The conformal bootstrap

Journal name:
Nature Physics
Pages:
535–539
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nphys3761
Received
Accepted
Published

Abstract

The conformal bootstrap was proposed in the 1970s as a strategy for calculating the properties of second-order phase transitions. After spectacular success elucidating two-dimensional systems, little progress was made on systems in higher dimensions until a recent renaissance beginning in 2008. We report on some of the main results and ideas from this renaissance, focusing on new determinations of critical exponents and correlation functions in the three-dimensional Ising and O(N) models.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Sum rule geometry.
    Figure 1: Sum rule geometry.
  2. Ising [Delta][epsi] upper bound.
    Figure 2: Ising Δε upper bound.

    Upper bound on the leading -even scalar dimension Δε as a function of the leading -odd scalar dimension Δσ in a 3D CFT21. Although the only assumptions entering this bound are conformal invariance and unitarity, the resulting curve has an obvious kink near the critical dimensions of the 3D Ising model.

  3. Ising critical exponents.
    Figure 3: Ising critical exponents.

    World record determination of the leading scaling dimensions in the 3D Ising model from the conformal bootstrap (blue region) compared to the previous best Monte Carlo determinations (dashed rectangle)26.

  4. O(N) singlet upper bounds.
    Figure 4: O(N) singlet upper bounds.

    Upper bounds on the leading O(N) singlet dimension ΔS as a function of the leading O(N) vector dimension Δϕ, for different values of N. The black pluses show the large N computations (interpolated by the dashed line). The error bars on the curves for the Ising and O(N) models with N = 2,3,4,5,6 show previous determinations using Monte Carlo techniques, the ε-expansion, and high-temperature expansion. See ref. 22 and references therein.

  5. O(N) archipelago.
    Figure 5: O(N) archipelago.

    Allowed islands from the mixed correlator bootstrap for different values of N, assuming the O(N) vector ϕ and singlet S are the only relevant operators in their O(N) representations26. The Ising island is marked with a cross because it is too small to see on the plot.

