All-optical coherent control of vacuum Rabi oscillations

Journal name:
Nature Photonics
Volume:
8,
Pages:
858–864
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.224
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

When an atom strongly couples to a cavity, the two systems can coherently exchange a single quantum excitation through the process of vacuum Rabi oscillation. Controlling this process enables precise synthesis of non-classical light, which plays a central role in quantum information and measurement. Although this control has been realized in microwave-frequency devices, it has been difficult to achieve at optical frequencies, which are essential for quantum communication and metrology. Here, we demonstrate coherent control of vacuum Rabi oscillation in an optical frequency device. We use a photonic molecule composed of two coupled nanocavities to simultaneously achieve strong coupling and a cavity-enhanced a.c. Stark shift. The Stark shift tunes a single quantum dot onto resonance with the photonic molecule on picosecond timescales, creating fast coherent transfer of energy between an atomic and photonic excitation. These results enable ultrafast control of light–matter quantum interactions in a nanophotonic device platform.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Device design and experimental set-up.
    Figure 1: Device design and experimental set-up.

    a, Schematic of quantum level structure of a cavity–quantum dot system in the presence of a strong off-resonant pulse denoted by the classical Rabi frequency Ω(t). The pulse induces an a.c. Stark shift that optically tunes the quantum dot on-resonance with the cavity. b, Scanning electron microscopy image of the fabricated photonic-crystal molecule composed of two evanescently coupled photonic-crystal cavities (scale bar, 1 µm), together with finite-difference time-domain calculations showing the Ey component of the anti-symmetric (bottom) and symmetric (top) modes of the device. c, Experimental set-up for all performed measurements. BS, beamsplitter; PBS, polarizing beamsplitter; OL, objective lens; HWP, half-wave plate; SMF, single-mode fibre; SPCM, single-photon-counting modules.

  2. Characterization of photonic molecule modes.
    Figure 2: Characterization of photonic molecule modes.

    a, Reflection spectrum of the photonic molecule, recorded at 45 K, showing the two coupled cavity modes (M1 and M2) and the quantum dot (QD). b, Reflection spectrum around mode M1 as a function of temperature. The quantum dot tunes across the cavity mode, exhibiting an anti-crossing.

  3. Stark shift-mediated energy transfer.
    Figure 3: Stark shift-mediated energy transfer.

    a, Cavity spectrum as a function of delay Δτ when the excitation pulse excites the quantum dot resonance. b, Intensity at Δλ = 0, determined from a, as a function of delay Δτ. c, Emission spectrum when the cavity is excited instead of the quantum dot. d, Intensity at Δλ = 0.07 nm (quantum-dot resonance) as a function of delay Δτ using data in c. eh, Numerically calculated results corresponding to the measurements shown in ad, respectively. In f and h, intensities are normalized to the values at Δτ = −100 ps.

  4. Rabi oscillations.
    Figure 4: Rabi oscillations.

    a, Measured reflection spectrum as a function of Stark laser power. b, Emission intensity at cavity resonance (blue squares) and at quantum-dot resonance (green circles), determined from the data in a. c, Calculated spectrum as a function of Stark power. The Stark field is expressed as a classical Rabi frequency with peak amplitude Ω0. d, Calculated emission intensity at cavity resonance (blue squares) and quantum dot (QD) resonance (green circles). Intensities are normalized by their maximum value.

  5. Coherent control of polariton energy transfer.
    Figure 5: Coherent control of polariton energy transfer.

    a, Emission spectrum as a function of delay Δτ when the quantum dot is tuned to resonance with the cavity. b, Emission intensity at the lower and upper polariton resonances as a function of delay between pump and probe. c, Calculated cavity spectrum as a function of delay between the excitation and Stark shift pulses. d, Calculated emission intensity at the lower polariton and upper polariton resonances. In b and d, intensities are normalized to the values at Δτ = −100 ps.

References

  1. Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 32213224 (1997).
  2. Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 10231030 (2008).
  3. Michler, P. et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science 290, 22822285 (2000).
  4. Faraon, A. et al. Coherent generation of non-classical light on a chip via photon-induced tunnelling and blockade. Nature Phys. 4, 859863 (2008).
  5. Reinhard, A. et al. Strongly correlated photons on a chip. Nature Photon. 6, 9396 (2012).
  6. Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nature Photon. 5, 222229 (2011).
  7. Gehr, R. et al. Cavity-based single atom preparation and high-fidelity hyperfine state readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203602 (2010).
  8. Reithmaier, J. P. et al. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot–semiconductor microcavity system. Nature 432, 197200 (2004).
  9. Yoshie, T. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature 432, 200203 (2004).
  10. Englund, D. et al. Controlling cavity reflectivity with a single quantum dot. Nature 450, 857861 (2007).
  11. Bochmann, J. et al. Fast excitation and photon emission of a single-atom-cavity system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 223601 (2008).
  12. Englund, D. et al. Ultrafast photon–photon interaction in a strongly coupled quantum dot–cavity system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 093604 (2012).
  13. Bose, R., Sridharan, D., Kim, H., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. Low-photon-number optical switching with a single quantum dot coupled to a photonic crystal cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 227402 (2012).
  14. Volz, T. et al. Ultrafast all-optical switching by single photons. Nature Photon. 6, 605609 (2012).
  15. Loo, V. et al. Optical nonlinearity for few-photon pulses on a quantum dot–pillar cavity device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 166806 (2012).
  16. Boozer, A. D., Boca, A., Miller, R., Northup, T. E. & Kimble, H. J. Reversible state transfer between light and a single trapped atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 193601 (2007).
  17. Ritter, S. et al. An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities. Nature 484, 195200 (2012).
  18. Kim, H., Bose, R., Shen, T. C., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. A quantum logic gate between a solid-state quantum bit and a photon. Nature Photon. 7, 373377 (2013).
  19. Reiserer, A., Ritter, S. & Rempe, G. Nondestructive detection of an optical photon. Science 342, 13491351 (2013).
  20. Hofheinz, M. et al. Generation of Fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 454, 310314 (2008).
  21. Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546549 (2009).
  22. Atlasov, K. A., Rudra, A., Dwir, B. & Kapon, E. Large mode splitting and lasing in optimally coupled photonic-crystal microcavities. Opt. Express 19, 26192625 (2011).
  23. Bayer, M. et al. Optical modes in photonic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 25822585 (1998).
  24. Bose, R., Cai, T., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. All-optical tuning of a quantum dot in a coupled cavity system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 231107 (2012).
  25. Dousse, A. et al. Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs. Nature 466, 217220 (2010).
  26. Majumdar, A., Rundquist, A., Bajcsy, M. & Vučković, J. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with a single quantum dot coupled to a photonic molecule. Phys. Rev. B 86, 045315 (2012).
  27. Bose, R., Sridharan, D., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. Large optical Stark shifts in semiconductor quantum dots coupled to photonic crystal cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 121109 (2011).
  28. Ates, S. et al. Non-resonant dot–cavity coupling and its potential for resonant single-quantum-dot spectroscopy. Nature Photon. 3, 724728 (2009).
  29. Fluegel, B. et al. Femtosecond studies of coherent transients in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 25882591 (1987).
  30. Sokoloff, J. P. et al. Transient oscillations in the vicinity of excitons and in the band of semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 38, 76157621 (1988).
  31. Lange, C. et al. Ultrafast nonlinear optical response of photoexcited Ge/SiGe quantum wells: evidence for a femtosecond transient population inversion. Phys. Rev. B 79, 201306 (2009).
  32. Guenther, T. et al. Coherent nonlinear optical response of single quantum dots studied by ultrafast near-field spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057401 (2002).
  33. Tan, S. M. A computational toolbox for quantum and atomic optics. J. Opt. B 1, 424432 (1999).
  34. Hennessy, K. et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system. Nature 445, 896899 (2007).
  35. Song, B.-S., Noda, S., Asano, T. & Akahane, Y. Ultra-high-Q photonic double-heterostructure nanocavity. Nature Mater. 4, 207210 (2005).
  36. Ota, Y. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot embedded in a H1 photonic crystal nanocavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 033102 (2009).
  37. Arakawa, Y., Iwamoto, S., Nomura, M., Tandaechanurat, A. & Ota, Y. Cavity quantum electrodynamics and lasing oscillation in single quantum dot–photonic crystal nanocavity coupled systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 18181829 (2012).
  38. Akahane, Y., Asano, T., Song, B.-S. & Noda, S. High-Q photonic nanocavity in a two-dimensional photonic crystal. Nature 425, 944947 (2003).

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Ranojoy Bose &
    • Tao Cai

Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering and Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

    • Ranojoy Bose,
    • Tao Cai,
    • Kaushik Roy Choudhury &
    • Edo Waks
  2. Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland and National Institute of Standards and Technology, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

    • Glenn S. Solomon &
    • Edo Waks

Contributions

E.W. conceived and designed the experiment. R.B. and T.C. designed and fabricated the device, conducted experiments and carried out analysis. K.R.C., E.W., T.C. and R.B. performed theoretical simulations. R.B. and E.W. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors. G.S.S. grew the quantum-dot wafer. E.W. supervised the work.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary information (811 KB)

    Supplementary information

Additional data