INTRODUCTION

Although antidepressant drugs have been effectively used in the treatment of depression for more than 40 years, the mechanism responsible for their therapeutic action has not yet been fully explained. The initial hypothesis for the action of antidepressants (the so-called monoamine hypothesis: Bunney and Davis, 1965; Schildkraut, 1965) was based mainly on the elevation of brain levels of noradrenaline and serotonin produced by the early tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants. Although this hypothesis has enjoyed considerable support—for example, the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of depression and the loss of clinical efficacy of SSRIs in tryptophan-depleted patients (Nemeroff, 1998; Hirschfeld, 2000)—it does not provide an adequate explanation for the 2 to 3-week lag period from initiation of drug treatment to the clinical appearance of the therapeutic effects of antidepressant drugs. Another challenge to this hypothesis came from observations that monoamine depletion does not produce depressive symptoms in healthy individuals (Goodwin et al, 1972; Jesberger and Richardson, 1985; Richardson and Jesberger, 1986; Vaidya and Duman, 2001). Subsequent hypotheses suggesting that neuronal plasticity (ie the adaptation of neuronal systems following chronic exposure to antidepressant drugs) underlies their therapeutic actions have directed research to study the neurochemical effects of chronic rather than acute antidepressant treatments.

There is increasing evidence suggesting cellular and molecular adaptations at several levels of brain neurons in response to antidepressant treatment. It has been reported that antidepressant drug treatment blocks the stress-induced atrophy of CA3 pyramidal cells (Watanabe et al, 1992; Duman et al, 1999) and increases neurogenesis of hippocampal granule cells (Malberg et al, 2000). Chronic antidepressant treatment has been demonstrated to upregulate the cAMP response element-mediated (CRE-mediated) gene expression in the rat cortex and hippocampus (Thome et al, 2000), and to upregulate the expression of the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) in both rodents and humans (Nibuya et al, 1996; Dowlatshahi et al, 1998). CREB upregulation may activate downstream targets such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and tyrosine kinase receptor type B (trkB) after antidepressant treatment (Nibuya et al, 1996). Infusion of BDNF into the midbrain (Siuciak et al, 1997) or hippocampus (Shirayama et al, 2002) produces antidepressant-like effect in two animal models of depression: the forced swim test and the learned helplessness paradigm. While these findings support the hypothesis of a role for BDNF in the therapeutic actions of antidepressant treatments, additional chronic studies of clinically effective antidepressant agents are required to further this hypothesis.

A neuroprotective role for Bcl-2 has been established (Jacobson and Raff, 1995; Merry and Korsmeyer, 1997), and it has been demonstrated that Bcl-2 promotes neuronal regeneration in the mammalian central nervous system (Chen et al, 1997). Chronic treatment of rats with two structurally dissimilar mood-stabilizing agents, lithium and valproate, robustly increases Bcl-2 levels in the frontal cortex and markedly increases the number of Bcl-2 immunoreactive cells in frontal cortex layers 2 and 3 (Chen et al, 1999). These findings raise the question: does chronic antidepressant drug treatment have a similar effect on the expression of Bcl-2 protein in hippocampal neurons?

Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are a family of metallo-enzymes that catalyze the dismutation of the superoxide anion radical (O2·−) to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which in turn is reduced to water by catalase or peroxidases. Copper–zinc SOD exerts a protective action against brain injury and neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo (Imaizumi et al, 1990; Uyama et al, 1992; Greenlund et al, 1995). Altered Cu/Zn-SOD activity has also been implicated in neurodegenerative conditions such as Parkinson's disease (Saggu et al, 1989; Nishiyama et al, 1995). Previous work in our laboratory found that the expression of the SOD gene in PC12 cells could be upregulated by olanzapine, amitriptyline, or venlafaxine (Li et al, 1998, 2000). The role of Cu/Zn-SOD in the pathophysiology of depression and in the therapeutic actions of chronic antidepressant treatments, however, has not yet been investigated.

Our first objective in the present study was to determine whether the chronic administration of amitriptyline (a classic tricyclic antidepressant) or venlafaxine (a newer serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor antidepressant) alters the immunohistochemical staining of BDNF in the hippocampus, the brain area showing the highest level of BDNF expression (Phillips et al, 1990). Our second objective was to examine the effects of chronic amitripty-line or venlafaxine on the expression of Bcl-2 and Cu/Zn-SOD in hippocampal neurons. In addition, each of the drugs was tested in two doses (5 and 10 mg/kg), to see if dose-related differences in the expression of the neuroprotective proteins in hippocampal neurons might help to resolve the conflicting data reported by other investigators in the field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All procedures with animals were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and were approved by the University of Saskatchewan Animal Care Committee.

Animals and Treatment Paradigms

A total of 30 adult male Sprague–Dawley rats (200–225 g; Charles River, St Constant, PQ) were used in this study. The rats were housed two per cage and maintained on a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle with food and water freely available. After 1 week of acclimatization, the rats were subjected to the chronic administration of sterilized saline (n=10), amitriptyline (n=10), or venlafaxine (n=10) once daily for 21 consecutive days via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection. The amitriptyline and venlafaxine solutions were freshly prepared in sterilized saline. The volume of the injected solutions was 1.0 ml/kg. Both amitriptyline and venlafaxine were administered at two doses, 5 or 10 mg/kg (n=5 for each dose); these doses have been widely used in animal studies (Bodnoff et al, 1989; Ferretti et al, 1995; Gur et al, 1999). Over the course of the experiment, the rats were weighed every three days.

The rats were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.) 24 h after the last injection, and were perfused through the ascending aorta with 150–200 ml of 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) followed by 250–300 ml of a fixative solution of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The brains of the rats were removed after perfusion, postfixed for 24 h in the same fixative, and cryoprotected in 20% sucrose at 4°C for 2–3 days. Brain tissue blocks were frozen in 2-methylbutane prechilled with dry ice and then stored at −70°C until use.

Immunohistochemistry

The polyclonal primary antibody for Bcl-2 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). According to information provided by the manufacturer, this antibody was raised in rabbits and is specific for the epitope mapping at the amino terminus of human Bcl-2 which is identical to the corresponding mouse sequence, without cross-reactivity with other apoptosis-associated proteins. The antibodies for BDNF and Cu/Zn-SOD were purchased from Research Diagnostics, Inc. (Flanders, NJ). According to the manufacturer, both of these antibodies were also raised in rabbits. The antibody for BDNF is specific for BDNF with the epitope mapping at the amino terminus of the mature form of human BDNF (identical to the corresponding mouse sequence) and is nonreactive with NGF, NT-3, or NT-4. The antibody for Cu/Zn-SOD detects an approximately 19-kDa band in rodent tissues corresponding to the apparent molecular weight of Cu/Zn-SOD on immunoblots.

The detection of BDNF, Bcl-2, and Cu/Zn-SOD immunoreactivity was performed on free-floating sections using a conventional avidin–biotin–immunoperoxidase technique modified from published protocols (Kim et al, 2000; Xu et al, 2002). Briefly, sections were pretreated with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity, and then, following washes with PBS, were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a blocking solution composed of 5% normal serum, 1% BSA, and 1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Sections were next incubated with one of the primary antibodies at dilutions of 1:1000 (the antibody to BDNF), 1:3000 (the antibody to Bcl-2), or 1:4000 (the antibody to Zn/Cu-SOD) in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1% normal serum, for 48 h at 4°C followed by 2 h at room temperature. The primary antibodies were localized using Vectastain Elite reagents (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and the reaction products were developed using 0.025% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) as chromogen diluted in Tris-HCl-buffered saline (TBS; 0.05 M, pH 7.6) and 0.03% H2O2 as substrate. Immunohistochemical controls were performed as above except for the omission of the primary antibodies. No positive immunostaining was found in any controls.

Densitometric Analysis

Quantitative image analysis was performed using the Zeiss Axioskop microscope equipped with a ×6.3 objective lens, a stabilized light source, and an interference filter (546 nm). Images were captured by a Sony RGB color camera and digitized on a monitor into 512×512 pixels, wherein the gray scales were measured and analyzed with a computer software package (Northern Eclipse 5.0; Empix Imaging, Mississauga, ON). For BDNF, measurements were taken in the pyramidal cell layer of Ammon's horn (including CA1 to CA4), and in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus. Both of these cell types showed intense BDNF immunostaining. For Bcl-2, measurements were performed in hippocampal mossy fibers, because the particularly intense Bcl-2 immunostaining was confined to these fibers. For Cu/Zn-SOD, measurements were performed in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus because of its moderate immunostaining and ease of measurement. For all measurements, the magnification was ×5. Background values were taken from the corpus callosum, which had very weak immunostaining in all sections.

