Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers

Abstract

There is a strong demand for portable systems that can detect and characterize individual pathogens and other nanoscale objects without the use of labels, for applications in human health, homeland security, environmental monitoring and diagnostics1,2,3,4,5,6. However, most nanoscale objects of interest have low polarizabilities due to their small size and low refractive index contrast with the surrounding medium. This leads to weak light–matter interactions, and thus makes the label-free detection of single nanoparticles very difficult. Micro- and nano-photonic devices have emerged as highly sensitive platforms for such applications, because the combination of high quality factor Q and small mode volume V leads to significantly enhanced light–matter interactions7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. For example, whispering gallery mode microresonators have been used to detect and characterize single influenza virions10 and polystyrene nanoparticles with a radius of 30 nm (ref. 12) by measuring in the transmission spectrum either the resonance shift10 or mode splitting12 induced by the nanoscale objects. Increasing Q leads to a narrower resonance linewidth, which makes it possible to resolve smaller changes in the transmission spectrum, and thus leads to improved performance. Here, we report a whispering gallery mode microlaser-based real-time and label-free detection method that can detect individual 15-nm-radius polystyrene nanoparticles, 10-nm gold nanoparticles and influenza A virions in air, and 30 nm polystyrene nanoparticles in water. Our approach relies on measuring changes in the beat note that is produced when an ultra-narrow emission line from a whispering gallery mode microlaser is split into two modes by a nanoscale object, and these two modes then interfere. The ultimate detection limit is set by the laser linewidth, which can be made much narrower than the resonance linewidth of any passive resonator16,17. This means that microlaser sensors have the potential to detect objects that are too small to be detected by passive resonator sensors18.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Heterodyne detection of single nano-objects using frequency splitting in a microlaser.
Figure 2: Detecting virions and nanoparticles.
Figure 3: Estimating particle size with an ensemble measurement.
Figure 4: Simultaneous multiwavelength detection of nanoparticles using a single microlaser.
Figure 5: Detection of nanoparticles in water using frequency splitting in a microlaser.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoet, P. H., Bruske-Hohlfeld, I. & Salata, O. V. Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks. J Nanobiotechnol. 2, 12 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patolsky, F. et al. Electrical detection of single viruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14017–14022 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Naik, A. K. et al. Towards single-molecule nanomechanical mass spectrometry. Nature Nanotech. 4, 445–450 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burg, T. P. et al. Weighing of biomolecules, single cells and single nanoparticles in fluid. Nature 446, 1066–1069 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, S. P. et al. Label-free imaging, detection, and mass measurement of single viruses by surface plasmon resonance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16028–16032 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitra, A. et al. Nano-optofluidic detection of single viruses and nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4, 1305–1312 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Armani, A. M. et al. Label-free, single-molecule detection with optical microcavities. Science 317, 783–787 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold, S., Shopova, S. I. & Holler, S. Whispering gallery mode bio-sensor for label-free detection of single molecules: thermo-optic vs. reactive mechanism. Opt. Express 18, 281–287 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vollmer, F. & Arnold, S. Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules. Nature Meth. 5, 591–596 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vollmer, F., Arnold, S. & Keng, D. Single virus detection from the reactive shift of a whispering-gallery mode. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20701–20704 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shopova, S. I., Rajmangal, R., Nishida, Y. & Arnold, S. Ultrasensitive nanoparticle detection using a portable whispering gallery mode biosensor driven by a periodically poled lithium-niobate frequency doubled distributed feedback laser. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 103110 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, J. et al. On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator. Nature Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, H. et al. Analysis of single nanoparticle detection by using 3-dimensionally confined optofluidic ring resonators. Opt. Express 18, 25081–25088 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandal, S., Goddard, J. M. & Erickson, D. A multiplexed optofluidic biomolecular sensor for low mass detection. Lab. Chip 9, 2924–2932 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozdemir, S. K., Zhu, J., He, L. & Yang, L. Estimation of Purcell factor from mode-splitting spectra in an optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. A 83, 033817 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, L. et al. A 4-Hz fundamental linewidth on-chip microlaser. CLEO2007, CMR2 (2007), available at http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?uri=CLEO-2007-CMR2.

  17. Schawlow, A. L. & Townes, C. H. Infrared and optical masers. Phys. Rev. 112, 1940–1949 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, J. & Guo, L. J. Optical sensors based on active microcavities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 12, 143–147 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazzei, A. et al. Controlled coupling of counterpropagating whispering-gallery modes by a single Rayleigh scatterer: a classical problem in a quantum optical light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 173603 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, J., Ozdemir, S. K., He, L. & Yang, L. Controlled manipulation of mode splitting in an optical microcavity by two Rayleigh scatterers. Opt. Express 18, 23535–23543 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. He, L., Ozdemir, S. K., Zhu, J. & Yang, L. Scatterer induced mode splitting in poly(dimethylsiloxane) coated microresonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 221101 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. He, L., Ozdemir, S. K., Zhu, J. & Yang, L. Ultrasensitive detection of mode splitting in active optical microcavities. Phys. Rev. A 82, 053810 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Armani, D. K., Kippenberg, T. J., Spillane, S. M. & Vahala, K. J. Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip. Nature 421, 925–928 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, L. et al. Erbium-doped and Raman microlasers on a silicon chip fabricated by the sol-gel process. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 091114 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ostby, E. P. & Vahala, K. J. Yb-doped glass microcavity laser operation in water. Opt. Lett. 34, 1153–1155 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, W. et al. Demonstration of mode splitting in an optical microcavity in aqueous environment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 071111 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Richter, L. E., Mandelberg, H. I., Kruger, M. S. & Mcgrath, P. A. Linewidth determination from self-heterodyne measurements with subcoherence delay times. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 22, 2070–2074 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Person, S., Deutsch, B., Mitra, A. & Novotny, L. Material-specific detection and classification of single nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 11, 257–261 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (grant no. 0907467 and 0954941). This work was performed in part at the NRF/NNIN (NSF award no. ECS-0335765) of Washington University in St. Louis. We thank D. Chen for providing instrumentation for nanoparticle deposition, and F. Monifi and B. Peng for stimulating discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.H., S.K.O., J.Z. and L.Y. designed the experimental concept. L.H. and J.Z. performed the experiments in air. L.H. and W.K. performed the experiments in water. L.H. and S.K.O. contributed to the theoretical work. L.Y. supervised the project. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results and the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lan Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 2408 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, L., Özdemir, Ş., Zhu, J. et al. Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers. Nature Nanotech 6, 428–432 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.99

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.99

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing