Abstract
Semiconductor nanowires show promise for many device applications1,2,3, but controlled doping with electronic and magnetic impurities remains an important challenge4,5,6,7,8. Limitations on dopant incorporation have been identified in nanocrystals9, raising concerns about the prospects for doping nanostructures9,10. Progress has been hindered by the lack of a method to quantify the dopant distribution in single nanostructures. Recently, we showed that atom probe tomography can be used to determine the composition of isolated nanowires11,12. Here, we report the first direct measurements of dopant concentrations in arbitrary regions of individual nanowires. We find that differences in precursor decomposition rates between the liquid catalyst and solid nanowire surface give rise to a heavily doped shell surrounding an underdoped core. We also present a thermodynamic model that relates liquid and solid compositions to dopant fluxes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cui, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Functional nanoscale electronic devices assembled using silicon nanowire building blocks. Science 291, 851–853 (2001).
Thelander, C. et al. Nanowire-based one-dimensional electronics. Mater. Today 9, 28–35 (2006).
Lu, W. & Lieber, C. M. Nanoelectronics from the bottom up. Nature Mater. 6, 841–850 (2007).
Cui, Y., Duan, X. F., Hu, J. T. & Lieber, C. M. Doping and electrical transport in silicon nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 5213–5216 (2000).
Gudiksen, M. S. et al. Growth of nanowire superlattice structures for nanoscale photonics and electronics. Nature 415, 617–620 (2002).
Tutuc, E., Chu, J. O., Ott, J. A. & Guha, S. Doping of germanium nanowires grown in presence of PH3 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 263101 (2006).
Lew, K. K. et al. Structural and electrical properties of trimethylboron-doped silicon nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3101–3103 (2004).
Stamplecoskie, K. G., Ju, L., Farvid, S. S. & Radovanovic, P. V. General control of transition-metal-doped GaN nanowire growth: Toward understanding the mechanism of dopant incorporation. Nano Lett. 8, 2674–2681 (2008).
Erwin, S. C. et al. Doping semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature 436, 91–94 (2005).
Norris, D. J., Efros, A. L. & Erwin, S. C. Doped nanocrystals. Science 319, 1776–1779 (2008).
Perea, D. E. et al. Three-dimensional nanoscale composition mapping of semiconductor nanowires. Nano Lett. 6, 181–185 (2006).
Perea, D. E. et al. Composition analysis of single semiconductor nanowires using pulsed-laser atom probe tomography. Appl. Phys. A 85, 271–275 (2006).
Wagner, R. S. & Ellis, W. C. Vapor–liquid–solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl. Phys. Lett. 4, 89–90 (1964).
Cui, Y. et al. Diameter-controlled synthesis of single-crystal silicon nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2214–2216 (2001).
Duan, X. F. & Lieber, C. M. General synthesis of compound semiconductor nanowires. Adv. Mater. 12, 298–302 (2000).
Perea, D. E. et al. Tomographic analysis of dilute impurities in semiconductor nanostructures. J. Solid State Chem. 181, 1642–1649 (2008).
Gault, B. et al. Estimation of the reconstruction parameters for atom probe tomography. Microsc. Microanal. 14, 296–305 (2008).
Lauhon, L. J., Gudiksen, M. S., Wang, C. L. & Lieber, C. M. Epitaxial core–shell and core–multishell nanowire heterostructures. Nature 420, 57–61 (2002).
Kamins, T. I., Li, X. & Williams, R. S. Growth and structure of chemically vapor deposited Ge nanowires on Si substrates. Nano Lett. 4, 503–506 (2004).
Greytak, A. B., Lauhon, L. J., Gudiksen, M. S. & Lieber, C. M. Growth and transport properties of complementary germanium nanowire field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4176–4178 (2004).
Jang, S. M., Liao, K. & Reif, R. Phosphorus doping of epitaxial Si and Si1–xGex at very low pressure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 1675–1677 (1993).
Sodervall, U. & Friesel, M. Diffusion of silicon and phosphorus into germanium as studied by secondary ion mass spectrometry. Defect. Diffus. Forum 143, 1053–1058 (1997).
Fistul, V. I. et al. Solubility and segregation of electrically active phosphorus in Ge. Inorg. Mater. 11, 457–459 (1975).
Schmidt, V., Senz, S. & Gosele, U. Diameter dependence of the growth velocity of silicon nanowires synthesized via the vapor–liquid–solid mechanism. Phys. Rev. B 75, 045335 (2007).
Aziz, M. J. Model for solute redistribution during rapid solidification. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1158–1168 (1982).
Coates, D. E. Diffusion-controlled precipitate growth in ternary systems 1. Metall. Trans. 3, 1203–1212 (1972).
Roper, S. M. et al. Steady growth of nanowires via the vapor–liquid–solid method. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 034304 (2007).
Radovanovic, P. V., Stamplecoskie, K. G. & Pautler, B. G. Dopant ion concentration dependence of growth and faceting of manganese-doped GaN nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10980–10981 (2007).
Allen, J. E. et al. High-resolution detection of Au catalyst atoms in Si nanowires. Nature Nanotech. 3, 168–173 (2008).
Clauws, P. Oxygen related defects in germanium. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 36, 213–220 (1996).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation through the CAREER and NIRT programs. D.E.P. acknowledges the support of a Ford Foundation fellowship, J.L.L. acknowledges the support of a NSF Graduate Fellowship, E.J.S. acknowledges support of a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship, and L.J.L. acknowledges support of an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship. We acknowledge the NUANCE and NUCAPT facilities for the use of instrumentation and D. Isheim for useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.E.P. performed the atom probe experiments and data analysis. E.R.H. and J.L.F. synthesized the nanowires. E.R.H. performed TEM analysis. E.J.S and P.W.V. developed the growth model. L.J.L. coordinated the design and execution of the experiments. D.E.P. and L.J.L. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 526 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perea, D., Hemesath, E., Schwalbach, E. et al. Direct measurement of dopant distribution in an individual vapour–liquid–solid nanowire. Nature Nanotech 4, 315–319 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.51
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.51
This article is cited by
-
A study of dopant incorporation in Te-doped GaAsSb nanowires using a combination of XPS/UPS, and C-AFM/SKPM
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Stoichiometric effect on electrical and near-infrared photodetection properties of full-composition-range GaAs1−xSbx nanowires
Nano Research (2021)
-
Face-selective tungstate ions drive zinc oxide nanowire growth direction and dopant incorporation
Communications Materials (2020)
-
In-situ fabrication of ZnO thin film electrode using spent Zn–C battery and its electrochemical performance for supercapacitance
SN Applied Sciences (2019)
-
Chalcogen passivation: an in-situ method to manipulate the morphology and electrical property of GaAs nanowires
Scientific Reports (2018)