Generating, manipulating and measuring entanglement and mixture with a reconfigurable photonic circuit

Journal name:
Nature Photonics
Volume:
6,
Pages:
45–49
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.283
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

Entanglement is the quintessential quantum-mechanical phenomenon understood to lie at the heart of future quantum technologies and the subject of fundamental scientific investigations. Mixture, resulting from noise, is often an unwanted result of interaction with an environment, but is also of fundamental interest, and is proposed to play a role in some biological processes. Here, we report an integrated waveguide device that can generate and completely characterize pure two-photon states with any amount of entanglement and arbitrary single-photon states with any amount of mixture. The device consists of a reconfigurable integrated quantum photonic circuit with eight voltage-controlled phase shifters. We demonstrate that, for thousands of randomly chosen configurations, the device performs with high fidelity. We generate maximally and non-maximally entangled states, violate a Bell-type inequality with a continuum of partially entangled states, and demonstrate the generation of arbitrary one-qubit mixed states.

At a glance

Figures

  1. A two-photon reconfigurable quantum circuit for generating, manipulating and detecting entanglement and mixture.
    Figure 1: A two-photon reconfigurable quantum circuit for generating, manipulating and detecting entanglement and mixture.

    a, Quantum circuit diagram consisting of pairs of Hadamard-like gates H′ = eiπ/2   · H (where H is the usual Hadamard gate) and Rz(φ=  rotations, that together implement Ûi,f(φj, φk), and two H′ gates and a controlled-SIGN or CZ gate, that together implement a CNOT. b, Waveguide implementation of the circuit composed of directional couplers and voltage-controlled thermo-optic phase shifters (marked as orange triangles). Directional couplers with splitting ratio η = 1/3 are marked as dots; all other couplers have η = 1/2.

  2. Classical and quantum interference fringes.
    Figure 2: Classical and quantum interference fringes.

    a, Interference fringe measured at the two outputs of a single MZ interferometer on the chip. Experimental data are presented as black circles. Solid lines show fits. b, HOM dip, measured using a single MZ interferometer as a beamsplitter. Two-photon coincidence counts are shown as black circles. The red line shows a fit to these data with Gaussian and sinc components, due to quantum interference and determined by the spectral filters used, and a linear term accounting for slight decoupling of the source. The blue line shows a fit to the measured rate of accidental coincidences, with Gaussian and linear components. Error bars in both figures assume Poissonian statistics.

  3. Statistical fidelity of photon coincidence count rates.
    Figure 3: Statistical fidelity of photon coincidence count rates.

    The histogram shows the distribution of statistical fidelity between ideal and measured coincidence probabilities, over 995 sets of eight randomly selected phases . 96% of phase settings produced statistics corresponding with theory to f > 0.97.

  4. Bell states generated and characterized on-chip.
    Figure 4: Bell states generated and characterized on-chip.

    ad, Real parts of the density operators of the Bell states |Φ+right fence, |Φright fence, |Ψ+right fence and |Ψright fence (a,b,c,d, respectively).

  5. CHSH manifold.
    Figure 5: CHSH manifold.

    a, The Bell–CHSH sum S, plotted as a function of phases α and β. In the α-axis, the state shared between Alice and Bob is tuned continuously between product states at α = 0, π and maximally entangled states at α = π/2, 3π/2. The β-axis shows S as a function of Bob's variable measurements, which can be thought of as two operator axes in the real plane of the Bloch sphere, fixed with respect to each other at an angle of π/2 but otherwise free to rotate with angle β between 0 and 2π. The blue curves show a projection of the manifold onto each axis. Yellow contours mark the edges of regions of the manifold that violate −2 ≤ S ≤ 2. Red lines on the axes also show this limit. b, Experimentally measured manifold. Data points are drawn as black circles. Data points that violate the CHSH inequality are drawn as yellow circles. The surface shows a fit to the experimental data.

  6. Histogram showing the statistical distribution of quantum-state fidelity between 119 randomly chosen single-qubit target states and the corresponding mixed states generated and characterized on-chip.
    Figure 6: Histogram showing the statistical distribution of quantum-state fidelity between 119 randomly chosen single-qubit target states and the corresponding mixed states generated and characterized on-chip.

    Inset: Ψ drawn in the Bloch sphere using 63 mixed states, again generated and characterized on-chip. These states are chosen from the real plane of the sphere for clarity. Note that each point is derived from a different bipartite partially entangled state.