Optical densities of background and target areas were determined by assigning a numerical value between 0 (black) and 255 (white) to each pixel according to its gray-scale value. Furthermore, a percentage difference score (DS) in optical density was calculated according to the following formula (Armitage et al, 1998):

We have calibrated the values of the DS from all rats in each group by using this formula, in which the impact of background has been minimized. In addition, we have taken a series of steps to be certain that the quantitative data of the DS are nonbiased. Brain tissue blocks from each rat were sectioned at 30 μm, and every other section was collected for immunohistochemical staining. For each tissue block, 60 sections were collected in 0.01 M PBS in six wells of a six-well tissue culture plate. For each well (for a given antibody), sections were selected in the same manner (ie every sixth collected section was placed in the same well). Each well contained a total of 30 sections, representing a control rat and two drug-treated rats. The spatial differences of selected sections from different groups were minimized, in that we used five animals in each group. All of these 30 sections passed through all procedures always in the same conditions, to minimize any differences from immunohistochemical staining itself. Similarly, all conditions were identical for the densitometric analysis.

Statistical Analysis

Body weight data and the data from the optical densitometry of all three antibodies were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Newman–Keuls post hoc tests with a significance level of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Weight Gain

Table 1 shows the body weights. Chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine did not alter the weight gain of the injected rats over the injection period of 3 weeks, although the high dose of the drugs seemed to attenuate the weight gain of the animals in the last week.

Table 1 Influence of Chronic Antidepressant Drugs on Weight Gain of Rats

BDNF Immunoreactivity

In a representative vehicle-injected control rat (Figure 1), the greatest intensity of BDNF immunostaining was seen in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer and in the dentate granular cell layer, while the neuropil of the hippocampus was immunostained weakly. The photo in Figure 1b was from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of amitriptyline. The intensity of BDNF immunostaining in all hippocampal subareas of this rat is greater than that of the corresponding subareas of the control (Figure 1a). Comparing Figure 1a with c (from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of amitriptyline), no evident difference was observed. In Figure 1d (from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of venlafaxine) the intensity of the immunostaining in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer of this rat is greater than that in the control (Figure 1a), and the intensity of immunostaining in the dentate granule cell layer is comparable to that in the control. In Figure 1e (from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of venlafaxine), the intensity of BDNF immunostaining in all hippocampal subareas is markedly lower than that in the corresponding subareas of the control.

Figure 1
figure 1

Effects of the chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine on BDNF immunoreactivity in hippocampal neurons of rats. (a) The distribution pattern of BDNF immunostaining in the hippocampus from a saline-injected control rat. The greatest intensity of BDNF immunostaining is seen in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer and in the dentate granular cell layer. The neuropil of the hippocampus is immunostained weakly. (b) Low-dose amitriptyline (5 mg/kg) increased the intensity of BDNF immunostaining in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer, throughout CA1 to CA4. The increase in the intensity of BDNF immunostaining in the dentate granular cell layer is not as evident as in the pyramidal cell layer. (c) With high-dose amitriptyline (10 mg/kg) the intensity of BDNF immunostaining in a rat is comparable to that in the saline-injected control. (d) Low-dose venlafaxine (5 mg/kg) increased the intensity of BDNF immunostaining. (e) High-dose venlafaxine (10 mg/kg) decreased the intensity of BDNF mmunostaining in all subareas of the hippocampus.

Calculated percentage difference scores in optical density of BDNF immunostaining in the different groups are displayed in Figure 2. The low dose (5 mg/kg) of amitriptyline significantly increased the DS values of BDNF immunostaining in CA1 to CA4, but not in the dentate granule cell layer. No significant differences were found between the animals treated with the high dose (10 mg/kg) of amitriptyline and the control group, while the differences between the low and high doses of the drug-treated animals were significant. The low dose of venlafaxine significantly increased the DS values of BDNF immunostaining in the pyramidal cell layer CA1 to CA4, but not in the dentate granule cell layer. In contrast to amitriptyline, the high dose (10 mg/kg) of venlafaxine significantly decreased the DS values of BDNF immunostaining in all hippocampal subareas. The differences between the low and high doses of venlafaxine-treated animals are also significant.

Figure 2
figure 2

Percentage difference score (DS) in optical density of BDNF immunostaining in different hippocampal subareas of rats injected with saline (n=5 each for two control groups); amitriptyline (AMI) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose; or venlafaxine (Ven) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose. Average DS (±SEM) is shown for each group in each hippocampal subarea. *p<0.05. **p<0.01.

