Preparation and storage of frequency-uncorrelated entangled photons from cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric downconversion

Journal name:
Nature Photonics
Volume:
5,
Pages:
628–632
Year published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.213
Received
Accepted
Published online

Abstract

The preparation and storage of photonic entanglement are central to the achievement of scalable linear optical quantum computation1, 2, 3 (LOQC). The most widely used photonic entanglement source (a spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) source)4, 5 is not directly suitable for storage, because its working frequency bandwidth is significantly larger than any available quantum memory. To remedy this problem, cavity-enhanced narrow-band SPDC sources6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 have been developed. However, the storage of cavity-enhanced narrow-band entangled photons has not yet been achieved. Also, the spectral correlations between the entangled photons can make them practically useless for scalable LOQC5, 13, 14. Here, we report the preparation and storage of frequency-uncorrelated narrowband (5 MHz) entangled photons from a cavity-enhanced SPDC source. The frequency correlation between the entangled photons is eliminated by changing the continuous UV pumping beam to short pulses. The storage of the polarization state of a single photon, and of a photon entangled with another flying in the fibre, is demonstrated. Our work demonstrates a quantum interface between narrow-band entangled photons from cavity SPDC and atomic quantum memory, and thus provides an important tool towards the achievement of all-optical quantum information processing.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Experimental set-up.
    Figure 1: Experimental set-up.

    In the source laboratory, a pair of photons is generated by applying UV pump light to a periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal (PPKTP) inside a cavity. The flying photon is coupled into a 60-m-long single-mode fibre and guided to a polarization state analyser, which consists of a half wave plate (HWP), a quarter wave plate (QWP), a polarizing beamsplitter (PBS) and single photon detectors. The signal photon is directed through a 20-m-long fibre to the memory laboratory located 10 m away. In the memory laboratory, a cold atomic cloud trapped in an MOT serves as the quantum memory for the signal photon, with spatial modes U and D selected as two ensembles for storage of the vertical (V) and horizontal (H) polarization components, respectively. The path-length difference between the U and D modes is set to zero and actively stabilized. The two polarization modes are both transferred to be σ+ for storage. A strong control light is applied at an angle of 2° relative to the two spatial modes. The signal photon is stored and read out of the atomic ensemble by changing the strength of the control light. The retrieved signal photon is transmitted through a Fabry–Perot cavity and an atomic filter cell to absorb the leakage from the control light, and then subject to a polarization analyser for state analysis.

  2. Characterizations of storage medium.
    Figure 2: Characterizations of storage medium.

    a, Illustration of laser configuration. Inset: relevant atomic levels of 87Rb and associated light fields. b, Transmission spectra of coherent 50-μs-long probe light versus probe detuning from the |5S1/2,F = 1right fence right arrow |5P1/2,F = 2right fence transition in the presence (red circles) and absence (blue circles) of the control field with a Rabi frequency of 12.6 MHz. The optical depth (OD) derived from the absorption profiles is 55 and the EIT widow is ~5.5 MHz. Each data point represents an average of 20 experimental trials. c, Coincidence rates between D1 and D3. The reference coincidence (without storage) has been multiplied by factor of 0.2 for the purpose of illustration. Leakage efficiency is defined as the ratio of coincidence during storage and before storage, and overall storage efficiency is defined by the ratio of the coincidence after retrieval and before storage.

  3. Performance of the quantum memory.
    Figure 3: Performance of the quantum memory.

    a, Cross-correlation g13(2) versus storage time. bd, Fidelities after a storage time of 200 ns for six initial polarization states: 0.954 ± 0.026 (|Hright fence), 0.989 ± 0.010 (|Vright fence), 0.909 ± 0.027 (| + right fence), 0.889 ± 0.037 (| − right fence) 0.920 ± 0.031 (|Rright fence) and 0.881 ± 0.035 (|Lright fence). e, Normalized polarization correlation for the retrieved entanglement. The red (blue) curve represents that the polarization of the flying photon is projected onto | + right fence (|Hright fence). Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.

References

  1. Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 4652 (2001).
  2. Browne, D. & Rudolph, T. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501 (2005).
  3. Kok, P. et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135174 (2007).
  4. Kwiat, P. G. et al. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 43374341 (1995).
  5. Pan, J. W. et al. Multi-photon entanglement and interferometry. Rev. Mod. Phys. (submitted); preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2853.
  6. Ou, Z. Y. & Lu, Y.-J. Cavity enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion for the prolongation of correlation time between conjugate photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 25562559 (1999).
  7. Kuklewicz, C. et al. Time-bin-modulated biphotons from cavity enhanced down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 223601 (2006).
  8. Wolfgramm, F. et al. Bright filter-free source of indistinguishable photon pairs. Opt. Express 16, 1814518151 (2008).
  9. Bao, X. H. et al. Generation of narrow-band polarization-entangled photon pairs for atomic quantum memories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 190501 (2008).
  10. Scholz, M. et al. Statisics of narrow-band single photons for quantum memories generation by ultrabright cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 063603 (2009).
  11. Yang, J. et al. Experimental quantum teleportation and multiphoton entanglement via interfering narrowband photon sources. Phys. Rev. A 80, 042321 (2009).
  12. Nielsen, B., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. & Polzik, E. Time gating of heralded single photons for atomic memories. Opt. Lett. 34, 38723874 (2009).
  13. Ou, Z. Y. et al. Photon bunching and multiphoton interference in parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 60, 593604 (1999).
  14. Humble, T. & Grice, W. Effects of spectral entanglement in polarization-entanglement swapping and type-I fusion gates. Phys. Rev. A 77, 022312 (2008).
  15. Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169176 (2005).
  16. Politi, A. et al. Silica-on-silicon waveguide quantum circuits. Science 320, 646649 (2008).
  17. Wagenknecht, C. et al. Experimental demonstration of a heralded entanglement source. Nature Photon. 4, 549552 (2010).
  18. Barz, S. et al. Heralded generation of entangled photon pairs. Nature Photon. 4, 553556 (2010).
  19. Reim, K. F. et al. Towards high-speed optical memories. Nature Photon. 4, 218221 (2010).
  20. Akiba, K. et al. Storage and retrieval of nonclassical photon pairs and conditional single photons generated by the parametric down-conversion process. New J. Phys. 11, 013049 (2009).
  21. Mosley, P. et al. Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008).
  22. Raymer, M. G. et al. Pure-state single-photon wave-packet generation by parametric down-conversion in a distributed microcavity. Phys. Rev. A 72, 023825 (2005).
  23. Rarity, J. et al. Non-classical interference between independent sources. J. Opt. B 7, S171S175 (2005).
  24. Fleischhauer, M. and Lukin, M. D. Dark-State Polaritons in Electromagnetically Induced Transparency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 50945097 (2000).
  25. Phillips, D. F. et al. Storage of light in atomic vapor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 783786 (2001).
  26. Liu, C. et al. Observation of coherent optical information storage in an atomic medium using halted light pulses. Nature 409, 490493 (2001).
  27. Chaneliere, T. et al. Storage and retrieval of single photons transmitted between remote quantum memories. Nature 438, 833836 (2005).
  28. Eisaman, M. D. et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency with tunable single-photon pulses. Nature 438, 837841 (2005).
  29. Choi, K. S. et al. Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory. Nature 452, 6771 (2008).
  30. Appel, J. et al. Quantum memory for squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093602 (2008).
  31. Ketterle, W. et al. High densities of cold atoms in a dark spontaneous-force optical trap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 22532256 (1993).
  32. Chou, C-W. et al. Single-photon generation from stored excitation in an atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 213601 (2004).
  33. Zhao, B. et al. A millisecond quantum memory for scalable quantum networks. Nature Phys. 5, 9599 (2009).
  34. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880884 (1969).
  35. Bodiya, T. P. & Duan, L. M. Scalable generation of graph-state entanglement through realistic linear optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 143601 (2006).
  36. Chen, Z. B. et al. Fault-tolerant quantum repeater with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 76, 022329 (2007).
  37. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 51885191 (2001).
  38. Chen, Y. A. et al. Heralded generation of an atomic NOON state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 043601 (2010).

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Han Zhang,
    • Xian-Min Jin &
    • Jian Yang

Affiliations

  1. Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, PR China

    • Han Zhang,
    • Xian-Min Jin,
    • Jian Yang,
    • Han-Ning Dai,
    • Sheng-Jun Yang,
    • Tian-Ming Zhao,
    • Jun Rui,
    • Yu He,
    • Xiao Jiang,
    • Ge-Sheng Pan,
    • Zhen-Sheng Yuan,
    • Youjin Deng,
    • Zeng-Bing Chen,
    • Xiao-Hui Bao,
    • Shuai Chen &
    • Jian-Wei Pan
  2. Physikalisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 12, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

    • Fan Yang
  3. Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

    • Bo Zhao

Contributions

X-M.J., J.Y., H.Z., Z.-B.C., Y-J.D., X-H.B, S.C., B.Z. and J-W.P. designed the experiment. H.Z., X-M.J., J.Y., H-N.D., S-J.Y., T-M.Z., J.R., Y.H., X.J., F.Y., G-S.P., Z-S.Y. and S.C. performed the experiment and analysed the data. X-M.J., J.Y., H.Z., Y-J.D., X-H.B, B.Z. and J-W.P. edited the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to:

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary information (968 KB)

    Supplementary information

Additional data