Abstract
Quantum states are the key mathematical objects in quantum theory. It is therefore surprising that physicists have been unable to agree on what a quantum state truly represents. One possibility is that a pure quantum state corresponds directly to reality. However, there is a long history of suggestions that a quantum state (even a pure state) represents only knowledge or information about some aspect of reality. Here we show that any model in which a quantum state represents mere information about an underlying physical state of the system, and in which systems that are prepared independently have independent physical states, must make predictions that contradict those of quantum theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).
Popper, K. R. in Quantum Theory and Reality (ed. Bunge, M.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 1967).
Ballentine, L. E. The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 42, 358–381 (1970).
Peierls, R. E. Surprises in Theoretical Physics 32 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1979).
Jaynes, E. T. in Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics (ed. Barut, A. O.) (Plenum, 1980).
Zeilinger, A. Letter. Phys. Today 52, 13–15 (February, 1999).
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. Quantum probabilities as bayesian probabilities. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002).
Spekkens, R. W. Evidence for the epistemic view of quantum states: A toy theory. Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007).
Jaynes, E. T. in Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information (ed. Zurek, W. H.) 381 (Addison-Wesley, 1990).
Harrigan, N. & Spekkens, R. W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Found. Phys. 40, 125–157 (2010).
Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A. & Schack, R. Conditions for compatibility of quantum-state assignments. Phys. Rev. A 66, 062111 (2002).
Gibbs, A. L. & Su, F. E. On choosing and bounding probability metrics. Int. Stat. Rev. 70, 419–435 (2002).
Bell, J. S. On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).
Hall, M. J. W. Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 250404 (2010).
Barrett, J. & Gisin, N. How much measurement independence is needed to demonstrate nonlocality? Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 100406 (2011).
Lewis, P. G., Jennings, D., Barrett, J. & Rudolph, T. The quantum state can be interpreted statistically. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6554 (2012).
Spekkens, R. W. Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005).
Einstein, A. Letter to Schrödinger (1935). Translation from Howard, D. Einstein on locality and separability. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 16, 171–201 (1985).
Hardy, L. Quantum ontological excess baggage. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. B 35, 267–276 (2004).
Montina, A. Exponential complexity and ontological theories of quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 77, 022104 (2008).
Montina, A. State-space dimensionality in short-memory hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. A 83, 032107 (2011).
Regev, O. & Klartag, B. Proc. 43rd Annual ACM Symp. Theory Comput., STOC’11 31–40 (ACM, 2011).
Fuchs, C. A. QBism, the perimeter of quantum Bayesianism. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5209 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Audenaert for code, and L. Hardy, M. Leifer and R. Spekkens for discussions. All authors are supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.F.P. devised the initial version of the result. All authors contributed to improvements in the result and the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 383 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pusey, M., Barrett, J. & Rudolph, T. On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Phys 8, 475–478 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2309
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2309
This article is cited by
-
Physical interpretation of non-normalizable harmonic oscillator states and relaxation to pilot-wave equilibrium
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
On the Reality of the Quantum State Once Again: A No-Go Theorem for \(\psi\)-Ontic Models
Foundations of Physics (2024)
-
Quantum Theories with Local Information Flow
Brazilian Journal of Physics (2024)
-
Training a quantum measurement device to discriminate unknown non-orthogonal quantum states
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Quantum Epistemology and Constructivism
Journal of Philosophical Logic (2023)