Bcl-2 Immunoreactivity

The pattern of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the hippocampus is shown in Figure 3. Particularly intense Bcl-2 immunostaining was seen only in the hippocampal mossy fibers that occupy the stratum lucidum of hippocampal CA3 (indicated by thick arrows). Cell bodies of pyramidal neurons and the dentate granular neurons were very poorly labeled for Bcl-2, while other layers were moderately stained. The immunostaining in the polymorph layer of dentate gyrus was largely confined to the neuropil, especially to the axonal collaterals (indicated by a thin arrow) of the dentate granular neurons. At higher magnifications, the intense Bcl-2 immunostaining in the hippocampal mossy fibers, and in the axonal collaterals of dentate granular neurons (Figure 3b,c), is clearly shown.

Figure 3
figure 3

Distribution pattern of Bcl-2 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of a saline-injected rat. (a) Intense Bcl-2 immunostaining is confined to the hippocampal mossy fibers (MF, indicated by thick arrows). The pyramidal cell layer (PL) and the dentate granular cell layer (GL) are very poorly labeled. The axonal collaterals in the polymorph layer of the dentate gyrus exhibit very dark staining (indicated by a thin arrow). (b) Intense Bcl-2 immunostaining seen in MF and the axonal collaterals of the dentate granular neurons under ×10 magnification. (c) Intense Bcl-2 immunostaining in MF and the axonal collaterals of the dentate granular neurons is clearly seen at 20× magnification.

Figure 4 shows the effects of the chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine on the Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers. The photo in Figure 4b was from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of amitriptyline. The intensity of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers of this rat is greater than that of the control (Figure 4a). Comparing Figure 4a with c (from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of amitriptyline), no evident difference was observed. In Figure 4d (from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of venlafaxine), the intensity of the immunostaining is greater than that in the control. In Figure 4e (from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of venlafaxine), the intensity is comparable to that in the control.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effects of the chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine on Bcl-2 immunoreactivity in the hippocampal mossy fibers of rats. (a) Control rat injected with saline. (b) Low-dose (5 mg/kg) amitriptyline increased the intensity of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers. (c) High-dose (10 mg/kg) amitriptyline did not affect the intensity of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers. (d) Low-dose (5 mg/kg) venlafaxine increased the intensity of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers. (e) High-dose (10 mg/kg) venlafaxine did not affect the intensity of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the mossy fibers.

Optical density measurements of Bcl-2 immunoreactivity confirmed that the low dose (5 mg/kg) of amitriptyline (p<0.05) or venlafaxine (p<0.01) increased the DS values of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the hippocampal mossy fibers of rats, but the high dose (10 mg/kg) of the drugs did not affect these values (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Percentage difference score (DS) in optical density of Bcl-2 immunostaining in the hippocampal mossy fibers of rats injected with saline (n=5 each for two control groups); amitriptyline (AMI) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose; or venlafaxine (Ven) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose. Average DS (±SEM) is shown for each group. *p<0.05, low-dose AMI vs saline control. **p<0.01, low-dose Ven vs saline control.

Cu/Zn-SOD Immunoreactivity

The greatest intensity of the Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining was found in small neurons (indicated by arrows in Figure 6a,c) scattered in all layers of the hippocampus. In the dentate gyrus, the intense Cu/Zn-SOD positive neurons were seen mainly in the polymorph layer. In the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus, a trilaminar pattern of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining was seen (Figure 6b), with weak labeling in the inner molecular layer (iml), moderate labeling in the middle/outer molecular layer (m/o), and very light labeling in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (str l-m). The pyramidal cells were weakly stained; the granular neurons were moderately stained.

Figure 6
figure 6

Distribution pattern of Cu/Zn-SOD immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of a saline-injected rat. Top: The greatest intensity of the Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining is found in small neurons scattered in all layers of the hippocampus. The dentate granular cell layer was moderately immunostained; the pyramidal cell layer was weakly labeled. In the molecular layer of DG, a trilaminar pattern of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining is seen, with weak labeling in the inner molecular layer (iml), moderate labeling in the middle/outer molecular layer (m/o), and very light labeling in the stratum lacunosum-moleculare (str l-m). Bottom: (a) Layer CA1. Darkly immunostained neurons are found in stratum oriens (str or) and stratum radiatum (str rad) as indicated by arrows; ×20 magnification. (b) Molecular layer of DG. The specific trilaminar pattern of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in the molecular layer of DG is seen under higher magnification (×20). (c) Darkly immunostained interneurons, indicated by arrows, are seen in the polymorph layer of DG at ×nn magnification.