References

  1. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
  2. Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 400, 97117 (1985).
  3. Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phy. 21, 467488 (1982).
  4. Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 10731078 (1996).
  5. Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nature Photon. 1, 165171 (2007).
  6. Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 13301336 (2004).
  7. Dowling, J. P. Quantum optical metrology — the lowdown on high-N00N states. Contemp. Phys. 49, 125143 (2008).
  8. O'Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vuckovic, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photon. 3, 687695 (2009).
  9. Clark, A. S., Fulconis, J., Rarity, J. G., Wadsworth, W. J. & O'Brien, J. L. All-optical-fiber polarization-based quantum logic gate. Phys. Rev. A 79, 030303 (2009).
  10. Hall, M. A., Altepeter, J. B. & Kumar, P. Ultrafast switching of photonic entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 053901 (2011).
  11. Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S. & O'Brien, J. L. Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 320, 646649 (2008).
  12. Matthews, J. C. F., Politi, A., Stefanov, A. & O'Brien, J. L. Manipulation of multiphoton entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits. Nature Photon. 3, 346350 (2009).
  13. Smith, B. J., Kundys, D., Thomas-Peter, N., Smith, P. G. R. & Walmsley, I. A. Phase-controlled integrated photonic quantum circuits. Opt. Express 17, 1351613525 (2009).
  14. Politi, A., Matthews, J. C. F. & O'Brien, J. L. Shor's quantum factoring algorithm on a photonic chip. Science 325, 1221 (2009).
  15. Sansoni, L. et al. Polarization entangled state measurement on a chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 200503 (2010).
  16. Laing, A. et al. High-fidelity operation of quantum photonic circuits. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 211109 (2010).
  17. Peruzzo, A., Laing, A., Politi, A., Rudolph, T. & O'Brien, J. L. Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nature Commun. 2, 224 (2011).
  18. Honjo, T., Inoue, K. & Takahashi, H. Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution experiment with aplanar light-wave circuit Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Lett. 29, 27972799 (2004).
  19. Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B. & White, A. G. Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis. Phys. Rev. A 65, 062324 (2002).
  20. Hofmann, H. F. & Takeuchi, S. Quantum phase gate for photonic qubits using only beam splitters and postselection. Phys. Rev. A 66, 024308 (2002).
  21. Reck, M., Zeilinger, A., Bernstein, H. J. & Bertani, P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 5861 (1994).
  22. Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 20442046 (1987).
  23. Burnham, D. C. & Weinberg, D. L. Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 8487 (1970).
  24. Natarajan, C. M. et al. Operating quantum waveguide circuits with superconducting single-photon detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 211101 (2010).
  25. James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001).
  26. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880884 (1969).
  27. Lanyon, B. P., Barbieri, M., Almeida, M. P. & White, A. G. Experimental quantum computing without entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200501 (2008).
  28. Mohseni, M., Rebentrost, P., Lloyd, S. & Guzik, A. A. Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic energy transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 174106 (2008).
  29. Plenio, M. B. & Huelga, S. F. Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules. New J. Phys. 10, 113019 (2008).
  30. Perets, H. B. et al. Realization of quantum walks with negligible decoherence in waveguide lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 170506 (2008).
  31. Peruzzo, A. et al. Quantum walks of correlated photons. Science 329, 15001503 (2010).
  32. Peters, N. A., Barreiro, J. T., Goggin, M. E., Wei, T. C. & Kwiat, P. G. Remote state preparation: arbitrary remote control of photon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 150502 (2005).
  33. Zyczkowski, K. & Sommers, H-J. Induced measures in the space of mixed quantum states. J. Phys. A. 34, 71117125 (2001).
  34. Rossi, A., Vallone, G., Chiuri, A., De Martini, F. & Mataloni, P. Multipath entanglement of two photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 153902 (2009).
  35. Ceccarelli, R., Vallone, G., De Martini, F., Mataloni, P. & Cabello, A. Experimental entanglement and nonlocality of a two-photon six-qubit cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160401 (2009).
  36. Saleh, M. F., Di Giuseppe, G., Saleh, B. E. A. & Teich, M. C. Modal and polarization qubits in Ti:LiNbO3 photonic circuits for a universal quantum logic gate. Opt. Express 18, 2047520490 (2010).
  37. Saleh, M. F., Di Giuseppe, G., Saleh, B. E. A. & Teich, M. C. Photonic circuits for generating modal, spectral, and polarization entanglement. IEEE Photon. J. 2, 736752 (2010).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Quantum Photonics, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK

    • P. J. Shadbolt,
    • M. R. Verde,
    • A. Peruzzo,
    • A. Politi,
    • A. Laing,
    • M. Lobino,
    • J. C. F. Matthews,
    • M. G. Thompson &
    • J. L. O'Brien

Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary information (3.96 MB)

    Supplementary information

Additional data