Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology (2005) 30, 1238–1245, advance online publication, 23 February 2005; doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300697
Preclinical Research
Chronic Antidepressant Treatment Prevents Accumulation of Gs
in Cholesterol-Rich, Cytoskeletal-Associated, Plasma Membrane Domains (Lipid Rafts)
Robert J Donati1,2 and Mark M Rasenick1,3
- 1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- 2Basic and Health Science Department, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, USA
- 3Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Correspondence: Dr MM Rasenick, Department of Physiology & Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 835 S Wolcott Ave., M/C 901 Rm. E202, Chicago, IL 60612-7342, USA. Tel: +312 996 6641; Fax: +312 996 1414; E-mail: RAZ@uic.edu
Received 28 September 2004; Revised 28 December 2004; Accepted 11 January 2005; Published online 23 February 2005.
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that Gs
migrates from a Triton X-100 (TTX-100) insoluble membrane domain to a TTX-100 soluble membrane domain in response to chronic treatment with the antidepressants desipramine and fluoxetine. Antidepressant treatment also causes a Gs
redistribution in cells as seen by confocal microscopy. The current studies have focused on examining the possibility that the association between Gs
and the plasma membrane and/or cytoskeleton is altered in response to antidepressant treatment, and that this is relevant to both Gs
redistribution and the increased coupling between Gs
and adenylyl cyclase seen after chronic antidepressant treatment. Chronic treatment of C6 cells with two fuctionally and structurally distinct antidepressants, desipramine and fluoxetine, decreased the Gs
content of TTX-100 insoluble membrane domains by as much as 60%, while the inactive fluoxetine analog LY368514 had no effect. Disruption of these membrane domains with the cholesterol chelator methyl-
-cyclodextrin altered the localization of many proteins involved in the cAMP signaling cascade, but only Gs
localization was altered by antidepressant treatment. In addition, microtubule disruption with colchicine elicited the movement of Gs
out of detergent-resistant membrane domains in a manner identical to that seen with antidepressant treatment. The data presented here further substantiate the role of Gs
as a major player in antidepressant-induced modification of neuronal signaling and also raise the possibility that an interaction between Gs
and the cytoskeleton is involved in this process.
Keywords:
antidepressant, cytoskeleton, G protein, lipid raft, signaling
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Review author's response: pitfalls in isolating lipid rafts
Nature Reviews Neuroscience Correspondence (01 Jul 2007)
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Neuropsychopharmacology Original Article
Molecular Psychiatry Original Article