Figure 7 shows the effects of the chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine on the Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus. The photo in Figure 7c was from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of amitriptyline. The intensity of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus of this rat is greater than that of the control (Figure 7a). Comparing Figure 7a with b (from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of amitriptyline), the difference was not evident. In Figure 7d (from a rat injected with 5 mg/kg of venlafaxine), the intensity of the immunostaining is comparable to the control. In Figure 7e (from a rat injected with 10 mg/kg of venlafaxine), the intensity is greater than that in the control.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effects of the chronic administration of amitriptyline or venlafaxine on Cu/Zn-SOD immunoreactivity in the dentate granular cell layer. (a) Control rat injected with saline. (b) Low-dose (5 mg/kg) amitriptyline did not affect the intensity of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining. (c) High-dose (10 mg/kg) increased it. (d) Low-dose (5 mg/kg) venlafaxine did not affect the intensity of immunostaining. (e) High-dose (10 mg/kg) venlafaxine markedly increased it.

Optical density measurements of Cu/Zn-SOD immunoreactivity confirmed that the high dose (10 mg/kg) of amitriptyline (p<0.05) or venlafaxine (p<0.01) increased the DS values of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in the granule cell layer of rats, but the low dose (5 mg/kg) of these drugs had no significant effect (Figure 8).

Figure 8
figure 8

Percentage difference score (DS) in optical density of Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in the dentate granule cell layer of rats injected with saline (n=5 each for two control groups); amitriptyline (AMI) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose; or venlafaxine (Ven) low (n=5) or high (n=5) dose. Average DS (±SEM) is shown for each group. *p<0.05, high-dose AMI vs saline control. **p<0.01, high-dose Ven vs saline control.

DISCUSSION

Consistent with the earlier reports of elevated hippocampal BDNF mRNA following chronic, but not acute, administration of the antidepressant drugs tranylcypromine, sertraline, desipramine, mianserin, imipramine, or fluoxetine (Nibuya et al, 1995, 1996), the results of the present study indicate that hippocampal BDNF protein is elevated following chronic administration of the antidepressants amitriptyline or venlafaxine at the low dose (5 mg/kg). It should be noted that the elevated BDNF mRNA reported by the previous studies was observed both in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer and the dentate granule cell layer, while in the present study the elevated BDNF immunoreactivity was seen only in the hippocampal pyramidal cell layer. This discrepancy may be due to the different regulation of BDNF mRNA in the different subfields of the hippocampus; it has been reported that chronic electroconvulsive seizures decreased the acute induction of BDNF and trkB mRNA but markedly prolonged their duration in the dentate gyrus granule cell layer, while the seizures increased the acute induction of BDNF and trkB mRNA in CA3 and CA1 pyramidal cell layers (Nibuya et al, 1995).

Our results also suggest that the direction of the BDNF change is related to the dose of the antidepressant drug being given. The increase in the BDNF immunostaining in hippocampal pyramidal cells seen after the 5 mg/kg dose of either amitriptyline or venlafaxine (Figure 1) was not seen after the high dose. While high-dose amitriptyline did not alter BDNF immunostaining, high-dose venlafaxine actually reduced BDNF immunostaining in hippocampal neurons. This suggests that the high dose of the drugs in this paradigm is excessive and lacks neuroprotective effect on hippocampal neurons. Consistent with this suggestion, at 10 mg/kg both the drugs increased hippocampal Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining (Figure 7). The high dose of the drugs did not, however, affect the weight gain of the animals in the 3-week injection period (Table 1). Neither were abnormalities found in the animals’ general health or demeanor. In fact, the doses used in the present study have been demonstrated to be effective in animal models (Stockert et al, 1988; Bodnoff et al, 1989; Malatynska et al, 1995; Ferretti et al, 1995; McGrath and Norman 1998; Gur et al, 2002). Although we have not yet determined the causative factors for this paradox, the dose-related effects of the drugs on the BDNF immunostaining in hippocampal neurons may have functional significance and should be explored further.

