Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Channelrhodopsin engineering and exploration of new optogenetic tools

Nature Methods volume 8, pages 39–42 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Rhodopsins from microalgae and eubacteria are powerful tools for manipulating the function of neurons and other cells, but these tools still have limitations. We discuss engineering approaches that can help advance optogenetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A simplified kinetic model of channelrhodopsin function.
Figure 2: Structural model of a channelrhodopsin.

References

  1. Stehfest, K., Ritter, E., Berndt, A., Bartl, F. & Hegemann, P. J. Mol. Biol. 398, 690–702 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deisseroth, K. Nat. Methods 8, 26–29 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunaydin, L.A. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 387–392 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, J.Y., Lin, M.Z., Steinbach, P. & Tsien, R.Y. Biophys. J. 96, 1803–1814 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritter, E., Stehfest, K., Berndt, A., Hegemann, P. & Bartl, F.J. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35033–35041 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nack, M., Radu, I., Bamann, C., Bamberg, E. & Heberle, J. FEBS Lett. 583, 3676–3680 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Feiler, R. et al. J. Neurosci. 12, 3862–3868 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimura, Y., Ikegami, A. & Stoeckenius, W. Photochem. Photobiol. 40, 641–646 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wen, L. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e12893 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegemann, P., Gärtner, W. & Uhl, R. Biophys. J. 60, 1477–1489 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakanishi, K. & Crouch, R. Isr. J. Chem. 35, 253–272 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Asato, A.E., Li, X.Y., Mead, D., Patterson, G.M.L. & Liu, R.S.H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 7398–7399 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow, B.Y. et al. Nature 463, 98–102 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schröder-Lang, S. et al. Nat. Methods 4, 39–42 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stierl, M. et al. J. Biol. Chem. published online 28 October 2010 (doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.185496).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryu, M., Moskvin, O.V., Siltberg-Liberles, J. & Gomelsky, M. J. Biol. Chem. published online 28 October 2010 (doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.177600).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rana, A. & Dolmetsch, R.E. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 617–622 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Möglich, A. & Moffat, K. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 9, 1286–1300 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Toettcher, J.E., Voigt, C.A., Wiener, O.D. & Lim, W.E. Nat. Methods 8, 35–38 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, Y.I. et al. Nature 461, 104–108 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strickland, D., Moffat, K. & Sosnick, T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10709–10714 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harper, S.M., Neil, L.C. & Gardner, K.H. Science 301, 1541–1544 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Möglich, A., Ayers, R. & Moffat, K. J. Mol. Biol. 385, 1433–1444 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levskaya, A., Weiner, O., Lim, W. & Voigt, C. Nature 461, 997–1001 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimizu-Sato, S., Huq, E., Tepperman, J.M. & Quail, P.H. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 1041–1044 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennedy, M.J. et al. Nat. Methods 7, 973–975 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peron, S. & Svoboda, K. Nat. Methods 8, 30–34 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Facciotti, M.T. et al. Biophys. J. 81, 3442–3455 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Peter Hegemann and Andreas Möglich are at Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Biophysics, Berlin, Germany.,

    Peter Hegemann & Andreas Möglich

Authors
  1. Peter Hegemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Möglich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hegemann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hegemann, P., Möglich, A. Channelrhodopsin engineering and exploration of new optogenetic tools. Nat Methods 8, 39–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.327

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.327

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing