Studies suggest that atypical antipsychotic augmentation may benefit these patients. We investigated the longer-term efficacy of risperidone augmentation of serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor treatment for resistant depression. In 57 in- and outpatient centers in three countries, we conducted a three-phase study with 4–6 weeks of open-label citalopram monotherapy, 4–6 weeks of open-label risperidone augmentation, and a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation phase. A total of 489 patients with major depressive disorder and 1–3 documented treatment failures entered the citalopram monotherapy phase (20–60 mg/day). Patients with <50% reduction in HAM-D-17 scores entered the risperidone augmentation phase (0.25–2.0 mg/day). Patients with HAM-D-17
7 or CGI-S
2 were randomized to risperidone or placebo augmentation. The primary outcome was time to relapse during the double-blind phase. During citalopram monotherapy, 434 patients had <50% HAM-D-17 reduction; 299 (68.9%) were fully nonresponsive (<25% reduction) and 135 were partially nonresponsive (25–49% reduction). Of the 386 nonresponders who entered the augmentation phase, 243 remitted and 241 entered the double-blind phase. Median time to relapse was 102 days with risperidone augmentation and 85 days with placebo (NS); relapse rates were 53.3 and 54.6%, respectively. In a post hoc analysis of patients fully nonresponsive to citalopram monotherapy, median time to relapse was 97 days with risperidone augmentation and 56 with placebo (p=0.05); relapse rates were 56.1 and 64.1%, respectively (p
0.05). Open-label risperidone augmentation substantially enhanced response in treatment-resistant patients, but the longer-term benefits of augmentation were not demonstrated in this study.
Keywords:
resistant depression, risperidone augmentation, citalopram
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Management of agitation and aggression associated with Alzheimer disease
Nature Reviews Neurology Review (01 May 2009)
RESEARCH
Neuropsychopharmacology Letter
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article