Amitriptyline and venlafaxine are broad-spectrum antidepressant drugs that share the ability to inhibit the reuptake of both noradrenaline and serotonin from synaptic clefts. The former is a classic tricyclic antidepressant drug that is also a potent antagonist at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. The latter is a newer antidepressant drug that lacks antimuscarinic actions. It has been suggested that the activation of BDNF may be one of the final steps in a complex chain of intracellular events affected by anti-depressant treatments (Duman et al, 1997). The ability of antidepressant interventions to increase the concentration of noradrenaline and serotonin in synapses, and the subsequent downregulation of postsynaptic receptors for these two neurotransmitters, can be accomplished by a variety of mechanisms: inhibition of intracellular metabolism by monoamine oxidase, increased release from the presynaptic nerve terminal by downregulation of inhibitory presynaptic autoreceptors, or reduced removal from the synapse by blocking the reuptake transporter. These actions result in the alteration of a wide range of postsynaptic second-messenger systems (Reid and Stewart, 2001) that ultimately alter gene expression. It has long been known that the downregulation of brain β-noradrenergic receptors follows chronic, but not acute, exposure to antidepressant drugs (Vetulani and Sulser, 1975) and is a common consequence of the chronic administration of all clinically effective antidepressant drug treatments (Jesberger and Richardson, 1985). The functional and mechanistic connections between the ability of chronic antidepressant drugs to downregulate hippocampal β-adrenergic receptors (Richardson and Tiong, 1999) and to upregulate hippocampal BDNF (the present study) remain to be investigated.

Bcl-2 is a membrane-associated protein with both antiapoptotic and neurotrophic properties (Bernier and Parent, 1998a). The expression of this protein in the brain is induced as part of the cellular response to damage caused by cerebral ischemia (Ferrer et al, 1998), trauma (Nakamura et al, 1999), or oxidative stress (Kaufmann et al, 2001). Within the hippocampus, Bcl-2 immunostaining in mature brains is sparse or absent (Hara et al, 1996; Niwa et al, 1997); however, marked Bcl-2 immunostaining is found in immature brains, during neurogenesis in brains of any age (Bernier and Parent, 1998b); following seizures induced by domoic acid (Ananth et al, 2001) or by kainic acid (Henshall et al, 2001), and after chronic treatment with the antimanic drug lithium (Manji et al, 2000), the antiparkinsonian drugs talipexole or pramipexole (Takata et al, 2000), or the antidepressant drugs amitriptyline or venlafaxine (the present study).

The specific pattern of hippocampal Bcl-2 immunostaining differs among these studies. Bernier and Parent (1998b) observed Bcl-2 in the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus in both immature and mature primate brains; Takata et al, (2000) noted elevated Bcl-2 immunostaining in hippocampal dendritic processes; and in the present study we found increased Bcl-2 immunostaining in the hippocampal mossy fibers. These differences may result from different experimental conditions, such as tissue fixation, tissue processing subsequent to fixation, or other aspects of the immunohistochemical protocol (Sofroniew et al, 1983). Since repeated electroconvulsive stimulation, but not antidepressant drug treatment, induces mossy fiber sprouting in the rat hippocampus (Gombos et al, 1999; Lamont et al, 2001), we suggest that the increased Bcl-2 immunostaining in hippocampal mossy fibers by the chronic administration of antidepressant drugs observed in the present study results from the upregulation of the Bcl-2 expression rather than from the sprouting of the mossy fibers. This is not conflicting with the significant increase of BDNF immunostaining by 5 mg/kg of the antidepressants, in view of the report that transgenic mice overexpressing BDNF do not show hippocampal mossy fiber sprouting (Qiao et al, 2001). No matter what the interplay between BDNF and Bcl-2 expression, Bcl-2 is a valuable marker that targets the hippocampal mossy fibers and BDNF immunostaining labels the cell bodies of hippocampal neurons.

Consider the changes in the expression of Cu/Zn-SOD compared with BDNF in hippocampal neurons following chronic exposure to the antidepressants. The low dose of both amitriptyline and venlafaxine increased the BDNF immunostaining in hippocampal neurons but had no effect on Cu/Zn-SOD. This suggests that the expression of BDNF is more sensitive to the drugs than is the expression of Cu/Zn-SOD. With the high dose, however, both drugs increased the Cu/Zn-SOD immunostaining in hippocampal neurons, whereas high-dose venlafaxine decreased the BDNF immunostaining in the same neurons but high-dose amitriptyline had no effect. This suggests that the increased expression of Cu/Zn-SOD may be the response of hippocampal neurons to the high doses of the antidepressants, doses that may be in the cytotoxic range. The immunostaining of Cu/Zn-SOD in the pyramidal cell layer is weak; in the granular cell layer of the dentate gyrus, it is moderately intense. This indicates that dentate gyrus granule cells have a greater ability to express Cu/Zn-SOD in response to chronic exposure to the antidepressants.