Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 2505–2513. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301113; published online 7 June 2006
Clinical Research
Effects of Risperidone Augmentation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of Open-Label Treatment Followed by Double-Blind Continuation
Mark Hyman Rapaport1,2, Georges M Gharabawi3, Carla M Canuso3, Ramy A Mahmoud3, Martin B Keller4, Cynthia A Bossie3, Ibrahim Turkoz3, Robert A Lasser3, Amy Loescher3, Philippe Bouhours5, Fiona Dunbar6 and Charles B Nemeroff7
- 1Department of Psychiatry, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 2Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- 3Medical Affairs, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 4Department of Psychiatry, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- 5Janssen-Cilag, Berchem, France
- 6Janssen-Ortho Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
- 7Department of Psychiatry, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Correspondence: Dr MH Rapaport, Department of Psychiatry, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Suite C-301, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA. Tel: +1 310 423 2600; Fax: +1 310 423 9397, E-mail: mark.rapaport@cshs.org
Received 17 June 2005; Revised 27 April 2006; Accepted 2 May 2006; Published online 7 June 2006.
Abstract
Approximately one-third of persons with depression do not respond to antidepressant monotherapy. Studies suggest that atypical antipsychotic augmentation may benefit these patients. We investigated the longer-term efficacy of risperidone augmentation of serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor treatment for resistant depression. In 57 in- and outpatient centers in three countries, we conducted a three-phase study with 4–6 weeks of open-label citalopram monotherapy, 4–6 weeks of open-label risperidone augmentation, and a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation phase. A total of 489 patients with major depressive disorder and 1–3 documented treatment failures entered the citalopram monotherapy phase (20–60 mg/day). Patients with <50% reduction in HAM-D-17 scores entered the risperidone augmentation phase (0.25–2.0 mg/day). Patients with HAM-D-17
7 or CGI-S
2 were randomized to risperidone or placebo augmentation. The primary outcome was time to relapse during the double-blind phase. During citalopram monotherapy, 434 patients had <50% HAM-D-17 reduction; 299 (68.9%) were fully nonresponsive (<25% reduction) and 135 were partially nonresponsive (25–49% reduction). Of the 386 nonresponders who entered the augmentation phase, 243 remitted and 241 entered the double-blind phase. Median time to relapse was 102 days with risperidone augmentation and 85 days with placebo (NS); relapse rates were 53.3 and 54.6%, respectively. In a post hoc analysis of patients fully nonresponsive to citalopram monotherapy, median time to relapse was 97 days with risperidone augmentation and 56 with placebo (p=0.05); relapse rates were 56.1 and 64.1%, respectively (p
0.05). Open-label risperidone augmentation substantially enhanced response in treatment-resistant patients, but the longer-term benefits of augmentation were not demonstrated in this study.
Keywords:
resistant depression, risperidone augmentation, citalopram
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Neuropsychopharmacology Letter
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article

