Spectral compression of single photons

Journal name:
Nature Photonics
Volume:
7,
Pages:
363–366
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.47
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

Photons are critical to quantum technologies because they can be used for virtually all quantum information tasks, for example, in quantum metrology1, as the information carrier in photonic quantum computation2, 3, as a mediator in hybrid systems4, and to establish long-distance networks5. The physical characteristics of photons in these applications differ drastically; spectral bandwidths span 12 orders of magnitude from 50 THz (ref. 6) for quantum-optical coherence tomography7 to 50 Hz for certain quantum memories8. Combining these technologies requires coherent interfaces that reversibly map centre frequencies and bandwidths of photons to avoid excessive loss. Here, we demonstrate bandwidth compression of single photons by a factor of 40 as well as tunability over a range 70 times that bandwidth via sum-frequency generation with chirped laser pulses. This constitutes a time-to-frequency interface for light capable of converting time-bin to colour entanglement9, and enables ultrafast timing measurements. It is a step towards arbitrary waveform generation10 for single and entangled photons.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Single-photon bandwidth compression scheme.
    Figure 1: Single-photon bandwidth compression scheme.

    a, A broad-bandwidth single photon (P) with a linear frequency chirp is converted into a narrowband photon of higher frequency via SFG with a strong laser pulse (L) of opposite chirp, in a nonlinear crystal (NL). b, Experimental set-up. Photon P is generated via SPDC in a β-barium-borate (BBO) crystal (type I, 1 mm) and sent through 34 m of optical fibre (SMF) to introduce a linear chirp via group velocity dispersion33. The strong laser pulse is antichirped after a double pass between two diffraction gratings (DG, 1,200 lines/mm)33. The spectrally narrowed photon is generated in a 1-mm-thick bismuth-borate (BiBO) crystal and detected with a photomultiplier tube (PMT) or sent to a spectrometer. For alignment purposes, the single photons can be substituted by a weak coherent state W, split off from the laser beam using a half-wave plate and a polarizing beamsplitter.

  2. Single-photon spectra versus wavelength (top) and relative frequency (bottom).
    Figure 2: Single-photon spectra versus wavelength (top) and relative frequency (bottom).

    The signal photons at the source (shown in red) have an initial bandwidth of 1,740 GHz centred at 811 nm after transmission through an interference filter. Once the quadratic phase is applied and the photons are upconverted, the photon bandwidth reduces to 74 ± 4 GHz centred at 399.70 nm (blue curve). The spectra are shown as normalized spectral intensities and, for the upconverted signal case, correspond to the average of six consecutive scans of 20 min acquisition time. We subtracted background counts determined by a supplementary scan with the signal photon path blocked. The blue dashed curve shows the theoretical spectrum of photons upconverted without our chirping technique, but with otherwise identical conditions.

  3. Wavelength tunability.
    Figure 3: Wavelength tunability.

    The centre wavelength of the upconverted light can be tuned by controlling the relative delay between the input pulses at the nonlinear crystal. The blue circles represent the centre wavelength of the upconverted single photon, spanning a range of 3 nm. The upconverted light from the weak coherent state behaves in the same way and is plotted with black squares. The lines are linear fits yielding slopes of −0.0640 ± 0.0005 nm ps−1 and −0.0641 ± 0.0001 nm ps−1 for the single photons and weak pulses, respectively. The vertical offset between the two curves (~0.2 nm) arises from a slight difference in the delay between the weak coherent state and the single photons at the crystal and a difference in their centre wavelength. Error bars are smaller than the data points.

  4. Temporal correlations with the idler photon.
    Figure 4: Temporal correlations with the idler photon.

    a, The signal and idler from SPDC are produced in pairs, strongly correlated in time with a total measured coincidence rate of 160,000 s−1 around zero delay. b, The upconverted single photon maintains the strong timing correlation expected from individual photon pairs, and a coincidence rate of 50 s−1 is detected. c, If the weak coherent state is upconverted instead, the histogram shows equal height peaks, as expected for pulsed, but uncorrelated events. For each histogram, the optical path length difference with the idler is accounted for in post-processing and the abscissa is a variable electronic delay. An additional electronic delay box, with an observed asymmetric temporal jitter, was used on the idler side only, causing the asymmetry in b and c. Error bars represent 1 s.d., which are too small to be observed at this scale.