References

  1. Andrews, T. The Bakerian lecture: on the continuity of the gaseous and liquid states of matter. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 159, 575590 (1869).
  2. Hopkinson, J. Magnetic and other physical properties of iron at a high temperature. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 180, 443465 (1889).
  3. Curie, P. Propriétés magnétiques des corps a diverses températures. Ann. Chim. Phys. 5, 289405 (1895).
  4. Smoluchowski, M. Molekular-kinetische Theorie der Opaleszenz von Gasen im kritischen Zustande, sowie einiger verwandter Erscheinungen. Ann. Phys. 330, 205226 (1908).
  5. Ising, E. Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Z. Phys. 31, 253258 (1925).
  6. Onsager, L. Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition. Phys. Rev. 65, 117149 (1944).
  7. Cardy, J. L. Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 3 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
  8. Mack, G. & Salam, A. Finite component field representations of the conformal group. Ann. Phys. 53, 174202 (1969).
  9. Polyakov, A. M. Conformal symmetry of critical fluctuations. JETP Lett. 12, 381383 (1970).
  10. Belavin, A. A., Polyakov, A. M. & Zamolodchikov, A. B. Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory. Nucl. Phys. B 241, 333380 (1984).
  11. Ferrara, S., Grillo, A. F. & Gatto, R. Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion. Ann. Phys. 76, 161188 (1973).
  12. Polyakov, A. M. Nonhamiltonian approach to conformal quantum field theory. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66, 2342 (1974).
  13. Osborn, H. & Petkou, A. C. Implications of conformal invariance in field theories for general dimensions. Ann. Phys. 231, 311362 (1994).
  14. Qualls, J. D. Lectures on conformal field theory. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04074 (2015).
  15. Rychkov, S. EPFL lectures on conformal field theory in D ≥ 3 dimensions. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05000 (2016).
  16. Simmons-Duffin, D. TASI lectures on the conformal bootstrap. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07982 (2016).
  17. Mack, G. All unitary ray representations of the conformal group SU(2,2) with positive energy. Commun. Math. Phys. 55, 128 (1977).
  18. Rattazzi, R., Rychkov, V. S., Tonni, E. & Vichi, A. Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT. JHEP 0812, 031 (2008).
  19. Dolan, F. A. & Osborn, H. Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion. Nucl. Phys. B 599, 459496 (2001).
  20. Poland, D., Simmons-Duffin, D. & Vichi, A. Carving out the space of 4D CFTs. JHEP 1205, 110 (2012).
  21. El-Showk, S. et al. Solving the 3D Ising model with the conformal bootstrap. Phys. Rev. D 86, 025022 (2012).
  22. Kos, F., Poland, D. & Simmons-Duffin, D. Bootstrapping the O(N) vector models. JHEP 1406, 091 (2014).
  23. El-Showk, S. et al. Solving the 3d Ising model with the conformal bootstrap II.  c-minimization and precise critical exponents. J. Stat. Phys. 157, 869914 (2014).
  24. Kos, F., Poland, D. & Simmons-Duffin, D. Bootstrapping mixed correlators in the 3D Ising model. JHEP 1411, 109 (2014).
  25. Simmons-Duffin, D. A semidefinite program solver for the conformal bootstrap. JHEP 1506, 174 (2015).
  26. Kos, F., Poland, D., Simmons-Duffin, D. & Vichi, A. Precision islands in the Ising and O(N) models. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04436 (2016).
  27. Hasenbusch, M. Finite size scaling study of lattice models in the three-dimensional Ising universality class. Phys. Rev. B 82, 174433 (2010).
  28. Batkovich, D. V., Chetyrkin, K. G. & Kompaniets, M. V. Six loop analytical calculation of the field anomalous dimension and the critical exponent η in O(n)-symmetric φ4 model. Nucl. Phys. B 906, 147 (2016).
  29. Campostrini, M., Pelissetto, A., Rossi, P. & Vicari, E. 25th order high temperature expansion results for three-dimensional Ising like systems on the simple cubic lattice. Phys. Rev. E 65, 066127 (2002).
  30. Chelkak, D. & Smirnov, S. Universality in the 2d ising model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables. Invent. Math. 189, 515580 (2012).
  31. Chelkak, D., Hongler, C. & Izyurov, K. Conformal invariance of spin correlations in the planar ising model. Ann. Math. 181, 10871138 (2015).
  32. Kos, F., Poland, D., Simmons-Duffin, D. & Vichi, A. Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago. JHEP 1511, 106 (2015).
  33. El-Showk, S. et al. Conformal field theories in fractional dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 141601 (2014).
  34. Rychkov, V. S. & Vichi, A. Universal constraints on conformal operator dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 80, 045006 (2009).
  35. Caracciolo, F. & Rychkov, V. S. Rigorous limits on the interaction strength in quantum field theory. Phys. Rev. D 81, 085037 (2010).
  36. Rattazzi, R., Rychkov, S. & Vichi, A. Central charge bounds in 4D conformal field theory. Phys. Rev. D 83, 046011 (2011).
  37. Rattazzi, R., Rychkov, S. & Vichi, A. Bounds in 4D conformal field theories with global symmetry. J. Phys. A 44, 035402 (2011).
  38. Vichi, A. Improved bounds for CFTs with global symmetries. JHEP 1201, 162 (2012).
  39. Rychkov, S. Conformal bootstrap in three dimensions? Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.2115 (2011).
  40. Liendo, P., Rastelli, L. & van Rees, B. C. The bootstrap program for boundary CFTd. JHEP 1307, 113 (2013).
  41. Gaiotto, D., Mazac, D. & Paulos, M. F. Bootstrapping the 3d Ising twist defect. JHEP 1403, 100 (2014).
  42. Nakayama, Y. & Ohtsuki, T. Approaching conformal window of O(n) × O(m) symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models from conformal bootstrap. Phys. Rev. D 89, 126009 (2014).
  43. Nakayama, Y. & Ohtsuki, T. Five dimensional O(N)-symmetric CFTs from conformal bootstrap. Phys. Lett. B 734, 193197 (2014).
  44. Chester, S. M., Pufu, S. S. & Yacoby, R. Bootstrapping O(N) vector models in 4 < d < 6. Phys. Rev. D 91, 086014 (2015).
  45. Caracciolo, F., Echeverri, A. C., von Harling, B. & Serone, M. Bounds on OPE coefficients in 4D conformal field theories. JHEP 1410, 20 (2014).
  46. Nakayama, Y. & Ohtsuki, T. Bootstrapping phase transitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems. Phys. Rev. D 91, 021901 (2015).
  47. Golden, J. & Paulos, M. F. No unitary bootstrap for the fractal Ising model. JHEP 1503, 167 (2015).
  48. Paulos, M. F. JuliBootS: a hands-on guide to the conformal bootstrap. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4127 (2014).
  49. Iliesiu, L. et al. Bootstrapping 3D fermions. JHEP 1603, 120 (2016).
  50. Komargodski, Z. & Simmons-Duffin, D. The random-bond ising model in 2.01 and 3 dimensions. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04444 (2016).
  51. Kim, H., Kravchuk, P. & Ooguri, H. Reflections on conformal spectra. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08772 (2015).
  52. Chester, S. M. & Pufu, S. S. Towards bootstrapping QED3. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03476 (2016).
  53. Behan, C. PyCFTBoot: a flexible interface for the conformal bootstrap. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02810 (2016).
  54. Iha, H., Makino, H. & Suzuki, H. Upper bound on the mass anomalous dimension in many-flavor gauge theories—a conformal bootstrap approach. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01995 (2016).
  55. Poland, D. & Simmons-Duffin, D. Bounds on 4D conformal and superconformal field theories. JHEP 1105, 017 (2011).
  56. Beem, C., Rastelli, L. & van Rees, B. C. The superconformal bootstrap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 071601 (2013).
  57. Alday, L. F. & Bissi, A. The superconformal bootstrap for structure constants. JHEP 1409, 144 (2014).
  58. Bashkirov, D. Bootstrapping the SCFT in three dimensions. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8255 (2013).
  59. Beem, C., Lemos, M., Liendo, P., Rastelli, L. & van Rees, B. C. The  superconformal bootstrap. JHEP 1603, 183 (2016).
  60. Berkooz, M., Yacoby, R. & Zait, A. Bounds on superconformal theories with global symmetries. JHEP 1408, 008 (2014).
  61. Chester, S. M., Lee, J., Pufu, S. S. & Yacoby, R. The superconformal bootstrap in three dimensions. JHEP 1409, 143 (2014).
  62. Chester, S. M., Lee, J., Pufu, S. S. & Yacoby, R. Exact correlators of BPS operators from the 3d superconformal bootstrap. JHEP 1503, 130 (2015).
  63. Alday, L. F. & Bissi, A. Generalized bootstrap equations for SCFT. JHEP 1502, 101 (2015).
  64. Bobev, N., El-Showk, S., Mazac, D. & Paulos, M. F. Bootstrapping SCFTs with four supercharges. JHEP 1508, 142 (2015).
  65. Bobev, N., El-Showk, S., Mazac, D. & Paulos, M. F. Bootstrapping the three-dimensional supersymmetric Ising model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 051601 (2015).
  66. Beem, C., Lemos, M., Rastelli, L. & van Rees, B. C. The (2, 0) superconformal bootstrap. Phys. Rev. D 93, 025016 (2016).
  67. Lin, Y.-H., Shao, S.-H., Simmons-Duffin, D., Wang, Y. & Yin, X. N = 4 superconformal bootstrap of the K3 CFT. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04065 (2015).
  68. Chester, S. M. et al. Accidental symmetries and the conformal bootstrap. JHEP 1601, 110 (2016).
  69. Chester, S. M., Iliesiu, L. V., Pufu, S. S. & Yacoby, R. Bootstrapping O(N) vector models with four supercharges in 3 ≤ d ≤ 4. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07552 (2015).
  70. Poland, D. & Stergiou, A. Exploring the minimal 4D SCFT. JHEP 1512, 121 (2015).
  71. Lemos, M. & Liendo, P. Bootstrapping chiral correlators. JHEP 1601, 025 (2016).
  72. Costa, M. S., Penedones, J., Poland, D. & Rychkov, S. Spinning conformal correlators. JHEP 1111, 071 (2011).
  73. Costa, M. S., Penedones, J., Poland, D. & Rychkov, S. Spinning conformal blocks. JHEP 1111, 154 (2011).
  74. Dymarsky, A. On the four-point function of the stress-energy tensors in a CFT. JHEP 1510, 075 (2015).
  75. Costa, M. S. & Hansen, T. Conformal correlators of mixed-symmetry tensors. JHEP 1502, 151 (2015).
  76. Echeverri, A. C., Elkhidir, E., Karateev, D. & Serone, M. Deconstructing conformal blocks in 4D CFT. JHEP 1508, 101 (2015).
  77. Rejon-Barrera, F. & Robbins, D. Scalar-vector bootstrap. JHEP 1601, 139 (2016).
  78. Iliesiu, L. et al. Fermion-scalar conformal blocks. JHEP 1604, 074 (2016).
  79. Li, D., Meltzer, D. & Poland, D. Conformal collider physics from the lightcone bootstrap. JHEP 1602, 143 (2016).
  80. Echeverri, A. C., Elkhidir, E., Karateev, D. & Serone, M. Seed conformal blocks in 4D CFT. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05325 (2016).
  81. El-Showk, S. & Paulos, M. F. Bootstrapping conformal field theories with the extremal functional method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 241601 (2013).
  82. Gliozzi, F. More constraining conformal bootstrap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 161602 (2013).
  83. Heemskerk, I., Penedones, J., Polchinski, J. & Sully, J. Holography from conformal field theory. JHEP 0910, 079 (2009).
  84. Pappadopulo, D., Rychkov, S., Espin, J. & Rattazzi, R. OPE convergence in conformal field theory. Phys. Rev. D 86, 105043 (2012).
  85. Fitzpatrick, A. L., Kaplan, J., Poland, D. & Simmons-Duffin, D. The analytic bootstrap and AdS superhorizon locality. JHEP 1312, 004 (2013).
  86. Komargodski, Z. & Zhiboedov, A. Convexity and liberation at large spin. JHEP 1311, 140 (2013).
  87. Alday, L. F. & Zhiboedov, A. An algebraic approach to the analytic bootstrap. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08091 (2015).
  88. Hartman, T., Jain, S. & Kundu, S. Causality constraints in conformal field theory. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00014 (2015).
  89. Hartman, T., Jain, S. & Kundu, S. A new spin on causality constraints. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07904 (2016).
  90. Komargodski, Z., Kulaxizi, M., Parnachev, A. & Zhiboedov, A. Conformal field theories and deep inelastic scattering. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05453 (2016).
  91. Hofman, D. M., Li, D., Meltzer, D., Poland, D. & Rejon-Barrera, F. A proof of the conformal collider bounds. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.03771 (2016).
  92. Maldacena, J. & Zhiboedov, A. Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry. Class. Quantum Gravity 30, 104003 (2013).
  93. Rychkov, S. & Tan, Z. M. The ε-expansion from conformal field theory. J. Phys. A 48, 29FT01 (2015).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

    • David Poland
  2. School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA

    • David Poland &
    • David Simmons-Duffin

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Additional data