Many predictions and consequences of quantum mechanics defy intuition. New insights into the limits of communication between spatially separated parties could bring us closer to grasping the nature of the quantum world.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Brassard, G. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 250401 (2006).
Shimony, A. in Proc. Int. Symp. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 225 (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1983).
Popescu, S. & Rohrlich, D. Found. Phys. 24, 379–385 (1994).
Cleve, R. & Buhrman, H. Phys. Rev. A 56, 1201–1204 (1997).
Cleve, R., van Dam, W., Nielsen, M. & Tapp, A. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1509, 61–74 (1999).
van Dam, W. Thesis, Univ. Oxford (1999).
van Dam, W. Preprint at <http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0501159> (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popescu, S. Why isn't nature more non-local?. Nature Phys 2, 507–508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys374
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys374
This article is cited by
-
Connection between Bell nonlocality and Bayesian game theory
Nature Communications (2013)
