News and Views


Nature Nanotechnology 1, 22 - 23 (2006)
doi:10.1038/nnano.2006.73

Subject Category: Electronic properties and devices

Bionanoelectronics: Viruses show their good side

Mato Knez1 & Ulrich Gösele1

  1. Mato Knez and Ulrich Gösele are at the Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Weinberg 2, 06120 Halle, Germany. e-mail: mknez@mpi-halle.de; e-mail: goesele@mpi-halle.de


The tobacco mosaic virus can be combined with metallic nanoparticles to make novel electronic memory elements. Are virus-based memory sticks just around the corner?


Viruses have a bad reputation regardless of where we find them — be they in our bodies or in our computers. But on page 72 of this issue, Yang Yang and colleagues at the University of California, Los Angeles1 report that tobacco mosaic viruses (TMV) with platinum nanoparticles attached to them could be used as a nanoscale memory device that can be switched on and off electronically. Even though many questions concerning the switching mechanism remain unanswered, this work may pave the way towards the use of biological objects as basic building blocks in electronic memory devices.

In biology, high-level information processing and data storage occur in the brain through a complex set of interactions between electrical signals coupled with an intricate set of biochemical processes. Computers, on the other hand, rely on billions of electronic, optical and magnetic switches to store and process information. It has always been a dream (or, to some people, a nightmare) to combine biological and technological information processing and storage. With the advent of nanotechnology, the investigation of such combinations increasingly emerges from the realm of science fiction into the area of cutting-edge research.

After the legendary frog's leg experiment by Alessandro Volta more than 200 years ago and the subsequent understanding of how nerve signals are transmitted, it became obvious that it might be possible to transfer information electrically between cells using metallic microelectrodes. In a more complex form, the research groups of Fromherz2 and Lieber3 have managed to transfer electrical signals from electronic devices to living cells and vice versa.

Another approach for transferring electrical signals combines biological elements such as DNA strands with carbon nanotubes to create nanoscale field-effect transistors4. In parallel, a whole research field based on the use of organic molecules as electronic switches has emerged, although these components are frequently not real biological molecules5. The intellectual beauty of the work by Yang and colleagues1 lies in the combination of the tobacco mosaic virus, a rather simple biological entity at the borderline between living and non-living objects, with platinum nanoparticles to create electrically switchable memory devices.

The term 'virus' was introduced by Martinus Beijerinck, one of the pioneers of modern virology, in 1898 to describe the infectious liquid he extracted from infected tobacco leaves6. Other natural viruses were soon found and identified, but the TMV has remained a popular subject of research. In 1939 Ernst Ruska and co-workers used the TMV to demonstrate the potential of transmission electron microscopy, and Ruska went on to share the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physics for developing the electron microscope. In order to increase image contrast, Ruska and co-workers attached colloidal gold nanoparticles to the virus7, which was the earliest work describing structures similar to those used by the UCLA team1.

About 50 years later, the TMV gained popularity again. Its nanoscale size and our detailed knowledge of its structure begged for a possible use in nanotechnology. The first success came when hybrid bio–inorganic nanostructures were synthesized. The outer surface of the virus was successfully decorated with inorganic nanoparticles from both a liquid suspension8 and the gas phase9. Now the time has come for a bio–inorganic model system in the area of nanoelectronics.

Yang and colleagues attached platinum nanoparticles to the outer surface of the TMV, embedded the virus–nanoparticle hybrid in a non-conductive polymer, and sandwiched it between two metallic electrodes (Fig. 1). By applying an electrical potential between the two electrodes, they observed a marked increase in current when the voltage reached about 3 volts. In this 'on' state electrons were able to tunnel through a seemingly impenetrable barrier because of their quantum nature. The 'on' state remained stable unless the voltage went below -2.4 volts, which switched the device off. This on/off behaviour allows the structure to be used as a memory device.

Figure 1: Schematic view of a memory device based on a tobacco mosaic virus (red) coated with platinum nanoparticles (spheres) between two metallic electrodes.

Figure 1 : Schematic view of a memory device based on a tobacco mosaic virus (red) coated with platinum nanoparticles (spheres) between two metallic electrodes.

a, The low conduction ('off') state in the absence of applied voltage is most probably caused by charge transfer between the virus and nanoparticles, as indicated by the semitransparent spheres for some nanoparticles. b, When a sufficiently high voltage is applied, this natural charge-transfer process is reversed and electrons can tunnel (yellow arrows) between the nanoparticles to produce a high conduction ('on') state.

Full size image (13 KB)

This switching effect also occurs if the TMV is replaced by a non-biological polymer nanorod of a similar size10. But the difference in switching speed ('on' to 'off' state) indicates that both the shape and (bio)chemistry of the nanorod can influence the system. This leaves plenty of room for optimizing the device. When the platinum particles were not connected to a rod-like structure but randomly distributed within the polymer, the system failed to display this switching effect. Instead, the authors saw a relatively high conduction between nanoparticles occurring through electronic tunnelling processes.

Yang and colleagues speculate that in the absence of applied voltage, there is a charge transfer between the nanoparticles and the TMV. This blocks the tunnelling between platinum nanoparticles and results in an 'off' state (Fig. 1a). A sufficiently high voltage reverses the charge transfer and once again allows current to flow by tunnelling processes between the nanoparticles, thereby turning the device 'on' (Fig. 1b). This charge transfer apparently can be switched back and forth reversibly many times.

What is the outlook for practical use of these virus-based memory elements? Current electronics operate at gigahertz frequencies and there is a push towards terahertz operation. Although the viruses can currently be switched at megahertz frequencies at best, and with a comparatively low number of possible switching cycles, this disadvantage could be a stimulus for more-detailed investigation and improvement of the principle. If we understand how to design electronic systems that can reliably communicate with biological systems in a controlled way, we will step into a completely new (bio)technological field.

On the basis of what we will learn from this primitive biological/nanoparticle hybrid memory device and from future experiments, we might finally begin to see new commercial electronic devices made with biological components including virus-based memory sticks. And if we are unlucky, these might one day be infected by 'real' computer viruses.



Top

References

  1. Tseng, R. J. et al. Nature Nanotech. 1, 72–77 (2006). | Article |
  2. Fromherz, P. ChemPhysChem 3, 276–284 (2002). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  3. Patolsky, F. et al. Science 313, 1100–1104 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Keren, K., Berman, R. S., Buchstab, E., Sivan, U. & Braun, E. Science 302, 1380–1382 (2003). | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Lörtscher, E., Ciszek, J. W., Tour, J. & Riel, H.Small 2, 973–977 (2006).
  6. Beijerinck, M. J. Verh. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. 65, 3–21 (1898).
  7. Kausche, G. A. & Ruska, H. Kolloid-Z. 89, 21–26 (1939). | Article | ChemPort |
  8. Shenton, W., Douglas, T., Young, M., Stubbs, G. & Mann, S. Adv. Mater. 11, 253–;256 (1999). | Article | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Knez, M. et al. Nano. Lett. 6, 1172–1177 (2006). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  10. Tseng, R. J. et al. Nano Lett. 5, 1077–1080 (2005). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.


Extra navigation

Subscribe to Nature Nanotechnology

Subscribe

Search PubMed for

naturejobs

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT