Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

A call for bioimaging software usability

Bioimaging software developed in a research setting often is not widely used by the scientific community. We suggest that, to maximize both the public's and researchers' investments, usability should be a more highly valued goal. We describe specific characteristics of usability toward which bioimaging software projects should aim.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. Eliceiri, K.W. et al. Nat. Methods 9, 697–710 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baxter, S.M., Day, S.W., Fetrow, J.S. & Reisinger, S.J. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e87 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fogel, K. Producing Open Source Software (O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolchini, D., Finkelstein, A., Perrone, V. & Nagl, S. Bioinformatics 25, 406–412 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rimmer, J. J. Audiov. Media Med. 27, 6–10 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vandewalle, P., Kovacevic, J. & Vetterli, M. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE 26, 37–47 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mesirov, J.P. Science 327, 415–406 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng, R.D. Science 334, 1226–1227 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ioannidis, J.P.A. & Khoury, M.J. Science 334, 1230–1232 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ince, D.C., Hatton, L. & Graham-Cumming, J. Nature 482, 485–488 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider, C.A., Rasband, W.S. & Eliceiri, K.W. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamentsky, L. et al. Bioinformatics 27, 1179–1180 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linkert, M. et al. J. Cell Biol. 189, 777–782 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Preibisch, S., Tomancak, P. & Saalfeld, S. ImageJ User and Developer Conference 1, 72 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sommer, C. et al. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging 230 (2011).

  16. Goldberg, I.G. et al. Genome Biol. 6, R47 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schultheiss, S.J., Münch, M.C., Andreeva, G.D. & Rätsch, G. PLoS ONE 6, e24914 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Veretnik, S., Fink, J.L. & Bourne, P.E. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000136 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, H., Hall, P.A.V. & May, J.H.R. ACM Comput. Surv. 29, 366–427 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruusuvuori, P. et al. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 248 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ljosa, V., Sokolnicki, K. & Carpenter, A.E. Nat. Methods 9, 637–638 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of our research groups and our software projects for helpful feedback on the manuscript, in particular CellProfiler cofounder T.R. Jones. This work was supported in part by US National Institutes of Health grants R01 GM089652 (to A.E.C.) and RC2 GM092519 (to K.W.E.), but the opinions expressed are solely those of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anne E Carpenter or Kevin W Eliceiri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpenter, A., Kamentsky, L. & Eliceiri, K. A call for bioimaging software usability. Nat Methods 9, 666–670 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2073

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2073

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing