Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 30 May 2012

This article has been updated

Abstract

The International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium is an international collaboration between major public interaction data providers to share literature-curation efforts and make a nonredundant set of protein interactions available in a single search interface on a common website (http://www.imexconsortium.org/). Common curation rules have been developed, and a central registry is used to manage the selection of articles to enter into the dataset. We discuss the advantages of such a service to the user, our quality-control measures and our data-distribution practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Overview of the IMEx dataset.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 10 April 2012

    In the version of this article initially published, the names of two authors, Fiona S.L. Brinkman and Robert E.W. Hancock, were incorrectly listed without middle initials. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Bader, G.D., Cary, M.P. & Sander, C. Pathguide: a pathway resource list. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, d504–d506 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Orchard, S. et al. The minimum information required for reporting a molecular interaction experiment (MIMIx). Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 894–898 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orchard, S. & Hermjakob, H. The HUPO proteomics standards initiative - easing communication and minimizing data loss in a changing world. Brief. Bioinform. 9, 166–173 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alfarano, C. et al. The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database and related tools 2005 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, d418–d424 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xenarios, I. et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 303–305 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rain, J.C. et al. The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature 409, 211–215 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerrien, S. et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, d841–d846 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ceol, A. et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, d533–d539 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guldener, U. et al. MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, d436–d441 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hermjakob, H. et al. The HUPO PSI′s molecular interaction format–a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 177–183 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerrien, S. et al. Broadening the horizon–level 2.5 of the HUPO-PSI format for molecular interactions. BMC Biol. 5, 44 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chautard, E., Fatoux-Ardore, M., Ballut, L., Thierry-Mieg, N. & Ricard-Blum, S. MatrixDB, the extracellular matrix interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, d235–d240 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goll, J. et al. MPIDB: the microbial protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 24, 1743–1744 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown, K.R. & Jurisica, I. Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks. Genome Biol. 8, R95 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynn, D.J. InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 218 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Breitkreutz, B.J. et al. The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, d637–d640 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perreau, V.M. et al. A domain level interaction network of amyloid precursor protein and Abeta of Alzheimer′s disease. Proteomics 10, 2377–2395 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Giot, L. et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302, 1727–1736 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rual, J.F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173–1178 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stelzl, U. et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122, 957–968 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT and IntAct contribute to the Second BioCreative challenge: serving the text-mining community with high quality molecular interaction data. Genome Biol. 9 (Suppl. 2), s5 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leitner, F. et al. The FEBS Letters/BioCreative II.5 experiment: making biological information accessible. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 897–899 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, Y.C., Rajagopala, S.V., Stellberger, T. & Uetz, P. Exhaustive benchmarking of the yeast two-hybrid system. Nat. Methods 7, 667–668 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Montecchi-Palazzi, L. et al. The PSI semantic validator: a framework to check MIAPE compliance of proteomics data. Proteomics 9, 5112–5119 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turner, B. et al. iRefWeb: interactive analysis of consolidated protein interaction data and their supporting evidence. Database baq023 (2010).

  26. Aranda, B. et al. PSICQUIC and PSISCORE: accessing and scoring molecular interactions. Nat. Methods 8, 528–529 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prieto, C. & De Las Rivas, J. APID: Agile Protein Interaction DataAnalyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W298–W302 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, d561–d568 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Keshava Prasad, T.S. et al. Human Protein Reference Database—2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, d767–d772 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Turinsky, A.L. et al. Literature curation of protein interactions: measuring agreement across major public databases. Database baq026 (2010).

  31. Salwinski, L. et al. Recurated protein interaction datasets. Nat. Methods 6, 860–861 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. UniProt Consortium. Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, d214–d219 (2011).

  33. Sayers, E.W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, d5–d16 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Commission under PSIMEx, contract FP7-HEALTH-2007-223411, and in part by AntiPathoGN contract number HEALTH-F3-2009-223101, Serving Life-science Information for the Next Generation contract number 226073, Apoptosis Systems Biology Applied to Cancer and AIDS contract number FP7-HEALTH-2007-200767, the Ontario Research Fund (GL2-01-030), Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI #12301 and CFI #203383), the Grand Challenges in Global Health program through the Foundation for the US National Institutes of Health and Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and Genome Canada and National Institutes of Health grant GM071909.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Orchard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.B., U.M. and A.R. are employees of Molecular Connections, a contract annotation company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orchard, S., Kerrien, S., Abbani, S. et al. Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium. Nat Methods 9, 345–350 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1931

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1931

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research