References

  1. Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. J. Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation. Nature 450, 393396 (2007).
  2. Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135174 (2007).
  3. Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Walther, P. Photonic quantum simulators. Nature Phys. 8, 285291 (2012).
  4. Wallquist, M., Hammerer, K., Rabl, P., Lukin, M. & Zoller, P. Hybrid quantum devices and quantum engineering. Phys. Scr. 2009, 014001 (2009).
  5. Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature 414, 413418 (2001).
  6. Nasr, M. B. et al. Ultrabroadband biphotons generated via chirped quasi-phase-matched optical parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 183601 (2008).
  7. Abouraddy, A. F., Nasr, M. B., Saleh, B. E. A., Sergienko, A. V. & Teich, M. C. Quantum-optical coherence tomography with dispersion cancellation. Phys. Rev. A 65, 053817 (2002).
  8. Tittel, W. et al. Photon-echo quantum memory in solid state systems. Laser Photon. Rev. 4, 244267 (2010).
  9. Ramelow, S., Ratschbacher, L., Fedrizzi, A., Langford, N. K. & Zeilinger, A. Discrete tunable color entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 253601 (2009).
  10. Kielpinski, D., Corney, J. F. & Wiseman, H. M. Quantum optical waveform conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130501 (2011).
  11. Eisaman, M. D., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Polyakov, S. V. Invited review article: single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011).
  12. Hosseini, M., Sparkes, B. M., Campbell, G., Lam, P. K. & Buchler, B. C. High efficiency coherent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour. Nature Commun. 2, 174 (2011).
  13. Huang, J. & Kumar, P. Observation of quantum frequency conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 21532156 (1992).
  14. Vandevender, A. P. & Kwiat, P. G. High efficiency single photon detection via frequency up-conversion. J. Mod. Opt. 51, 14331445 (2004).
  15. Tanzilli, S. et al. A photonic quantum information interface. Nature 437, 116120 (2005).
  16. Langrock, C. et al. Highly efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths by use of upconversion in reverse-proton-exchanged periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides. Opt. Lett. 30, 17251727 (2005).
  17. Ramelow, S., Fedrizzi, A., Poppe, A., Langford, N. K. & Zeilinger, A. Polarization-entanglement-conserving frequency conversion of photons. Phys. Rev. A 85, 013845 (2012).
  18. Rakher, M. T. et al. Simultaneous wavelength translation and amplitude modulation of single photons from a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 083602 (2011).
  19. McGuinness, H. J., Raymer, M. G., McKinstrie, C. J. & Radic, S. Quantum frequency translation of single-photon states in a photonic crystal fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 093604 (2010).
  20. Dudin, Y. O. et al. Entanglement of light-shift compensated atomic spin waves with telecom light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 260502 (2010).
  21. Pelc, J. S. et al. Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm: performance and noise analysis. Opt. Express 19, 2144521456 (2011).
  22. Lvovsky, A. I., Sanders, B. C. & Tittel, W. Optical quantum memory. Nature Photon. 3, 706714 (2009).
  23. Liu, C., Dutton, Z., Behroozi, C. H. & Vestergaard Hau, L. Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses. Nature 409, 490493 (2001).
  24. Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 3rd edn (Academic Press, 2008).
  25. Raoult, F. et al. Efficient generation of narrow-bandwidth picosecond pulses by frequency doubling of femtosecond chirped pulses. Opt. Lett. 23, 11171119 (1998).
  26. Osvay, K. & Ross, I. N. Efficient tuneable bandwidth frequency mixing using chirped pulses. Opt. Commun. 166, 113119 (1999).
  27. Veitas, G. & Danielius, R. Generation of narrow-bandwidth tunable picosecond pulses by difference-frequency mixing of stretched pulses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 15611565 (1999).
  28. Simon, C. et al. Quantum memories. Eur. Phys. J. D 58, 122 (2010).
  29. Reim, K. F. et al. Towards high-speed optical quantum memories. Nature Photon. 4, 218221 (2010).
  30. Eckstein, A., Brecht, B. & Silberhorn, C. A quantum pulse gate based on spectrally engineered sum frequency generation. Opt. Express 19, 1377013778 (2011).
  31. Baek, S.-Y., Cho, Y.-W. & Kim, Y.-H. Nonlocal dispersion cancellation using entangled photons. Opt. Express 17, 1924119252 (2009).
  32. Treacy, E. Optical pulse compression with diffraction gratings. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 5, 454458 (1969).
  33. Diels, J.-C. & Rudolph, W. Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2006).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Quantum Computing and Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, N2L 3G1 Canada

    • J. Lavoie,
    • J. M. Donohue,
    • L. G. Wright &
    • K. J. Resch
  2. Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems and Centre for Quantum Computer and Communication Technology, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

    • A. Fedrizzi

Contributions

A.F. and K.J.R. conceived the idea for the study. K.J.R., A.F. and J.L. designed the experiment. J.L. performed the experiments and analysed the data. J.M.D. and L.G.W. contributed to building the experimental setup and in taking data. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. A.F. is supported by an ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award DE130100240.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary information (824 KB)

    Supplementary information

Additional data