Figure 4 - Electrical devices of semiconducting and metallic SWNTs.


From the following article

Sorting carbon nanotubes by electronic structure using density differentiation

Michael S. Arnold, Alexander A. Green, James F. Hulvat, Samuel I. Stupp & Mark C. Hersam

Nature Nanotechnology 1, 60 - 65 (2006) Published online: 4 October 2006

doi:10.1038/nnano.2006.52

BACK TO ARTICLE
Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

a, Periodic array of source and drain electrodes (single device highlighted in red, scale bar 40 microm, gap 20 microm). b, Representative AFM image of thin-film, percolating SWNT network (scale bar = 1 microm). The density of SWNTs per unit area is >10 times the percolation limit (Supplementary Fig. S7). c, Field-effect transistor geometry (s = source; g = gate; d = drain). The SWNT networks were formed on a 100-nm, thermally grown SiO2 layer, which served as the gate dielectric. d, Inverse of sheet resistance as a function of gate bias for semiconducting (red, triangles) and metallic (blue, squares) SWNTs sorted in co-surfactant density gradients (characterized in Fig. 3e). The metallic SWNTs did not significantly switch with gate bias (<2), in contrast with the semiconducting SWNTs, which switched by a factor of >2 times 104. (Error bars described in Supplementary Information, Methods.) The inset shows a semiconducting device plotted on a linear scale (red curve, same units). A lower bound for mobility in the semiconducting SWNTs is estimated (from the grey fit) to be 20 cm2 V-1 s-1 (see Supplementary Information, Methods), comparable to previously reported mobilities for thin films of as-synthesized mixtures of metallic and semiconducting SWNTs near their percolation threshold29.

BACK TO ARTICLE